
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Clinical Nutrition
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1530025
This article is part of the Research Topic Nutriomic Analysis of Food and Functional Compounds for MAFLD Prevention View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Background: The relationship between sodium intake and the incidence and mortality of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is underexplored in 2 nutritional epidemiology, highlighting the need for further research.This longitudinal cohort study analyzed data from 13,853 Participants aged 20 and older from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018), including 4,465 participants with NAFLD. We collected comprehensive data on mortality, dietary sodium intake, and relevant covariates. Logistic regression assessed the relationship between sodium consumption and NAFLD incidence, while Cox regression and smooth curve fitting explored sodium intake's link to all-cause mortality among Participants with NAFLD.Results: After adjusting for confounders, logistic regression revealed a positive association between higher sodium intake and NAFLD incidence (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.21). Adjusted odds ratios for the second (Q2), third (Q3), and fourth (Q4) quartiles of sodium intake were 0.91, 1.23, and 1.52, respectively. Smooth curve fitting and threshold analysis revealed a non-linear association between sodium intake and NAFLD risk, with an inflection point at 2.49 g/d, above which NAFLD risk significantly increased. In Cox regression, sodium intake was inversely correlated with all-cause mortality in Participants with NAFLD (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.80, 0.96), with adjusted hazard ratios for Q2, Q3, and Q4 being 0.79, 0.66, and 0.63, respectively. A nonlinear model indicated a threshold effect, revealing a correlation between dietary sodium intake and mortality risk (p = 0.001). We identified a threshold intake of 3.5 grams per day (equivalent to 8.9 grams of sodium chloride): below this, each unit increase in sodium intake was associated with a 16% reduction in mortality risk (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.80, 0.90). For intakes above this threshold, no significant relationship with mortality risk was observed (HR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.90, 1.08).Conclusions: This study suggests that higher sodium intake in individuals with NAFLD is associated with increased disease incidence but decreased all-cause mortality. The dose-response relationship between sodium intake and mortality risk exhibited a nonlinear pattern, with a critical inflection point around 3.5 grams per day.
Keywords: Sodium intake, Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, All-cause mortality, Dose-response relationship
Received: 18 Nov 2024; Accepted: 04 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Wan, Dai, Cui and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yifeng Cui, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
Zhaoyang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.