Danielle Heaney
Olga I. Padilla-Zakour*
Chang Chen- Department of Food Science, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, United States
Indigenous foods are carriers of traditional native North American food culture and living philosophy. They are featured by the wide varieties in fresh and processed forms, richness in nutrition, flavor, health benefits and diversity in origins, but are usually misunderstood or underrepresented in the modern food systems. Conventional processing and cooking methods are sometimes labor-intensive, less efficient and lack science-based guidelines to prevent unseen safety risks and food loss. Global and regional climate change have caused additional challenges to conventional cooking/processing, and increased native communities’ reliance on externally produced foods, which have resulted in increasing nutritional unbalance and prevalence of diet-related health issues. Current and emerging technologies, such as storage and packaging, drying, safety processing, canning, pickling, and fermentation, which treat foods under optimized conditions to improve the safety and extend the shelf-life, are increasingly used in current food systems. Therefore, exploring these technologies for indigenous foods offers opportunities to better preserve their nutrition, safety, and accessibility, and is critical for the sovereignty and independence of indigenous food systems, and sustainability of indigenous food culture. This mini-review focuses on identifying adoptable processing and preservation technologies for selected traditional indigenous foods in North America, summarizing education, extension, and outreach resources and discussing the current challenges and future needs critical to expanding knowledge about indigenous foods and improving food sovereignty, nutrition security, and health equity.
Introduction
‘Indigenous Food Sovereignty’ is a concept drawing increasing attention (1), which states native people have ‘the right to produce healthy and culturally appropriate food through ecologically sound and sustainable methods’ (2). However, contemporary diets and increased reliance on externally produced foods have threatened the sovereignty and sustainability of native food systems and culture (3). Over-consumption of hyper-processed, calorie-dense, convenient foods has led to nutritional imbalances and increased diet-related health challenges, particularly among indigenous populations in the North America (4). Prevalence of type-II diabetes and cardiovascular diseases among indigenous populations were reported 16.5% higher, and the average life expectancy 5.2 years shorter than other races in America (5, 6). Global climate change has also resulted in challenges and uncertainty. For example, elevated ambient temperatures and more intensive rainfalls have increased emergence of crop diseases and pest damage, making food more vulnerable to decay and safety risks (7). Indigenous foods are featured by their diversity, nutritional value, and freshness, but can decay rapidly due to physical, chemical and/or microbiological changes if they are not preserved or processed appropriately (8). Processing is essential to extend the shelf life and accessibility of foods and avoid food loss. Therefore, to aid food sovereignty, food processing techniques need to be adapted to fit indigenous values.
Practicing food sovereignty in native communities is highly encouraged (9), but available information on suitable processing/preservation technologies for indigenous foods and their attributes, nutrition, safety and accessibility is limited. Instead, identifying and adopting suitable technologies for the indigenous food systems should be based on the knowledge of food attributes and their relationships with the processing/preservation conditions, while respecting the indigenous food cultures. Although numerous food processing/preservation technologies have been developed, translation and dissemination of these research outcomes to indigenous communities is limited. Addressing this will require extra efforts from institutions/agencies to identify the needs and develop suitable extension, outreach and education materials/activities, with proper and proactive communications.
Therefore, this mini-review aims to (1) identify and discuss emerging and accessible technologies that can help improve food safety and shelf life, preserve the nutritional value of indigenous foods, and sustain the native food culture (Figure 1); and (2) summarize the available education, extension and outreach resources. It is envisioned that this study can provide complementary information to the current reported efforts from cultural, ecological and public health perspectives (10, 11), and contribute to a more resilient indigenous food system.
Figure 1. Contributions and applications of a virtualized food. Current preservation/processing technologies and indigenous food sovereignty, nutrition security and health equity.
Preserving and processing technologies
Several commodity groups have been identified as important to indigenous people in North America and are summarized in Table 1. Grains, nuts, fruits, vegetable pulses, and animal proteins are among the most commonly reported (12), typically processed through refrigeration, freezing, baking, sun-drying, and roasting (21). Scoping applications of food technologies to these main commodity groups may prove a valuable resource for the creation of extension resources to improve indigenous food sovereignty while upholding their desires, needs, and values. Therefore, this paper evaluates successful applications of various food technologies to grains, nuts, fruits, vegetable pulses, and animal proteins and delineates the benefits of each technology. These technologies are summarized in Table 2.
Table 1. Important food commodities for native groups in Northeast America.
Table 2. Processing and preservation technologies that offer opportunities for indigenous foods.
Food safety risks may increase if the foods are not preserved or processed properly. Pathogenic microorganisms among the biggest risks resulting in significant numbers of foodborne illnesses in the United States. Recent outbreaks in the US have traced back to eggs, meats, nuts, grains, fruits and vegetables (35). Chemical safety risks could also emerge due to inappropriate processing and cooking. For example, baking or roasting could form acrylamide, a group 2A carcinogen in bakery or meat products (36, 37). Smoking could generate carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in foods (38). This section also evaluates suitable processing technologies to improve the safety and shelf-life of conventional indigenous foods.
Food storage and packaging
Proper storage methods are critical to ensure safety, prolong shelf-life and accessibility, and preserve nutrition and quality of natively consumed crops and wild games. Under uncontrolled storage conditions, quality decay and microbial growth could accelerate due to ripening and/or contamination as affected by the relative humidity (RH), temperature, and atmospheric composition (22). Freshly harvested fruits and vegetables mature and respire, losing moisture, releasing CO2 and undergoing biochemical reactions which alter antioxidants, proteins, carbohydrates, and color (39). Therefore, extension and outreach resources which suggest proper storage conditions and packaging can contribute significantly to the indigenous food sovereignty.
• Cold storage: Refrigeration (0–5°C) slows food respiration, reducing biochemical changes. From a quality standpoint, refrigerated storage could better maintain the firmness of tomatoes, snap beans, and blueberries (17, 40, 41), and minimize color changes (15, 42, 43). The microbial growth in other fruits, including blueberries, strawberries, grapes, and cranberries, can also be suppressed under proper storage conditions (44). Freezing (<−18°C) can further extend storage stability, particularly for meat and fish (33, 45). Suitable storage temperature and time depend highly on the food’s properties and maturity. Inappropriate refrigeration may lead to chilling injury or growth of large ice crystals in the food cells, which may counterproductively result in texture softening, discoloration, and loss of nutrition (16, 46). Indigenous communities also have the option to create and monitor suitable storage conditions at home following the recommendations of the National Center for Home Food Preservation (47).
• Packaging: Packaging also extends foods’ shelf life by providing a barrier for moisture, oxygen, and light, defending against pathogens and animals, and generating suitable gas compositions for food quality preservation. A variety of materials can be used for food packaging. Low density polyethylene bags improve cucumber shelf-life compared to aluminum foil and open-air storage (48). Metal cans and glass jars are rigid and thus suitable for processed foods like pickled vegetables or liquids (32). Vacuum sealing can significantly reduce moisture loss, protein degradation, lipid oxidation and texture toughening in wild-games before cold storage (49). More advanced storage facilities with microbial control (using ultraviolet and/or ozone generators) and modified atmosphere (e.g., low O2 and higher CO2, ethylene absorbers) can suppress the respiration and ethylene generation rates of fresh produces and work more effectively under refrigerated conditions (50, 51).
Drying and smoking
Drying/dehydration is one of the most traditional ways of food preservation (52). Low moisture and intermediate moisture foods have extended shelf-life. Reducing the moisture content and water activity of harvested foods can avoid pathogenic microbial growth, mycotoxin formation, decay, or spoilage (53). The sun and wind are considered as gifts by the Creator to the native people (54), and have been widely used to dry corns, beans, squashes, berries, and other fruits, vegetables and wild games in many indigenous cultures (12). However, weather conditions (>30°C, <60% humidity) can be a major concern with sun drying. The increased occurrence of intensive rainfalls in parts of North America (e.g., Northeast) during summer and early fall (when ambient temperature is >30°C) has significantly limited sun drying’s feasibility and led to food loss due to insufficient or delayed drying (55, 56). To improve the drying efficiency and better preserve foods, other drying technologies can be used.
• Indirect sun drying (ISD): Instead of heating the foods under open sun, ISD effectively collects solar radiation through a black corrugated metal sheet to heat up the air (57). A centrifugal fan is usually used to circulate the dry heated air into a drying chamber to dehydrate the foods. Compared to open sun drying, ISD enhances drying efficiency with relatively low capital and operational costs (21).
• Hot air drying (HAD): HAD relies on forced convective heat/mass transfer from electrically heated air to accelerate the drying process and is suitable for solid foods drying (23). HAD efficiency is independent of weather conditions, representing an affordable option for indigenous communities.
• Infrared (IR)-assisted drying: IR is part of the electromagnetic spectrum and the main ‘heating source’ in the sunlight. IR drying relies on radiative heat transfer to heat up the water rapidly and selectively within foods (58). Such characteristics make IR drying more intensive than convective drying, and thus suitable for surface pre-drying or thin object drying (24). IR drying has also been used to assist HAD for more efficient processing (59).
• Freeze-drying: Freeze-drying happens under vacuum and at low temperatures, where water evaporates through sublimation from pre-frozen foods. For heat sensitive foods and high-quality products, freeze-drying is the best option, but it is expensive and slow. Newer units for small-scale and household use are opening applications (60).
• Smoking: Smoking is a traditional method indigenous people use to preserve meat products like bison, fish, and venison (19). Besides the safety risks of PAHs and PCBs formation, the non-uniform heating during open fire or direct flame smoking may result in hot and cold spots in the foods, which may lead to burning, acrylamide formation, and inadequate pasteurization (61). To address these concerns, gas smokers can be used. In gas smokers, the cooking and smoking chambers are separated; smoke is delivered via convection to improve the uniformity, and foods are placed on metal trays to avoid oil dripping onto charcoals, which can significantly decrease the PAH emission (30).
It should be noted that high temperature and long drying time may cause discoloration of foods, texture shrinkage and hardening, poor organoleptic qualities, and loss of nutrients (62, 63). Therefore, it is critical to select suitable drying conditions based on the characteristics of the indigenous foods.
Thermal and nonthermal processing
• Thermal processing: Hot water treatment is an effective and accessible method at both home and production scales to pasteurize foods. Hot water treatment at 65°C for 20 min can kill or inactivate most vegetative cells of pathogenic microorganisms, such as Shigella, Salmonella, and enterotoxigenic E. coli (26). Retort technologies for canned foods are available at multiple scales to achieve effective pasteurization or sterilization. Canning at high temperatures (~121°C) and anaerobic conditions are used to extend shelf-life of low acid foods. However, incorrect practices such as under processing or time–temperature abuse can lead to serious consequences, like botulism. High temperatures during canning can lead to undesirable changes like losses of vitamins (64), β-elimination reactions leading to softening especially under high pH (65), and loss of Mg2+ from chlorophyll in green foods, converting it to the yellow-brown pheophytin compound (66). Adjustments should be considered for improved processing of indigenous foods, such as addition of sodium carbonate to blanching water to improve color and monitoring the time–temperature conditions depending on the product to achieve commercial sterility (25). Besides for drying purpose, IR heating can be used as a dry-pasteurization technology. IR heating at 120°C then holding at 90°C for 10–15 min reduced the Pediococcus level on almonds by more than 5-log (67). IR heating of shelled corn at 3.24 kW/m2 intensity for 150 s resulted in more than 5.9 Log CFU/g reductions of Aspergillus flavus (68).
• Nonthermal processing: For fresh produce with heat-sensitive nutrients, nonthermal technologies can be used to disinfect the food surfaces and preserve quality (69). For example, ultraviolet treatment can be used to effectively reduce the levels of E. coli ATCC 11775 on lettuce, grape tomatoes and carrots (34), as well as fruit juice while maintaining desirable nutritional and sensory properties (70). Other novel nonthermal processing technologies (such as high-pressure processing, pulsed electric field, cold plasma, ionized irradiation, etc.) and hurdle technologies are used in food industries, but may not suit indigenous communities in the current stage due to expensive, specialized infrastructure requirements. Fermentation and acidification are established and accessible technologies.
Blanching, pickling and fermentation
For long term storage of seasonal native crops with poor stability, blanching, pickling, and fermentation are useful preservation methods to ensure retention of texture, color, flavor attributes, and availability, strengthening food security. Recommendations based on particular product conditions like pH and salt level could improve both the safety and quality of indigenous foods.
• Blanching: As a common pretreatment to canning and pickling, blanching involves immersing foods in hot water or steam, then quickly cooling. Blanching elongates shelf-life by altering cell permeability and deactivating the enzymes responsible for the biochemical reactions during food decay. It can also improve the efficiency of subsequent processes like drying, freezing, or canning (18, 71). Deactivating peroxidase and lipoxygenase (90°C-100°C) can mitigate browning, rancidification and off-flavors (64); activating pectin methylesterase (50°C-70°C) in vegetables leads to texture firming through pectin de-esterification when followed by calcium gelation (72); deactivating polygalacturonase (around 80°C) prevents depolymerization of pectic acids, which results in softening. Blanching can also brighten food color, as it allows permeating water to remove intercellular gas for better light reflection (25).
• Pickling and Fermenting: Pickling and fermentation preserve fresh flavors and nutrients and add unique flavors and/or probiotics (29). During fermentation, natural or added microbes metabolize sugars in the food, producing ethanol (alcoholic beverages), CO2, and lactic acid which decreases the pH below 4.6 and creates an environment that is safe from most pathogens. During pickling, acetic acid and/or salt are added to achieve a pH below 4.6 without the assistance of microorganisms, to prevent botulism. A heat treatment or pasteurization step at temperatures between 70 and 90°C can be used to ensure safety under anaerobic conditions. Fermentation of meats, fish, and vegetables have existed as a part of the traditional indigenous diet (73, 74). Frybread, a fermented wheat bread, is commonly consumed since the introduction of wheat to North America (75). Unsafe pickling and fermenting practices can lead to botulism (73), thus the pH, redox potential, water activity, and storage temperature need to be controlled carefully (29).
Introduction of portable and accessible instrumentation to monitor food processes can improve food safety and quality for food sovereignty of indigenous groups. This includes pH meters, pH test strips, water activity meters, and thermometers capable of measuring internal food temperature, and monitoring fermentation vessels.
Extension and education resources
Education and extension materials/activities are critical to disseminate the optimal technologies and food knowledge to indigenous communities for the preservation of food quality and safety. Currently available resources offered by different institutions and agencies are summarized:
• The USDA Indigenous Food Sovereignty Initiative, in partnership with tribal-serving organizations, seeks to promote traditional indigenous foods and agriculture, targeting foods that meet dietary needs. It includes educational series for children, cooking videos, and guides on foraging and harvesting indigenous plants (76).
• The Federally-Recognized Tribes Extension Program (FRTEP) supports federally recognized Indian Reservations and Tribal jurisdictions by leveraging government resources with tribal leadership through programs centered on youth education, traditional agriculture, sustainability, and community development, in collaboration with land-grant universities (77).
• The Native American Food Sovereignty Alliance has programs to help advocate and support food sovereignty, including the indigenous Seed Keepers Network that provides mentorship to famers and gardeners to reclaim and produce quality seeds for traditional indigenous foods; the Native Food & Culinary program that intents to reconnect indigenous groups with traditional diets; and the food sovereignty events (78).
• The Indigenous Food Wellness Circle program, focused on the indigenous medicine wheel, offers training courses, educational videos and resources on native nutrition, food safety, cooking demonstrations, and food preservation (79).
• The First Nations Development Institute created the Nourishing Native Foods & Health program to support tribes and native communities to establish sustainable food systems. The Native Farm to School project offers educational resources that integrate traditional foods and practices into school curricula, promoting health, self-reliance, and sustainability (80).
• The Woodland Indian Educational Programs provide guidelines for sun drying, smoking foods, and storing foods (81).
• The North American Traditional Indigenous Food Systems established the Indigenous Food Lab, a professional kitchen and training center that covers indigenous food production and preparation for food service (82).
• The United Tribes Technical College offers The Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems Applied Science (AAS) degree program, which trains students in food production, nutrition, food preservation and storage, integrating tribal, cultural and traditional ecological knowledge (83).
• The University of Wisconsin-Madison Division of Extension Native Nations Team (84) and the College of Menominee Nation (85) are examples of institutions focusing on education to strengthen tribal food sovereignty and training in sustainable agriculture. They offer programs that engage youth in traditional foodways and support local economies through community food systems.
• The National Center for Home Food Preservation provides current science-based recommendations to process and preserve foods at home (2024).
Conclusion and recommendations
Creating extension and outreach resources which summarize the applications of these preservation and processing technologies to indigenous commodity groups could make foods more stable, accessible, and safe, which support the food sovereignty. Mechanical drying technologies efficiently remove moisture and make foods stay longer; Thermal and nonthermal processes effectively reduce the microbial and chemical safety risks; Fermenting and pickling improve the nutritional value and flavor profile; Appropriate cold storage and packaging slow down the food spoilage and nutrition loss. Many of the abovementioned technologies are readily available at different scales inside and outside of indigenous communities. Despite these potential benefits and flexibility, several challenges remain for the wide adoption of them in nations.
Firstly, studies on processing and quality of North America indigenous foods are still limited in scientific research, which would provide the most direct information for indigenous people, and require interdisciplinary efforts from food science, engineering, nutrition, and health. Secondly, successful dissemination of food knowledge and resources relies on more effective and dedicated education, extension and outreach programs/initiatives. Finally, communication based on care and respect, and appreciation of the native food culture is critical for the alignment with the needs of the indigenous people and technology transfer. Addressing these will require universities/institutions, government agencies and private sectors to collaborate. While this type of collaboration may be a challenge, each agency is a stakeholder because enhancing the food sovereignty, nutrition security, and health equity in the underrepresented indigenous communities will contribute to a more sustainable global food system.
Author contributions
DH: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. OP-Z: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The project is partially funding provided by USDA NIFA Multistate NC1023 project NYG-623810 under #7001076.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Blue Bird Jernigan, V, Maudrie, TL, Nikolaus, CJ, Benally, T, Johnson, S, Teague, T, et al. Food sovereignty indicators for indigenous community capacity building and health. Front Sustain Food Syst. (2021) 5:704750. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.704750
2. Weiler, AM, Hergesheimer, C, Brisbois, B, Wittman, H, Yassi, A, and Spiegel, JM. Food sovereignty, food security and health equity: a meta-narrative mapping exercise. Health Policy Plan. (2015) 30:1078–92. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu109
3. Fardet, A, and Rock, E. Ultra-processed foods and food system sustainability: what are the links? Sustain For. (2020) 12:6280. doi: 10.3390/su12156280
4. Gibney, MJ, Forde, CG, Mullally, D, and Gibney, ER. Ultra-processed foods in human health: a critical appraisal. Am J Clin Nutr. (2017) 106:717–24. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.160440
5. CfDCaP, CDC . National diabetes statistics report, 2017. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services (2017).
6. Sarkar, D, Walker-Swaney, J, and Shetty, K. Food diversity and indigenous food systems to combat diet-linked chronic diseases. Current developments in nutrition. (2020) 4:3–11. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzz099
7. Lamie, C., Lamie, C., Bader, D., Graziano, K., Horton, R., and John, K. (2024). New York State’s changing climate. New York State Climate Impacts Assessment, retrieved from https://nysclimateimpacts.org/
8. Peleg, M, Normand, MD, and Corradini, MG. A new look at kinetics in relation to food storage. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. (2017) 8:135–53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-030216-025915
9. Gurney, RM, Caniglia, BS, Mix, TL, and Baum, KA. Native American food security and traditional foods: a review of the literature. Sociol Compass. (2015) 9:681–93. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12284
10. Coté, C . “Indigenizing” food sovereignty. Revitalizing indigenous food practices and ecological knowledges in Canada and the United States. Humanities. (2016) 5:57. doi: 10.3390/h5030057
11. Whyte, K. (2016). Indigenous food sovereignty, renewal and US settler colonialism. In The Routledge handbook of food ethics. United Kingdom: Routledge, pp. 354–365.
12. Knorr, D, and Augustin, MA. Preserving the food preservation legacy. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2023) 63:9519–38. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2065459
13. Shah, Niyati . (2016). 20 native north American foods with stories to tell. Retreived from: https://foodtank.com/news/2016/07/indigenous-foods-historically-and-culturally-important-to-north-americ/. Accessed on 05/17/2024.
14. Nam, JS, Park, SY, Oh, HJ, Jang, HL, and Rhee, YH. Phenolic profiles, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of pawpaw pulp (Asimina triloba [L.] Dunal) at different ripening stages. J Food Sci. (2019) 84:174–82. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14414
15. Alvarez, MV, Ponce, AG, and Moreira, MR. Combined effect of bioactive compounds and storage temperature on sensory quality and safety of minimally processed celery, leek and butternut squash. J Food Saf. (2015) 35:560–74. doi: 10.1111/jfs.12206
16. Massolo, JF, Zarauza, JM, Hasperué, JH, Rodoni, LM, and Vicente, AR. Maturity at harvest and postharvest quality of summer squash. Pesq Agrop Brasileira. (2019) 54:e00133. doi: 10.1590/s1678-3921.pab2019.v54.00133
17. Proulx, E, Yagiz, Y, Cecilia, M, Nunes, N, and Emond, JP. Quality attributes limiting snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) postharvest life at chilling and non-chilling temperatures. HortScience. (2010) 45:1238–49. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.45.8.1238
18. Manzoor, N, Dar, AH, Khan, S, and Makroo, HRH. Effect of blanching and drying temperatures on various Physico-chemical characteristics of green beans. Asian journal of dairy and food. Demogr Res. (2019) 38, 213–223. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-1430
19. Park, S, Hongu, N, and Daily, JW III. Native American foods: history, culture, and influence on modern diets. J Ethnic Foods. (2016) 3:171–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jef.2016.08.001
20. Ahmed, F, Liberda, EN, Solomon, A, Davey, R, Sutherland, B, and Tsuji, LJ. Indigenous land-based approaches to well-being: the Amisk (beaver) harvesting program in subarctic Ontario, Canada. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:7335. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127335
21. Essalhi, H, Benchrifa, M, Tadili, R, and Bargach, MN. Experimental and theoretical analysis of drying grapes under an indirect solar dryer and in open sun. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2018) 49:58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.08.002
22. Meng, X, Chen, C, Song, T, Xu, J, Zhang, X, Wang, J, et al. Effect of nano-silica coating combined with pressurized Ar treatment on postharvest quality and reactive oxygen species metabolism in sweet cherry fruit. Food Chem. (2022) 374:131715. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131715
23. Chen, C, Wongso, I, Putnam, D, Khir, R, and Pan, Z. Effect of hot air and infrared drying on the retention of cannabidiol and terpenes in industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Ind Crop Prod. (2021) 172:114051. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114051
24. Pan, Z, Khir, R, Godfrey, LD, Lewis, R, Thompson, JF, and Salim, A. Feasibility of simultaneous rough rice drying and disinfestations by infrared radiation heating and rice milling quality. J Food Eng. (2008) 84:469–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.06.005
25. Fellows, PJ . Blanching In: PJ Fellows , editor. Food processing technology (third edition). Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing (2009). 369–80.
26. Teixeira, AA . Thermal food preservation techniques (pasteurization, sterilization, canning and blanching). In: S Bhattacharya , editor. Conventional and advanced food processing technologies. (2014):115–28. doi: 10.1002/9781118406281.ch6
27. Derossi, A, Fiore, AG, De Pilli, T, and Severini, C. A review on acidifying treatments for vegetable canned food. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2011) 51:955–64. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.491163
28. Pérez-Gregorio, MR, Regueiro, J, Alonso-González, E, Pastrana-Castro, LM, and Simal-Gándara, J. Influence of alcoholic fermentation process on antioxidant activity and phenolic levels from mulberries (Morus nigra L.). LWT-food. Sci Technol. (2011) 44:1793–801. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.03.007
29. Ghnimi, S, and Guizani, N. Vegetable fermentation and pickling In: NK Sinha , editor. Handbook of vegetables and vegetable processing. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (2018). 407–27.
30. Dzikunoo, J, Letsyo, E, Adams, Z, Asante-Donyinah, D, and Dzah, CS. Ghana's indigenous food technology: A review of the processing, safety, packaging techniques and advances in food science and technology. Food Control. (2021) 127:108116. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108116
31. Padilla-Zakour, OI . Good manufacturing practices. In: N Heredia, I Wesley, and S Garcia, editor. Microbiologically safe foods. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons (2009): 395–414. doi: 10.1002/9780470439074.ch20
32. Moake, MM, Padilla-Zakour, OI, and Worobo, RW. Comprehensive review of patulin control methods in foods. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. (2005) 4:8–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2005.tb00068.x
33. Sampels, S . The effects of storage and preservation technologies on the quality of fish products: A review. J Food Process Preserv. (2015) 39:1206–15. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.12337
34. Bermúdez-Aguirre, D, and Barbosa-Cánovas, GV. Disinfection of selected vegetables under nonthermal treatments: chlorine, acid citric, ultraviolet light and ozone. Food Control. (2013) 29:82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.05.073
35. Holley, RA . Food safety challenges within north American free trade agreement (NAFTA) partners. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. (2011) 10:131–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00143.x
36. Keramat, J, LeBail, A, Prost, C, and Jafari, M. Acrylamide in baking products: a review article. Food Bioprocess Technol. (2011) 4:530–43. doi: 10.1007/s11947-010-0495-1
37. Lingnert, H, Grivas, S, Jägerstad, M, Skog, K, Törnqvist, M, and Åman, P. Acrylamide in food: mechanisms of formation and influencing factors during heating of foods. Scand J Nutr. (2002) 46:159–72. doi: 10.1080/110264802762225273
38. Fellows, PJ . Smoking In: PJ Fellows , editor. Woodhead publishing series in food science, technology and nutrition, food processing technology (fourth edition). Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing (2017). 717–32.
39. El-Ramady, HR, Domokos-Szabolcsy, É, Abdalla, NA, Taha, HS, and Fári, M. Postharvest management of fruits and vegetables storage. Sustain Agricul Rev. (2015) 15:65–152. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-09132-7_2
40. Chen, H, Cao, S, Fang, X, Mu, H, Yang, H, Wang, X, et al. Changes in fruit firmness, cell wall composition and cell wall degrading enzymes in postharvest blueberries during storage. Sci Hortic. (2015) 188:44–8. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.03.018
41. Lana, MM, Tijskens, LMM, and Van Kooten, O. Effects of storage temperature and fruit ripening on firmness of fresh cut tomatoes. Postharvest Biol Technol. (2005) 35:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.07.001
42. Manjunatha, M, and Anurag, RK. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging and storage conditions on quality characteristics of cucumber. J Food Sci Technol. (2014) 51:3470–5. doi: 10.1007/s13197-012-0840-7
43. Muga, CF, Marenya, OM, and Workneh, ST. Effect of temperature, relative humidity and moisture on aflatoxin contamination of stored maize kernels. Bulgarian J Agr Sci. (2019) 25:271–7.
44. Huynh, NK, Wilson, MD, Eyles, A, and Stanley, RA. Recent advances in postharvest technologies to extend the shelf life of blueberries (Vaccinium sp.), raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) and blackberries (Rubus sp.). J Berry Res. (2019) 9:687–707. doi: 10.3233/JBR-190421
45. Kasałka-Czarna, N, Bilska, A, Biegańska-Marecik, R, and Montowska, M. The effect of storage method on selected physicochemical and microbiological qualities of wild boar meat. J Sci Food Agric. (2022) 102:5250–60. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11878
46. Kaale, LD, and Eikevik, TM. The development of ice crystals in food products during the superchilling process and following storage, a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2014) 39:91–103. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.07.004
47. National Center for Home Food Preservation . Available at: https://nchfp.uga.edu/#gsc.tab=0 accessed February 17 (2024).
48. Jahan, SE, Hassan, MK, Roy, S, Ahmed, QM, Hasan, GN, Muna, AY, et al. Effects of different postharvest treatments on nutritional quality and shelf life of cucumber. Asian J Crop Soil Sci Plant Nutr. (2020) 2:51–61. doi: 10.18801/ajcsp.020120.08
49. Kasałka-Czarna, N, Biegańska-Marecik, R, Proch, J, Orłowska, A, and Montowska, M. Effect of dry, vacuum, and modified atmosphere ageing on physicochemical properties of roe deer meat. Polish J Food and Nutrition Sci. (2023) 73:175–86. doi: 10.31883/pjfns/163613
50. Concha-Meyer, A, Eifert, JD, Williams, RC, Marcy, JE, and Welbaum, GE. Shelf life determination of fresh blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum) stored under controlled atmosphere and ozone. Int J Food Sci. (2015) 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2015/164143
51. Pasha, HY, Mohtasebi, SS, Tajeddin, B, Taherimehr, M, Tabatabaeekoloor, R, Firouz, MS, et al. The effect of a new bionanocomposite packaging film on postharvest quality of strawberry at modified atmosphere condition. Food Bioprocess Technol. (2023) 16:1246–57. doi: 10.1007/s11947-022-02968-0
52. Chen, C, Venkitasamy, C, Zhang, W, Deng, L, Meng, X, and Pan, Z. Effect of step-down temperature drying on energy consumption and product quality of walnuts. J Food Eng. (2020) 285:110105. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110105
53. Roberts, JS, Kidd, DR, and Padilla-Zakour, O. Drying kinetics of grape seeds. J Food Eng. (2008) 89:460–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.05.030
54. Turner, NJ, and Reid, AJ. “When the wild roses bloom”: indigenous knowledge and environmental change in northwestern North America. GeoHealth. (2022) 6:e2022GH000612. doi: 10.1029/2022GH000612
55. Chen, C, and Pan, Z. Postharvest processing of tree nuts: current status and future prospects—A comprehensive review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. (2022) 21:1702–31. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12906
56. Piacentini, RD, and Mujumdar, AS. Climate change and drying of agricultural products. Dry Technol. (2009) 27:629–35. doi: 10.1080/07373930902820770
57. Ouaabou, R, Nabil, B, Ouhammou, M, Idlimam, A, Lamharrar, A, Ennahli, S, et al. Impact of solar drying process on drying kinetics, and on bioactive profile of Moroccan sweet cherry. Renew Energy. (2020) 151:908–18. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.078
58. Chen, C. (2021). Characteristics and mechanisms of walnut drying under hot air and infrared heating (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis).
59. Chen, C, Wang, K, Wongso, I, Ning, Z, Khir, R, Putnam, D, et al. Postharvest blanching and drying of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) with infrared and hot air heating for enhanced processing efficiency and microbial inactivation. Dry Technol. (2023) 41:1454–68. doi: 10.1080/07373937.2022.2159973
60. Pan, Z, Shih, C, McHugh, TH, and Hirschberg, E. Study of banana dehydration using sequential infrared radiation heating and freeze-drying. LWT-Food Sci Technol. (2008) 41:1944–51. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2008.01.019
61. Lingbeck, JM, Cordero, P, O'Bryan, CA, Johnson, MG, Ricke, SC, and Crandall, PG. Functionality of liquid smoke as an all-natural antimicrobial in food preservation. Meat Sci. (2014) 97:197–206. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.02.003
62. Sablani, SS . Drying of fruits and vegetables: retention of nutritional/functional quality. Dry Technol. (2006) 24:123–35. doi: 10.1080/07373930600558904
63. Zhang, W, Pan, Z, Xiao, H, Zheng, Z, Chen, C, and Gao, Z. Pulsed vacuum drying (PVD) technology improves drying efficiency and quality of Poria cubes. Dry Technol. (2018) 36:908–21. doi: 10.1080/07373937.2017.1362647
64. Kaack, K . Blanching of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Plant Foods for Human Nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands). (1994) 46:353–60. doi: 10.1007/BF01088436
65. Sila, DN, Smout, C, Elliot, F, Loey, AV, and Hendrickx, M. Non-enzymatic Depolymerization of carrot pectin: toward a better understanding of carrot texture during thermal processing. J Food Sci. (2006) 71:E1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.tb12391.x
66. Ferreira, SS, Monteiro, F, Passos, CP, Silva, AMS, Wessel, DF, Coimbra, MA, et al. Blanching impact on pigments, glucosinolates, and phenolics of dehydrated broccoli by-products. Food Res Int. (2020) 132:109055. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109055
67. Bingol, G, Yang, J, Brandl, MT, Pan, Z, Wang, H, and McHugh, TH. Infrared pasteurization of raw almonds. J Food Eng. (2011) 104:387–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.12.034
68. Smith, DL, Atungulu, GG, Wilson, SA, and MohammadiShad, Z. Deterrence of aspergillus flavus regrowth and aflatoxin accumulation on shelled corn using infrared heat treatments. Appl Eng Agric. (2020) 36:151–8. doi: 10.13031/aea.13722
69. Deng, LZ, Mujumdar, AS, Pan, Z, Vidyarthi, SK, Xu, J, Zielinska, M, et al. Emerging chemical and physical disinfection technologies of fruits and vegetables: a comprehensive review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2020) 60:2481–508. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1649633
70. Chen, H, and Moraru, C. Synergistic effects of sequential light treatment with 222-nm/405-nm and 280-nm/405-nm wavelengths on inactivation of foodborne pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol. (2023) 89:e00650–23. doi: 10.1128/aem.00650-23
71. Rickman, JC, Barrett, DM, and Bruhn, CM. Nutritional comparison of fresh, frozen and canned fruits and vegetables. Part 1. Vitamins C and B and phenolic compounds. J Sci Food Agric. (2007) 87:930–44. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2825
72. Ni, L, Lin, D, and Barrett, DM. Pectin methylesterase catalyzed firming effects on low temperature blanched vegetables. J Food Eng. (2005) 70:546–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.10.009
73. Chiou, LA, Hennessy, TW, Horn, A, Carter, G, and Butler, JC. Botulism among Alaska natives in the Bristol Bay area of Southwest Alaska: A survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to fermented foods known to cause botulism. Int J Circumpolar Health. (2002) 61:50–60. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v61i1.17405
74. Ramos, CL, Bressani, AP, Batista, NN, Martinez, SJ, Dias, DR, and Schwan, RF. Indigenous fermented foods: nutritional and safety aspects. Curr Opin Food Sci. (2023) 53:101075. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2023.101075
75. Smith, J, and Wiedman, D. Fat content of South Florida Indian frybread: health implications for a pervasive native-American food. J Am Diet Assoc. (2001) 101:582–5. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00146-8
76. USDA . Indigenous food sovereignty initiative (2024). Available at: https://www.usda.gov/tribalrelations/usda-programs-and-services/usda-indigenous-food-sovereignty-initiative, accessed February 17, 2024
77. Federally-Recognized Tribes Extension Program . Available at: https://www.nifa.usda.gov/grants/programs/nifa-tribal-programs/federally-recognized-tribes-extension-program. accessed February 17. (2024).
78. Native American Food Sovereignty Alliance . Available at: https://nativefoodalliance.org/our-programs-2/. accessed February 17 (2024).
79. Indigenous Food Wellness Circle . Available at: https://nativecoalition.unl.edu/indigenous-food-wellness-circle. accessed February 17 (2024).
80. First Nations Development Institute . Available at: https://www.firstnations.org/projects/native-farm-to-school/. accessed February 17 (2024).
81. Diemer-Eaton, Jessica . (2014). Keeping foods for later use. Retrieved from http://woodlandindianedu.com/dryingfoods.html. accessed February 17, 2024
82. North American Traditional Indigenous Food Systems . Available at: https://natifs.org/blog/. accessed February 17 (2024).
83. United Tribes Technical College Available at: https://uttc.edu/academics/programs-degrees/sustainable-ag-food-systems/. accessed February 17 (2024).
84. University of Wisconsin-Madison Division of Extension Native Nations Team . Available at: https://blogs.extension.wisc.edu/natf/. accessed February 17 (2024).
85. College of Menominee Nation . Available at: https://www.menominee.edu/academic-catalog. accessed February 17 (2024).
Keywords: indigenous food sovereignty, nutrition security, health equity, food processing, food safety, food quality
Citation: Heaney D, Padilla-Zakour OI and Chen C (2024) Processing and preservation technologies to enhance indigenous food sovereignty, nutrition security and health equity in North America. Front. Nutr. 11:1395962. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1395962
Edited by:
Yonathan Asikin, University of the Ryukyus, JapanReviewed by:
Wenqiang Guan, Tianjin University of Commerce, ChinaCopyright © 2024 Heaney, Padilla-Zakour and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Chang Chen, cc2774@cornell.edu; Olga I. Padilla-Zakour, oip1@cornell.edu