data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
REVIEW article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutrition Methodology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1536386
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) or Weight-for-Length Z-Score (WHZ) are used to screen for acute malnutrition in children. The relative merits of MUAC and WHZ, as well as whether they ought to be used separately, are still up for debate. Considering the significant impact of acute malnutrition on a large number of children in Africa, along with the constraints on resources, it is crucial to critically assess the validity of simple and widely used tools utilized in both African communities and clinical settings.Therefore, this study aimed to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of MUAC in screening acute malnutrition among children aged 6-59 months in Africa.Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted to pool evidence on the diagnostic performance of MUAC compared to WHZ among children aged 6 to 59 months across various studies in Africa. The StataMP 17.0 software was utilized for analysis, employing a Bivariate Random-effects Meta-Analysis model. Sensitivity, specificity, the Diagnostic Odds Ratio, and the Area Under the Curve were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q statistic and the I² test. Additionally, metaregression, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and assessments for publication bias were employed. The overall level of diagnostic test accuracy was estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis model.Results: Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 38.1% (95% CI: 30.7%, 46.1%) and 94.9% (95% CI: 93.2%, 96.2%), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve plot showed that MUAC had good accuracy in detecting acute malnutrition (AUC= 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.88). The pooled level of diagnostic odds ratio was 13.22 (95% CI: 9.68, 16.77).The rate of misclassification in screening for acute malnutrition using MUAC was observed to be 11.7%.The MUAC demonstrated low sensitivity but high specificity in diagnosing acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months across various regions of Africa. Furthermore, it was found that MUAC provides good diagnostic test accuracy when compared to WHZ. To enhance its accuracy, it is suggested to increase the MUAC cutoff thresholds.
Keywords: acute malnutrition, MUAC, WHZ, Validation, Diagnostic accuracy, Children, Africa
Received: 30 Nov 2024; Accepted: 21 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Menber, Belachew and Fentahun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yonatan Menber, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.