The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Clinical Nutrition
Volume 11 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1502309
This article is part of the Research Topic Sarcopenia and Nutrition in Chronic Kidney Disease View all articles
The adductor pollicis muscle thickness is not associated with physical function, lean mass, and nutritional status in patients on maintenance hemodialysis
Provisionally accepted- 1 Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlândia, Brazil
- 2 Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Background: The adductor pollicis muscle thickness (APMT) may be associated with the muscle strength in patients on hemodialysis. However, the association of APMT with other physical function assessment tests has not yet been tested. Moreover, because it is considered a good nutritional indicator and not influenced by fluid overload, the APMT may be associated with the muscle mass and nutritional status of these patients. Therefore, the objective was to assess the association of APMT with physical function, muscle mass and nutritional status in patients on hemodialysis. Methods: The APMT was measured using a skinfold caliper between pollicis finger and index finger. Physical function was evaluated by handgrip strength (HGS), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), the sit-to-stand test, gait speed test, and timed up and go (TUG). Appendicular muscle mass index (AMMI) was estimated using bioelectrical impedance. The nutritional status was evaluated by the Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS). Results: Fifty-one patients were included, 60.8% men, mean age 58.4±12.6 years. There were no significant correlations of APMT with physical function, muscle mass and nutritional status. Values of APMT were not different between the groups according to adequate physical function or muscle mass. In the multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for sex, age and diabetes, APMT was not significantly associated with physical function tests, as HGS (β=0.101; p=0.778), gait speed (β=-0.014; p=0.180), SPPB (β=-0.054; p=0.590), TUG (β=0.202; p=0.109), lean mass (AMMI (β=0.058; p=0.147). Conclusion: There were no associations of APMT with physical function, muscle mass and nutritional status in patients on hemodialysis. We suggest APMT should 30 not be used in physical function and nutritional assessments of these patients.
Keywords: Chronic kidney failure, Dialysis, Nutritional assessment, physical functioning, Thumb adductor muscle
Received: 26 Sep 2024; Accepted: 30 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Morais, Trombim, Goes and Vogt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Barbara Perez Vogt, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlândia, Brazil
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.