Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.
Sec. Clinical Nutrition
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1430668

The Association between Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and KSD Disease: Results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2018

Provisionally accepted
Zhicheng Tang Zhicheng Tang 1*Hongzheng Zhong Hongzheng Zhong 1*Qingqing Zhi Qingqing Zhi 1*Yinqiu Chen Yinqiu Chen 2*Jiahao Zhang Jiahao Zhang 1Zhibiao Li Zhibiao Li 1*Zechao Lu Zechao Lu 1Can Liu Can Liu 1*Fucai Tang Fucai Tang 1*Zhaohui He Zhaohui He 1*Xuan Sun Xuan Sun 1*
  • 1 Department of Urology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
  • 2 Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Kidney stone disease (KSD) is a widespread problem in urology. But the associations between the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), an important indicator for assessing the nutritional status of elderly hospitalized patients, and KSD are understudied.: Utilizing data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning 2007-2018, our study analyzed the correlation between the GNRI and KSD prevalence at cross-sectional level. The aim of the study was to explore the association between GNRI and the prevalence of KSD to identify potential risk factors and inform prevention and management strategies for KSD. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed data focusing on 26,803 adults (20-80 years) after screening for complete data. It evaluated GNRI, a formula involving albumin, present, and ideal body weight, stratifying participants into quartiles. The primary outcome was the history of KSD, based on self-reports. Covariates included demographic, health, and lifestyle factors. Statistical analysis employed t-tests, ANOVA, Wilcoxon, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, with logistic regression modeling GNRI's impact on KSD prevalence, assessing odds ratios and potential multicollinearity, and sensitivity analyses excluding individuals with low eGFR and adjusting cycle years.Results: Significant disparities are found in GNRI distributions between individuals with and without kidney stones. Higher GNRI levels are more common in kidney stone patients, with 39.249% in the highest quartile versus 33.334% in those without stones. Notably, those in the highest GNRI quartile (Q4) show a lower prevalence of kidney stone disease (KSD) than those in the lowest (Q1), with rates of 11.988% versus 8.631% respectively (P < 0.0001). Adjusted model results reveal that higher GNRI quartiles (Q3-Q4) correlate with reduced KSD prevalence, with odds ratios of 0.85 (95% CI [0.72, 1.00]) and 0.76 (95% CI [0.65, 0.89]). A nonlinear inverse relationship exists between GNRI levels and KSD prevalence across the population (P < 0.001), confirming that higher GNRI lowers KSD prevalence. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses support these findings.The study underscores a significant, albeit nonlinear, association between elevated GNRI levels and decreased KSD prevalence. This relationship highlights the importance of nutritional assessment and management in KSD prevention strategies.

    Keywords: GNRI (Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index), KSD (Kidney Stone Disease), NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), Nutritional Status, Risk factors

    Received: 22 May 2024; Accepted: 09 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Tang, Zhong, Zhi, Chen, Zhang, Li, Lu, Liu, Tang, He and Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Zhicheng Tang, Department of Urology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Hongzheng Zhong, Department of Urology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Qingqing Zhi, Department of Urology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Yinqiu Chen, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, Guangdong Province, China
    Zhibiao Li, Department of Urology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Can Liu, Department of Urology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Fucai Tang, Department of Urology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Zhaohui He, Department of Urology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Xuan Sun, Department of Urology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.