Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1543715

Association Between the Dietary Inflammatory Index, Bowel Habits, and Systemic Serum Inflammatory Markers: Insights from NHANES (2005-2010)

Provisionally accepted
Zeyang Zhou Zeyang Zhou Xiangyong Li Xiangyong Li Mengya Xiong Mengya Xiong Yuee He Yuee He Xinmeng Cheng Xinmeng Cheng Jianbo Deng Jianbo Deng Yanan Li Yanan Li Xiaoyang Zhang Xiaoyang Zhang Zhengcao Zhang Zhengcao Zhang Chenxi Zhou Chenxi Zhou Xiaodong Yang Xiaodong Yang *
  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: To examine the relationship between the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII), abnormal bowel habits, and systemic serum inflammatory markers.Methods: Data from 9,880 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2010 were analyzed. The DII was calculated from two 24-hour dietary recalls. Bowel habits were assessed using the Bristol Stool Form Scale, and systemic inflammatory markers included AAPR, IBI, NLR, LMR, PNLR, LCR, LA, and PLR. Statistical analyses were performed using R, Zstats, and EmpowerStats to evaluate associations.Results: Higher DII scores were positively associated with abnormal bowel habits, including constipation [β (95% CI): 0.11 (0.01-0.22)] and diarrhea [β (95% CI): 0.42 (0.32-0.53)], and with PNLR [β (95% CI): 0.01 (0.01-0.01)], PNLRQ4 [β (95% CI): 0.13 (0.05-0.20)], IBI [β (95% CI): 0.02 (0.01-0.02)], and IBIQ4 [β (95% CI): 0.33 (0.25-0.42)] (p < 0.05). Negative associations were found with AAPR [β (95% CI): -0.33 (-0.60--0.06)] and AAPRQ4 [β (95% CI): -0.18 (-0.34--0.01)], while no significant associations were observed with LA, LCR, or LMR. Subgroup analyses confirmed stable associations between DII and both chronic diarrhea and constipation across seven subgroups. Smoothed curve fitting revealed nonlinear relationships. A J-shaped association between DII and chronic constipation was identified in BMI and IBI subgroups. For BMI >30, the breakpoint (K) was 1.89, with ORs of 1.228 (95% CI: 1.097-1.375) below and 3.318 (95% CI: 1.531-7.191) above this point. In the IBI Q4 subgroup, the breakpoint was 1.96, with ORs of 1.145 (95% CI: 1.013-1.294) below and 5.794 (95% CI: 2.359-14.228) above. In the diarrhea group, a U-shaped association was observed in the AAPR Q4 population, with a breakpoint of -1.312 and ORs of 0.657 (95% CI: 0.478-0.901) below and 1.266 (95% CI: 1.057-1.518) above.Conclusions: Higher DII scores are linked to an increased risk of chronic constipation and diarrhea and are associated with systemic inflammatory markers and factors such as BMI.

    Keywords: DiI, Bowel habits, inflammation-related markers, NHANES, Bristol Stool Scale

    Received: 12 Dec 2024; Accepted: 06 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Zhou, Li, Xiong, He, Cheng, Deng, Li, Zhang, Zhang, Zhou and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Xiaodong Yang, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more