The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Food Policy and Economics
Volume 11 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1423599
Confronting Food Insecurity through Agricultural Interventions: The Farmer FIRST Programme in India
Provisionally accepted- 1 National Academy of Agricultural Research Management (ICAR), Hyderabad, India
- 2 Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
- 3 National Institute of Biotic Stress Management, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
- 4 Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, Delhi, India
The Farmer, Farm, Innovation, Resources, Science, and Technology (FIRST) programme is a national-level agricultural intervention programme started in 2016 by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research to transform the lives and livelihood of Indian farmers to emphasise income and livelihood security. This programme envisages agricultural interventions ensuring national food security goals, with improved agricultural practices, enhanced food production, and increased access to nutritious food, especially for vulnerable populations.Methods: This study aims to investigate the food security improvement resulting from implementing nutrition-sensitive interventions introduced under the Farmer FIRST Programme (FFP) in 15 agroecological zones. Four key indicators were employed to assess food security in the technology-focused field intervention: food availability, purchasing power, food gap, and food diversity. Food availability was measured at the macro level (state or national) using per capita food availability. However, at micro level, particularly for farmers who produce their food and are secure in terms of availability, yield increases from the selected interventions under FFP served as an alternative measure. Purchasing power was assessed by the additional income generated to buy food during the off-season. The food gap was assessed using the Cereal Equivalent Quantity (CEQ), which captures an aspect of consumers' nutritional security. Its impact in India was evaluated using the Propensity Score Matching technique with the Difference-in-Difference measure to estimate the unbiased overall effect on food security. Food diversity was captured using Barry's index. Result: A sample of 2282 respondents was interviewed from 2016-2020 to elicit data on the prevalence of undernutrition in India, which is 16.3%. The results revealed that Post-intervention of FFP, cereal availability increased by 147.74% in the Northern Plain, while pulses recorded over 200% growth in three regions. The Incremental per capita farm income exceeded INR 20,000 in several zones, with the Northern Plain showing an increase of over 21 times. Food diversity improved marginally, supported by the Integrated Farming System. Overall, FFP interventions transformed nutritional security, benefiting 1,915 households, particularly in regions with historically low-calorie intake, thereby demonstrating substantial gains in food security and living standards. Conclusion: The FFP has significantly improved dietary intake among participating households, enhancing food security.
Keywords: agroecological zones, Cereal Equivalent Quantity, Farmer FIRST Programme, Interventions, Food security
Received: 26 Apr 2024; Accepted: 10 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 VENKATESAN, Sivaramane, Rao, Venkattakumar, Sivakumar, Palanisamy, Burman, Kalyani and Challa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
PURUSHOTHAMAN VENKATESAN, National Academy of Agricultural Research Management (ICAR), Hyderabad, India
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.