Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1454286
This article is part of the Research Topic The Role of Foods, Diet, and Dietary Patterns in the Prevention and Management of Diabesity View all 4 articles

The Cardiometabolic Benefits of Okra-based Treatment in Prediabetes and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  • 2 Binaloud Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
  • 3 Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Fars, Iran
  • 4 Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  • 5 Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Tehran, Iran

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis examine the effects of okra consumption on cardiometabolic risk factors in individuals with prediabetes and diabetes. Okra is a widely consumed vegetable with potential health benefits, and understanding its impact on metabolic parameters in these populations is important.A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted up to May 2024 in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science to find relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) by using following keyword: ("okra" OR "okras" OR "abelmoschus esculentus") AND ("intervention" OR "controlled trial" OR "randomized" OR "randomized" OR "randomly" OR "clinical trial" OR "trial" OR "randomized controlled trial" OR "randomized clinical trial" OR "RCT" OR "blinded" OR "placebo" OR "Cross-Over" OR "parallel"). The selected trials were subjected to heterogeneity tests using the I² statistic. Random effects models were examined based on the heterogeneity tests, and the pooled data were calculated as weighted mean differences (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). In this meta-analysis, all the analyses were performed by using the STATA version 17 software.Results: Of the 1339 papers, nine eligible RCTs were included in the present meta-analysis. Our findings indicated that okra consumption significantly reduced total cholesterol (TC) levels (WMD: -14.40 mg/dl; (95% CI: -20.94 to -7.86); P< 0.001), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (WMD: -7.90 mg/dl; (95% CI: -13.30 to -2.48); P= 0.004), fasting blood glucose (FBG) (WMD:-39.58 mg/dl; (95% CI: -61.60 to -17.56); P< 0.001), and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) (WMD: -0.46 mg/dl; (95% CI: -0.79 to -0.13); P = 0.005). Overall effect size showed that okra intake failed to change triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), Insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), body weight, and body Mass Index (BMI) significantly.Conclusions: Okra decreased TC, LDL, FBG, and HbA1c levels in the intervention compared to the control group. A dose ≤ 3000 mg/day caused a significant decrease in TG, TC, LDL, HbA1c, and a significant increase in HDL. More study is needed to determine the optimum dose and duration of intervention.

    Keywords: Abelmoschus esculentus, okra, diabetes, Cardiometabolic risk factors, metaanalysis

    Received: 24 Jun 2024; Accepted: 02 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Bahari, Shahraki Jazinaki, Rahnama, Aghakhani, Amini and Malekahmadi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Hossein Bahari, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.