The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology
Volume 11 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1519782
This article is part of the Research Topic Eating Behavior and Chronic Diseases: Research Evidence from Population Studies, Volume II View all 3 articles
Low-Carbohydrate Diet Score and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Machine Learning Analysis of NHANES Data
Provisionally accepted- 1 Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- 2 Emergency Medicine, Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- 3 Intensive Care Medicine, Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- 4 Geriatrics, Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
Background: Recent research has identified the Low-Carbohydrate Diet (LCD) score as a novel biomarker, with studies showing that LCDs can reduce carbon dioxide retention, potentially improving lung function. While the link between the LCD score and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been explored, its relevance in the U.S. population remains uncertain. This study aims to explore the association between the LCD score and the likelihood of COPD prevalence in this population.Methods: Data from 16,030 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) collected between 2007 and 2023 were analyzed to examine the relationship between LCD score and COPD. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to reduce baseline bias. Weighted multivariable logistic regression models were applied, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression was used to explore possible nonlinear relationships. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the results. Additionally, we employed eight machine learning methods-Boost Tree, Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, MLP, Naive Bayes, KNN, Random Forest, and SVM RBF-to build predictive models and evaluate their performance. Based on the best-performing model, we further examined variable importance and model accuracy.Results: Upon controlling for variables, the LCD score demonstrated a strong correlation with the odds of COPD prevalence. In compared to the lowest quartile, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for the high quartile were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.95), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.93), and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.78). RCS analysis demonstrated a linear inverse relationship between the LCD score and the odds of COPD prevalence. Furthermore, the random forest model exhibited robust predictive efficacy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 71.6%.Conclusions: Our study of American adults indicates that adherence to the LCD may be linked to lower odds of COPD prevalence. These findings underscore the important role of the LCD score as a tool for enhancing COPD prevention efforts within the general population. Nonetheless, additional prospective cohort studies are required to assess and validate these results.
Keywords: NHANES 1, low-carbohydrate diet score 2, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 3, cross-sectional study 4, Machine Learning 5
Received: 30 Oct 2024; Accepted: 02 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Zhang, Mo, Yang, Tan, Qin and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xin Zhang, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Jipeng Mo, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Kaiyu Yang, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Tiewu Tan, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Hui Qin, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Cuiping Zhao, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.