Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Nutr., 26 November 2024
Sec. Nutrition and Metabolism
This article is part of the Research Topic Dietary Nitrate: Friend or Foe View all 6 articles

Editorial: Dietary nitrate: friend or foe

  • 1School of Medical and Health Sciences, Nutrition & Health Innovation Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
  • 2Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
  • 3Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 4School of Population Health, Dementia Centre of Excellence, enAble Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
  • 5Royal Perth Hospital Unit, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia

Editorial on the Research Topic
Dietary nitrate: friend or foe

The health implications of dietary nitrate remain a topic of active debate within the scientific community. The primary sources of dietary nitrate are vegetables (accounting for ~70%−80% of total intake), meat (~10%−15%, where nitrate and nitrite are both naturally occurring and highly regulated added preservatives in processed meat products), and drinking water (~1%−10%, where nitrate is a contaminant) (13). The positive health effects of nitrate are primarily mediated by its derivative, nitric oxide (NO), whereas its negative effects may stem from the potential formation of N-nitrosamines (2, 4). Nitric oxide plays numerous critical physiological roles, fuelling significant research into the health benefits of dietary nitrate intake. Nitrate (NO3) is converted into nitrite (NO2), which is then further reduced to NO through an enterosalivary nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway (Figure 1) (5). In contrast, nitrate and nitrite may also contribute to the formation of carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds, both exogenously and endogenously (2, 4). The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has stated that “ingested nitrate or nitrite under conditions that result in endogenous nitrosation is probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A).” Recently, the European Commission further restricted the use and maximum levels of nitrate and nitrite as added preservatives in cheeses and processed meats (6). There is now a growing body of evidence, advanced through clinical trials and observational studies, indicating that the health effects of dietary nitrate could depend on its source—vegetables, meat, and water. It is hypothesized that the food matrix and accompanying compounds determine whether dietary nitrate has a health benefit or health risk by influencing whether it leads to the formation of NO or N-nitroso compounds (e.g., nitrosamines) (1). The articles in this Research Topic add significant weight in support of this hypothesis.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Nitrate dietary source and its health benefits and risks. Created with BioRender.com.

In a minireview by Zoughaib et al., the authors investigate and discuss the effects of nitrate-rich beetroot juice, now promoted as a supplement for exercise, compared to inorganic nitrate salts on physiological function and exercise capacity. Their conclusion is that beetroot juice outperforms nitrate salts in reducing submaximal oxygen consumption during exercise. The authors hypothesize that the antioxidant and/or anti-inflammatory properties of beetroot, stemming from its rich spectrum of phytonutrients, contribute to these results. However, they caution that it is too soon to draw any firm conclusions and recommend that future studies accurately measure and match the nitrate content in supplements and improve blinding methods by comparing nitrate-containing and nitrate-free versions of beetroot juice and nitrate supplements. They also recommend that studies should focus on reproducible physiological outcomes rather than performance, through the use of involuntary exercise protocols to help mitigate differences in participant expectations and motivations. They raise an important point when considering source—dependent health outcomes of dietary nitrate intake—the presence of other components like potassium and oxalate may limit its use in individuals with health conditions, particularly those with compromised renal function or heart failure.

Comparing nitrate-containing and nitrate-free versions of beetroot juice, Kim et al. and Delgado Spicuzza et al. from the Proctor research lab report results from two randomized, controlled clinical trials. Kim et al. reported that 4–6 days supplementation with nitrate-rich beetroot juice significantly lowered diastolic blood pressure and increased coronary blood flow velocity in individuals with peripheral arterial disease (n = 11) at the peak treadmill walking stage. Delgado Spicuzza et al. demonstrated that 7-day nitrate-rich beetroot juice supplementation significantly improved resting endothelial function before ischemia-reperfusion injury in postmenopausal women, compared to nitrate-depleted beetroot juice. While it would be interesting to include nitrate-rich beetroot juice, nitrate-depleted beetroot juice, and nitrate salts in a single trial to compare their health impacts, the results from the current studies highlight the potential role of the food matrix, particularly co-existing compounds, in determining the health functions of dietary nitrate. The reported synergistic effects between plant nitrate and vitamin C (7), and polyphenols (8, 9) are good examples. These reducing compounds can enhance NO production, and mitigate potential adverse effects of dietary nitrate by inhibiting the formation of N-nitrosamines (10).

Investigating the “source of nitrate hypothesis” in a large observation study, Erichsen et al. report dietary nitrate intakes in the context of background diet, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors in a Danish cohort of over 55,000 participants. These results are currently being used to inform future studies in this cohort examining source of nitrate and long-term health outcomes. For example, the authors have recently reported that higher plant-sourced nitrate and nitrite intake was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality while higher intakes of naturally occurring meat-sourced nitrate and nitrite, additive permitted meat-sourced nitrate and nitrite, and water-sourced nitrate were all linked to higher risks of all-cause mortality, all with potential confounders being adjusted (11). Following the same method of distinguishing between plant- and animal-sourced nitrate, Rajendra et al. reported that, compared to lower intakes, a higher plant-, but not animal-, sourced nitrate intake was associated with a lower risk of dementia-related mortality in Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle (AusDiab) Study (n = 9,149). Furthermore, a high, compared to a low, processed meat-sourced nitrate intake was associated with a higher risk of dementia-related mortality. While these studies add weight to the “source of nitrate hypothesis,” more research is required to examine long term health outcomes in the context of higher nitrate intakes and those with impaired nitrate metabolism, the influence of the oral and gut microbiome, as well as factors influencing N-nitrosamine formation.

Addressing the nitrate debate is gaining some urgency considering that nitrate-rich plant extracts are being used to replace inorganic nitrate and nitrite salts (E 249–252) in processed meat production in the hope of leveraging the co-existing reducing phytochemicals to inhibit the exogenous and endogenous formation of N-nitroso compounds (12). This development has sparked considerable debate related to food labeling and food safety. Simultaneously, a concern has been raised that nitrate-rich beetroot juice supplementation, with or without concurrent vitamin C supplementation, can increase the endogenous formation and excretion of potentially carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds (13). Indeed, the health impact of long-term intake of beet-based or other nitrate-rich supplements should be thoroughly explored before promoting these commercial products. This is particularly important given that some supplements that are currently commercialized have extremely high nitrate contents, up to 21,512.4 mg/kg, with some also containing high levels of co-occurring nitrite, up to 1,115.2 mg/kg (14). These values far exceed the regulatory limits for both processed meat products (< 500 mg/kg nitrate, < 200 mg/kg nitrite) and vegetables such as arugula (7,000 mg/kg nitrate, harvested between 1 October and 31 March) which has the highest limit (15). Therefore, consumers should be provided with comprehensive and precise instructions regarding the consumption of these supplements.

The emerging studies surrounding the nitrate debate in this Research Topic, and beyond, are charting the health impact of dietary nitrate and nitrite altering our attitude toward these compounds. However, both the health benefits and potential negative effects point to more sustainable and healthy eating practices: i.e., consuming more vegetables and fewer processed meats. While the nitrate debate is yet to be solved, it is reasonably clear that the food matrix, particularly the co-existing compounds in the wholefood, should be considered. Understanding the complex effects that food structure and co-occurring components have on the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway from a holistic rather than a nutrient-based perspective, will be critical. The hypothesis that the source of nitrate determines its health effects has yet to be disproven, indeed evidence is rapidly accumulating in its support. This will carry significant weight in shaping international policies governing safe levels of nitrate in both environmental and dietary contexts, currently the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of nitrate, does not differentiate between the sources.

Author contributions

LZ: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. NB: Writing – review & editing. MS: Writing – review & editing. CB: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work is supported by the Western Australian Future Health Research and Innovation Fund, an initiative of the Western Australian State Government. The salary of Liezhou Zhong is supported by an Emerging Leader Fellowship from the Western Australian Future Health Research and Innovation Fund and a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Ideas Grants (ID: 2028286); the salary of Catherine P. Bondonno is supported by a Royal Perth Hospital Research Foundation “Lawrie Beilin” Career Advancement Fellowship (ID: CAF 127/2020); and the Western Australian Future Health Research and Innovation Fund. Nicola P. Bondonno is funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship (Grant number APP1159914), Australia.

Acknowledgments

Figure was created with BioRender.com.

Conflict of interest

MS is a senior scientific advisor and he has received honoraria from Berkely Life.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Bondonno CP, Zhong L, Bondonno NP, Sim M, Blekkenhorst LC, Liu A, et al. Nitrate: the Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde of human health? Trends Food Sci Technol. (2023) 135:57–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.03.014

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. EFSA. Nitrate in vegetables - scientific opinion of the panel on contaminants in the food chain. EFSA J. (2008) 6:689. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.689

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Mortensen A, Aguilar F, Crebelli R, Di Domenico A, Dusemund B, Frutos MJ, et al. Re-evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives. Efsa J. (2017) 15:e04787. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4787

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. EFSA EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain, Schrenk D, Bignami M, Bodin L, Chipman JK, Del Mazo J, et al. Risk assessment of N-nitrosamines in food. EFSA J. (2023) 21:e07884. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7884

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E. NO-synthase independent NO generation in mammals. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2010) 396:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.02.136

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/2108 of 6 October 2023 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 as regards food additives nitrites (E 249-250) and nitrates (E 251-252) (2023).

Google Scholar

7. Lbban E, Ashor A, Shannon OM, Idris I, Siervo M. Is vitamin C a booster of the effects of dietary nitrate on endothelial function? Physiologic rationale and implications for research. Nutrition. (2023) 109:111995. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2023.111995

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Bondonno CP, Yang X, Croft KD, Considine MJ, Ward NC, Rich L, et al. Flavonoid-rich apples and nitrate-rich spinach augment nitric oxide status and improve endothelial function in healthy men and women: a randomized controlled trial. Free Radic Biol Med. (2012) 52:95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.09.028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Rodriguez-Mateos A, Hezel M, Aydin H, Kelm M, Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, et al. Interactions between cocoa flavanols and inorganic nitrate: additive effects on endothelial function at achievable dietary amounts. Free Radical Bio Med. (2015) 80:121–8. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.12.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Rocha BS, Nunes C, Laranjinha J. Tuning constitutive and pathological inflammation in the gut via the interaction of dietary nitrate and polyphenols with host microbiome. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. (2016) 81:393–402. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.10.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Bondonno NP, Pokharel P, Bondonno CP, Erichsen DW, Zhong L, Schullehner J, et al. Source-specific nitrate intake and all-cause mortality in the danish diet, cancer, and health study. Eur J Epidemiol. (2024) 39:925–42. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01133-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Flores M, Toldrá F. Chemistry, safety, and regulatory considerations in the use of nitrite and nitrate from natural origin in meat products - invited review. Meat Sci. (2021) 171:108272. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108272

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Berends JE, van den Berg LMM, Guggeis MA, Henckens NFT, Hossein IJ, de Joode MEJR, et al. Consumption of nitrate-rich beetroot juice with or without vitamin C supplementation increases the excretion of urinary nitrate, nitrite, and n-nitroso compounds in humans. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:2277. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092277

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Keller RM, Beaver L, Prater MC, Hord NG. Dietary nitrate and nitrite concentrations in food patterns and dietary supplements. Nutr Today. (2020) 55:218–226. doi: 10.1097/NT.0000000000000253

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 (Text with EEA relevance) (2023).

Google Scholar

Keywords: nitrate, nitrite, dietary intake, nitrosamine, nitric oxide, health

Citation: Zhong L, Bondonno NP, Siervo M and Bondonno CP (2024) Editorial: Dietary nitrate: friend or foe. Front. Nutr. 11:1516811. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1516811

Received: 25 October 2024; Accepted: 11 November 2024;
Published: 26 November 2024.

Edited and reviewed by: Jayashree Arcot, University of New South Wales, Australia

Copyright © 2024 Zhong, Bondonno, Siervo and Bondonno. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Catherine P. Bondonno, Yy5ib25kb25ubyYjeDAwMDQwO2VjdS5lZHUuYXU=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.