Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.
Sec. Clinical Nutrition
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1493954
This article is part of the Research Topic Multidimensional Physiology: Novel Techniques and Discoveries with Bioimpedance Measurements, Volume II View all 3 articles

Quantitative Analysis of the Caloric Restriction versus Isocaloric Diets Models based on Macronutrients Composition: Impacts on Body Weight Regulation, Anthropometric and Bioimpedance Parameters in Women with Obesity

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Center for Molecular Research in Nephrology and Vascular Disease, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania, Timisoara, Romania
  • 2 Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Timis, Romania
  • 3 Discipline of Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Obesity is a growing public health issue, especially among young adults, with longterm management strategies still under debate. This prospective study compares the effects of caloric restriction and isocaloric diets with different macronutrient distributions on body composition and anthropometric parameters in obese women during a 12-week weight loss program, aiming to identify the most effective dietary strategies for managing obesity-related health outcomes.A certified clinical nutritionist assigned specific diets over a 12-week period to 150 participants, distributed as follows: hypocaloric diets-low-energy diet (LED, 31 subjects) and very low-energy diet (VLED, 13 subjects); isocaloric diets with macronutrient distribution-lowcarbohydrate diet (LCD, 48 subjects), ketogenic diet (KD, 23 subjects), and high-protein diet (HPD, 24 subjects); and isocaloric diet without macronutrient distribution-time-restricted eating (TRE, 11 subjects).Participants were dynamically monitored using anthropometric parameters: body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist to hip ratio (WHR) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) using the TANITA Body Composition Analyzer BC-418 MA III at three key intervals-baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks.The following parameters were evaluated: body weight, basal metabolic rate (BMR), percentage of total body fat, trunk fat, muscle mass, fat-free mass, and hydration status. Results: All diets led to weight loss, but differences emerged over time.The TRE model resulted in significantly less weight loss compared to LED at the final follow-up (6.30 kg, p<0.001), similar to the VLED (4.69 kg, p<0.001). Isocaloric diets with varied macronutrient distributions showed significant weight loss compared to LED (p<0.001). The KD reduced waist circumference at both 6 and 12 weeks (-4.08 cm, p<0.001), while significant differences in waist-to-hip ratio reduction were observed across diet groups at 12 weeks (p=0.01). Post-hoc analysis revealed significant fat mass differences at 12 weeks, with HPD outperforming IF (p=0.01) and VLED (p=0.003). LCD reduced trunk fat at 6 weeks (-2.36%, p=0.001) and 12 weeks (-3.79%, p<0.001). HPD increased muscle mass at 12 weeks (2.95%, p=0.001), while VLED decreased it (-2.02%, p=0.031). TRE showed a smaller BMR reduction at 12 weeks compared to LED.This study highlights the superior long-term benefits of isocaloric diets with macronutrients distribution over calorie-restrictive diets in optimizing weight, BMI, body composition, and central adiposity.

    Keywords: Obesity, Overweight, Macronutrient distribution, Body composition changes, Adipose Tissue, bioimpedance metrics

    Received: 10 Sep 2024; Accepted: 02 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 PESCARI, MIHUTA, Bena and STOIAN. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: MONICA SIMINA MIHUTA, Center for Molecular Research in Nephrology and Vascular Disease, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania, Timisoara, Romania

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.