Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr., 25 May 2023
Sec. Nutrition and Food Science Technology
This article is part of the Research Topic Valorization of Food and Agro-Industrial Waste: Novel Approaches and Their Applications View all 7 articles

Enhancement of agri-food by-products: green extractions of bioactive molecules with fungicidal action against mycotoxigenic fungi and their mycotoxins

  • 1Dipartimento delle Produzioni Vegetali Sostenibili (DIPROVES), Facoltà di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy
  • 2Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, della Nutrizione e degli Alimenti (DIANA), Facoltà di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy
  • 3Centro Ricerche Produzioni Animali Soc. Cons. p.A, Reggio Emilia, Italy
  • 4Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Biotecnologie, Università Degli Studi Di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

Introduction: Today, alternative strategies based on the use of bioactive compounds have been proposed to reduce mycotoxin contamination and limit the use of chemical fungicides.

Methods: In the present work, several by-products collected from the agri-food chain (i.e., red and white grape marc, red grapevine leaves, grape seeds and stalks, pear, apple, green beans, tomato, and spent hops) were subjected to green extraction protocols (i.e., steam distillation, Ultrasound-Assisted, and Naviglio® extraction) to obtain extracts rich in polyphenols and terpenes. Each extract was assessed in vitro for its ability to inhibit the development of the main mycotoxigenic species and related mycotoxins.

Results and Discussion: Aspergillus flavus and A. carbonarius were significantly reduced by pear (from −45 to −47%) and grape marc (from −21 to −51%) extracts, while F. graminearum was shown to be highly influenced by grape stalk, pear, and grape marc extracts (−24% on average). On the contrary, F. verticillioides was inhibited only by pear (−18%) and to a very low and negligible extent by apple (−1%) and green beans (−3%). Regarding the reduction of mycotoxins, the extracts were able to inhibit OTA from 2 to 57%, AFB1 from 5 to 75%, and DON from 14 to 72%. The highest percentages of reduction were obtained against FBs (from 11 to 94%), ZEN (from 17 to 100%), and Alternaria toxins (from 7 to 96%). In conclusion, this work provided promising results for the production of bioactive extracts obtained from agri-food by-products, which could be exploited as potential biofungicides against the development of mycotoxigenic fungi and related mycotoxins.

1. Introduction

The presence of mycotoxins in food commodities is a concrete risk worldwide, with important potential impacts on human and animal health; therefore, their presence in agricultural products is the subject of extensive research across the globe. Cereals, dried fruits, and spices may be exposed to contamination by several mycotoxigenic fungal species and related mycotoxins (15). Moreover, in a climate change scenario where high temperatures and extreme events such as floods or droughts are reached, the development of mycotoxigenic fungi could find suitable environmental conditions for their easy growth. The European Union (EU) has established maximum levels for the major mycotoxins (6, 7). Recently, the European Commission also published maximum levels for Claviceps ergot and a recommendation for Alternaria toxins in food products, underscoring the increasing concern about the possible effects of these mycotoxins on human health (8, 9).

Preventive methods, such as good agricultural practices and the use of appropriate chemical products, are considered the best choices to reduce mycotoxin contamination. However, the increasing interest of consumers in the adverse health effects presumably produced by pesticides has led to a growing demand for natural products, as their use is seen as an improvement in food quality and consumer safety. Due to the increasing need to reduce the use of chemical pesticides in agriculture, also according to the guidelines of the EU Green Deal, and to achieve both the environmental emergency and the consumer demand for safer agro-food products, several bioactive compounds showed to be promising alternatives as inhibitors of antifungal activity and mycotoxin production.

In in vitro studies, phenolic compounds, which are naturally found in plants, herbs, fruits, and other vegetables, showed antifungal activity and could limit mycotoxin production (1012). Polyphenols were able to inhibit trichothecene-producing Fusarium (13), isoflavones showed weak inhibitory activity against Fusarium graminearum (14), and several essential oils were efficient in mitigating mycotoxigenic Aspergillus and Penicillium species (15, 16). In general, naturally occurring phenolic compounds and terpenes seem to be really effective as anti-mycotoxin agents. Food waste represents a reservoir of these bioactive compounds, and their valorization through appropriate biorefinery approaches could play a crucial role in sustainable and zero-waste global development. In fact, today, the residual biomass discarded by the whole food chain amounts to 1,300 Mtons/year, with a significant impact on the ecosystem. For this reason, the circular economy is now being explored as a new economic system that allows the reuse and valorization of waste and by-products as a resource to manufacture new materials and products. In this perspective, food waste extracts could be a potential source of bioactive polyphenols that can be exploited for many different purposes (e.g., food additives, preservatives, coloring agents, and nutraceuticals) (17). Besides their common application as antioxidants and antimicrobials, they could also be used as biofungicides and inhibit mycotoxin production in different raw commodities (18). The by-products considered come from three different agri-food supply chains (wine, canning, and brewing) in the Emilia Romagna region, where the two collaborating universities for this study are located. The most abundant by-products of the wine and canning supply chains were considered: marc, stalks, grape seeds, and leaves from the wine supply chain; and pear, apple, green bean, and tomato processing waste from the canning supply chain. In the case of the brewing chain, the spent hops were considered for their essential oil content and anti-fungal activity.

Many different methodologies can be used for bioactive compounds, ranging from conventional ones such as acid and alkaline hydrolysis, solvent extraction, and Soxhlet extraction to more sustainable and new techniques that are more cost-effective and highly efficient (19). The extraction techniques used for this study (Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction, Naviglio®, and steam distillation) were chosen based on secondary metabolites with possible antifungal activity against the microorganisms able to be obtained and also for their low environmental impact. The first two, carried out with hydroalcoholic solvents, were necessary for the extraction of polar molecules, while steam distillation, the method of choice for obtaining essential oils (also listed in the Official European Pharmacopoeia for numerous drugs), was used to obtain hop essential oil.

Using these extraction processes, different agri-food wastes have been exploited for their biological, biostatic, and biocidal activities and have been considered for their possible use as alternatives to protect plants from contamination by fungi and mycotoxins, limiting the use of chemical fungicides.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Chemicals and raw materials

All of the solvents, standards, salts, acids, and bases were of analytical grade and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich-Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) or Carlo Erba (Milan, Italy). Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), ochratoxin (OTA), fumonisins B1 and B2 (FB1, FB2), deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEN), alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), and tenuazonic acid (TEA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The by-products selected for this study were: red and white grape marc (RG and WG, respectively); red grapevine leaves (RGL); grape seeds (VIN) and stalks (GS); pear (PE), apple (AP); green beans (GB); tomato (TO); and spent hops (HW).

2.2. Extractions from food waste

2.2.1. Ultrasound-assisted extraction

Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) was performed in an ultrasonic bath (Ultrasonik 104X, Ney Dental International, MEDWOW, Cyprus) at a working frequency of 48 kHz. An aliquot of 50 g of each sample was extracted with 650 ml of a 50% ethanolic solution for 80 min at room temperature (solvent/solid ratio of 13 ml/g of dried matrix). Each aliquot was subjected to a triple extraction, each time with fresh solvent, to increase the yield of the procedure. The extracts were then filtered and lyophilized. Each extraction was performed in triplicate.

2.2.2. Naviglio® extraction (NAV)

The Naviglio® extractor (Atlas Filtri, Italy) was used to extract solids using a pressurized solvent extraction method (20). Briefly, 30 g of each sample was placed in a bag with a 60 μm filtering membrane and transferred to the chamber of the Naviglio extractor; 400 ml of a 50% ethanolic solution was added. The extraction process consisted of 10 cycles, each divided into two phases, one static, and one dynamic: the former was set for 5 min, while the dynamic phase was set for 3 min, for a total extraction time of 80 min. The extracts were then filtered and lyophilized. Each extraction was performed in triplicate.

2.2.3. Steam distillation of spent hops

An aliquot of 300 g of the spent hops was used to obtain essential oils by 3 h steam distillation (DIS) with a Clevenger apparatus according to the methods of the European Pharmacopoeia. The extract yield was determined on a volume-to-wet-weight basis, and the samples, dehydrated, were stored in glass vials with Teflon sealed caps at −18 ± 0.5°C in the absence of light until analysis.

2.3. Extract characterization

2.3.1. Determination of total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and total proanthocyanidin content

The determination of total polyphenolic, flavonoid, and proanthocyanidin content was performed using a Thermo Spectronic Helios-γ spectrophotometer (Gebraucht, Germany) according to the method described by Greco et al. (21). The total phenolic content (TPC) results are expressed as the g equivalent of gallic acid/100 g of dried extract, total flavonoid content (TFC) as the g equivalent of hyperoside/100 g of dried extract, and total proanthocyanidin content (TPrC) as the g equivalent of cyanidin chloride/100 g of dried extract. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

2.3.2. RP-HPLC-DAD analyses

RP-HPLC analyses were performed with a JASCO modular HPLC system (Tokyo, Japan, model PU 2089) coupled to a diode array apparatus (MD 2010 Plus). The HPLC was equipped with an injection valve with a 20 μl sampling loop and an Eclipse-PLUS-C18 column (25 mm × 0.46 cm, 5 μm; Phenomenex, Bologna, Italy) at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The identification and quantification of different polyphenols in the extracts of agri-food waste were performed following the experimental conditions also used by Tacchini et al. (caftaric acid and flavonoids) (22), Bernardi et al. (anthocyanins) (23), and Kammerer et al. (gallic acid and catechins) (24). The different peaks were identified by comparing their UV spectra and retention times with those of pure standards. Dedicated JASCO software (ChromNAV version 2.02.01) was used to calculate peak areas by integration. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

2.3.3. GC–MS and GC-FID analyses

The samples obtained from steam distillation were diluted, and 1 μl of the solution was injected for gas chromatography (GC). GC analysis was performed on a Varian GC3800 gas chromatograph equipped with a Varian MS-4000 mass spectrometer using electron impact (EI) and hooked to the NIST library, and a ThermoQuest GC-Trace (ThermoQuest Italia, Rodano, Italy) coupled to a flame ion detector. The operating conditions are the same as those reported by Tacchini et al. (25). Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

2.4. Preparation of fungal strains

Representative mycotoxigenic fungal strains were obtained from official fungal collections, as reported in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Mycotoxigenic fungal strains obtained from official collections and used in the experiments.

Fungal strains were centrally transferred on Petri dishes (Ø 9 cm) containing potato dextrose agar (PDA, Biolife, Milan, Italy) and incubated at 25°C for 7 days (12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod). After the incubation period, the developed fungal colonies were used as a source for further inoculations.

2.5. Extract evaluation – in vitro test

All the extracts were tested for their ability to reduce mycotoxigenic fungal growth and mycotoxin production at a concentration of 1,000 mg/L. On Petri dishes (Ø 9 cm) containing potato dextrose agar (PDA, Biolife, Milan, Italy), 1 mL of the extract solution was distributed with a sterile spreader. Fungal inoculation was performed by cutting agar discs (Ø 2 mm) using a sterile cork borer from the edge of the fungal colony prepared as previously described and putting them at the center of the dish. Petri dishes centrally inoculated with fungi but without the addition of extracts were considered untreated. Inoculation was performed for the fungal species listed in Table 1, and the experiment was performed in triplicate.

Petri dishes were incubated at 25°C for 14 days. At the end of the incubation period, fungal growth and mycotoxin production were determined.

2.5.1. Measurement of fungal growth

The diameter of the fungal colonies was measured along two perpendicular diagonals crossing the inoculum point. The percentage reduction in fungal growth in the presence of the extracts was calculated by comparing the fungal growth diameters obtained in untreated dishes with the fungal growth diameters obtained in the presence of each extract (26).

2.5.2. Mycotoxin production

The entire contents of each Petri dish were homogenized and extracted with 40 mL of CH3CN using a rotary shaker for 45 min. After centrifugation and dilution (1 + 9 v/v) of the extract, mycotoxins were quantified using instrumental methods previously developed and published in our laboratory (2731).

2.6. Data analyses

Data were transformed prior to statistical analysis; specifically, data on fungal growth reduction were arcsine transformed, while data on mycotoxin production (values +1) were logarithmically transformed (32).

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was calculated using the generalized linear model (GLM) procedure of the statistical IBM SPSS Statistics 27 package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States), while significant differences were highlighted using the Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05) for mean separation.

Also for mycotoxins, the percentage reduction of the fungal ability to produce its own mycotoxin was calculated by comparing the mycotoxin production in untreated dishes with the mycotoxin production obtained in the presence of each extract.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of the extracts

A total of 14 different extracts were obtained from 10 different food by-products using the different high-tech methodologies described previously. Extracts obtained using Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction (UAE) and pressurized liquid extraction with Naviglio® technology (NAV) were primarily analyzed for the content of polyphenolic compounds (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Yield and total phenolic compounds (TPC), flavonoids (TFC), and proanthocyanidins (TPrC) content in agri-food extracts.

The extraction methods used for the production of extracts allowed yields ranging from 9.32% in VIN to 37.92% in GB. Red grape marc, white grape marc, and grapevine leaves were extracted using both NAV and UAE techniques, with UAE providing the highest extract yields. These extracts were also subjected to chemical analysis in order to quantify the content of total phenols, flavonoids, and proanthocyanidins. Total phenolic compounds ranged from 17.56 g gallic acid equivalent/100 g dried extract in TO to 514.26 g gallic acid equivalent/100 g dried extract in VIN. As previously reported, for those samples that were subjected to both UAE and NAV extraction techniques, UAE allowed the recovery of the highest amount of phenolic compounds. Total flavonoids were determined in concentrations ranging from 3.88 g of hyperoside/100 g dried extract in AP to 126.41 g of hyperoside/100 g dried extract in RGL NAV; the highest amount of total proanthocyanidins was detected in VIN extract (92.17 g cyanidin chloride/100 g dried extract), while the lowest was TO (0.58 g cyanidin chloride /100 g dried extract). Comparing these results, it can be observed that, while UAE gave a higher extraction yield and a higher quantity of total phenolic content than NAV, the quantification of total flavonoids shows the opposite trend, explaining a possible selectivity of this technique towards the latter molecular category. The first eight extracts in Table 2 came from waste from the wine supply chain and showed a higher amount of total phenols compared to the other by-products selected in the current study. In particular, among all the extracts, grape seed UAE was characterized by the highest content of total phenols (514.26 g gallic acid equivalent /100 g dry extract), composed of 18% proanthocyanidins and 12% flavonoids. This matrix, although of high commercial value, showed the lowest extractive yield compared to the other agri-food extracts obtained. Considering the quantification of total flavonoids, RGL extracted using the NAV technique was the richest waste matrix among those analyzed, showing twice the flavonoid content of grape seeds. The flavonoid fraction of this matrix was then studied in detail, and individual flavonoids were identified and quantified. Table 3 shows the results of the flavonoid quantification of the leaf extract.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Main flavonoid content in grapevine leaf extracts (RGL) obtained by both ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and Naviglio extraction (NAV).

In this case, too, the NAV technique gave the best quantitative results, highlighting the main flavonoids as quercetin and kaempferol derivates.

Another molecular category of interest from the point of view of reducing fungal growth is anthocyanins (33); a preliminary quantification was carried out in the red pomace extracts (Table 4).

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Main anthocyanins in grape pomace extract (RG) obtained by both ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and Naviglio extraction (NAV).

NAV and UAE did not significantly influence the concentration of anthocyanins detected in the RG extracts, and oenin was the most abundant in both samples.

Moreover, chlorogenic acid, known for its antifungal action (34), was determined in AP and PE extracts since it is one of the main secondary metabolites identified in these vegetables. Pear processing residues obtained with UAE showed a chlorogenic acid content of 2.54 ± 0.21 mg/g of extract, while apple processing residues obtained with UAE showed 0.70 ± 0.03 mg/g of extract.

Finally, the HW extract (from the IPA mixture after brewing) was obtained by hydro-distillation and characterized for its terpene content by GC–MS and GC-FID analysis (Table 5).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. GC-MS-FID chemical characterization of spent hop distillation extract.

The extraction yield of the exhausted hop (Hop-EO) after IPA brewing was 0.10%, and the most abundant terpenes were: myrcene (29.1%), α-caryophyllene (29.1%), β-caryophyllene (13.9%), cadinene (5.0%), and humulene epoxide (2.5%).

3.2. Inhibition of mycotoxigenic fungal growth

The mycotoxigenic fungi tested were shown to be differentially affected by the extracts. In particular, A. flavus and A. alternata were the fungi inhibited by the highest (n = 9) and the lowest (n = 1) number of extracts, respectively (Table 6). In general, the growth of the Aspergillus species considered in this study (A. flavus and A. carbonarius) was more affected by PE (reductions from 45 to 47%) and RG-WG (reductions from 21 to 51%) extracts, but also TO (−24%) and GS (reductions from 27 to 33%) extracts, which proved to be good inhibitors for these fungi’s development. For Aspergillus species, differences were found for AP and GB extracts; in fact, in both cases, A. carbonarius was more affected by their presence (reduction of 23 and 28%, respectively) (Figure 1) when compared with A. flavus (reduction of 8 and 10%, respectively) (Figure 2).

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Average percentage reduction or increase in fungal growth and associated mycotoxins following treatment with agri-food extracts.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Mean development (mm) and ochratoxin A production (OTA, ng) of A. carbonarius grown on Petri dishes (Ø 90 mm) with potato dextrose agar and 1 ml of different extracts obtained from agricultural production waste at a concentration of 1,000 mg/L after 14 days of incubation at 25°C. Different letters mean significant differences according to Tukey’s test; blue letters refer to significant differences between the theses related to fungal growth, while orange letters refer to significant differences between the theses related to mycotoxin production.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Mean development (mm) and aflatoxin B1 production (AFB1, ng) of A. flavus grown on Petri dishes (Ø 90 mm) with potato dextrose agar and 1 ml of different extracts obtained from agricultural production waste at a concentration of 1,000 mg/L after 14 days of incubation at 25°C. Different letters mean significant differences according to Tukey’s test; blue letters refer to significant differences between the theses related to fungal growth, while orange letters refer to significant differences between the theses related to mycotoxin production.

Among the Fusarium species considered in this study, more differences in fungal susceptibility were found. While F. graminearum was shown to be highly affected in its development by several extracts (GS, PE, and RG-WG) (Figure 3), F. verticillioides was only inhibited by PE (−18%) and to a very low and negligible extent by AP (−1%) and GB (−3%) (Figure 4).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Mean development (mm) and deoxynivalenol production (DON, ng) of F. graminearum grown on Petri dishes (Ø 90 mm) with potato dextrose agar and 1 ml of different extracts obtained from agricultural production waste at a concentration of 1,000 mg/L after 14 days of incubation at 25°C. Different letters mean significant differences according to Tukey’s test; blue letters refer to significant differences between the theses related to fungal growth, while orange letters refer to significant differences between the theses related to mycotoxin production.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Mean development (mm) and deoxynivalenol production (ZEN, ng) of F. graminearum grown on Petri dishes (Ø 90 mm) with potato dextrose agar and 1 ml of different extracts obtained from agricultural production waste at a concentration of 1,000 mg/L after 14 days of incubation at 25°C. Different letters mean significant differences according to Tukey’s test; blue letters refer to significant differences between the theses related to fungal growth, while orange letters refer to significant differences between the theses related to mycotoxin production.

Alternaria alternata was less affected by the presence of extracts, resulting in a slight reduction only with GB (−5.8%) (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Mean development (mm) and fumonisin production (FB1 + FB2, ng) of F. verticillioides grown on Petri dishes (Ø 90 mm) with potato dextrose agar and 1 ml of different extracts obtained from agricultural production waste at a concentration of 1,000 mg/L after 14 days of incubation at 25°C. Different letters mean significant differences according to Tukey’s test; blue letters refer to significant differences between the theses related to fungal growth, while orange letters refer to significant differences between the theses related to mycotoxin production.

Interestingly, some extracts were effective against more fungi. In particular, PE extract was one of the most effective against A. flavus, A. carbonarius, F. verticillioides, and F. graminearum, causing significantly lower development in the considered fungi (p ≤ 0.01) (Figures 14). Marcs from both red and white grapes can significantly reduce fungal development in all fungi considered, with the sole exception of A. alternata and F. verticillioides (p ≤ 0.01) (Figures 13).

3.3. Inhibition of mycotoxin production

The production of mycotoxins was more affected than fungal growth. The reductions obtained from the extracts varied from 2.3 to 70.7% for OTA, from 5 to 74.8% for AFB1, from 8.5 to 79.7% for DON, from 10.8 to 94% for FBs, from 63 to 100% for ZEN, and from 6.6 to 95.9% for Alternaria toxins (Table 6).

It is noteworthy that ZEN and DON produced by F. graminearum often showed opposite behaviors when treated with the same extracts. In particular, with RG-WG obtained from NAV, regardless of the grape color, ZEN was completely inhibited, while DON was increased more than 100 times. The same happened with RG obtained from UAE and with PE extracts.

Taking into consideration only the significant differences in mycotoxin production highlighted by ANOVA, species-dependent results were obtained.

Regarding OTA, although good reductions were obtained with several extracts (GS, PE, RG, and RGL UAE), only the essential oil of spent hops was shown to induce a significant reduction in mycotoxin production (p ≤ 0.05); on the contrary, AP and VIN induced an increase in OTA production (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 1).

More extracts were able to reduce the production of AFB1 by A. flavus. In particular, PE extract, RGL UAE extract, and hop essential oil were the most effective in significantly reducing mycotoxin production (p ≤ 0.01), obtaining a decrease ranging from 57.7 to 74.8%. However, significant reductions were also obtained by GS, AP, and WG independently of the extraction method (p ≤ 0.01), although to a lesser extent (Figure 2).

Fusarium species showed completely different behavior. Considering DON produced by F. graminearum, a significant reduction in mycotoxin production was obtained only by WG UAE (−72%) (p ≤ 0.05), but good reductions were also obtained by TO and AP extracts, with 60 and 30% less production, respectively, although not significant from a statistical point of view (Figure 3).

Regarding ZEN, the other mycotoxin produced by F. graminearum, all the RG-WG and PE extracts were the most effective in its reduction (−100%) (p ≤ 0.01); satisfactory results were also obtained using HW-UAE (−97%) (Figure 4).

For FB, more extracts were able to significantly reduce the mycotoxins. The most effective were WG and DON, but in this case, they were extracted by NAV and PE extracts with reductions higher than 80% (p ≤ 0.01) (Figure 5). The production of FBs by F. verticillioides was, however, significantly reduced by approximately 70% when GS and WG were extracted by UAE (p ≤ 0.01) (Figure 5).

For Alternaria toxins, it is difficult to highlight some extracts that are able to contrast all the mycotoxins considered in the same way. In many cases, we observed a significant reduction for some Alternaria toxins and, at the same time, a high production for others among those considered. Taking into account TeA, often the most abundant in cereals, the most significant reductions were obtained with HW- extracted UAE (−42.8%) and with VIN extract (−50.3%) (p ≤ 0.01) (Figure 6). For the other mycotoxins considered, the best results were obtained instead by WG, both NAV, and UAE, for AOH (about −82%) (p ≤ 0.01) and by GB (−94.4%) and WG-NAV (−95.9%) for AME (p ≤ 0.01) (Figure 7). Although not statistically significant for all Alternaria toxins considered, GB, VIN, RGL-UAE, and HW-UAE extracts were able to reduce all three toxins to different extents (Figure 7).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Mean development (mm) and tenuazoic acid production (TeA, ng) of A. alternata grown on Petri dishes (Ø 90 mm) with potato dextrose agar and 1 ml of different extracts obtained from agricultural production waste at a concentration of 1,000 mg/L after 14 days of incubation at 25°C. Different letters mean significant differences according to Tukey’s test; blue letters refer to significant differences between the theses related to fungal growth, while orange letters refer to significant differences between the theses related to mycotoxin production.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Mean production of alternariol (AOH, ng) and alternariol monoether (AME, ng) of A. alternata grown on Petri dishes (Ø 90 mm) with potato dextrose agar and 1 ml of different extracts obtained from agricultural production waste at a concentration of 1,000 mg/L after 14 days of incubation at 25°C.

4. Discussion

The different results obtained by the different agri-food waste extracts tested in this work were probably due to their varying chemical compositions. Several published studies reported the antifungal activities of pure chemical compounds; some of them also showed interesting results against mycotoxigenic fungi. Compounds belonging to the terpene and benzaldehyde classes showed reducing activities against aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus species: o-vanillin damaged the mitochondria of A. flavus (35, 36), and some essential oils (cinnamaldehyde, thymol, citral, and carvacrol) inhibited A. flavus growth and AFB1 production (37). In addition, several organic acids (such as benzoic acid, butyric acid, sorbic acid, hop α- and β-acids, and phenolic acids), flavonoids, and naphthoquinones have also been shown to reduce A. flavus growth and AFB1 production (11, 3841).

In our study, a systemic approach was used to evaluate the potential inhibitory effects of 14 different agri-food waste extracts against multiple mycotoxigenic fungi and related mycotoxins. In particular, the agri-food waste extracts that showed the highest reductions against Aspergillus and aflatoxins were hop essential oil, rich in terpenes, red grape leaves, and pear extract, rich in flavonoids and phenolic acids.

Regarding toxigenic Fusarium species, isoflavonoids, and phenolic compounds showed activities against F. graminearum (14) and trichothecene (13). Green bean extract, containing isoflavonoids such as genistein and daidzein, was able to significantly reduce DON, FBs, and ZEA; pear, white, and red grape extracts, rich in phenolic compounds, reduced FBs production.

Finally, the reduction of OTA by RG-NAV extract can be supported by the inhibition of flavonoids on A. carbonarius and OTA reported by Ricelli et al. (42).

It is always very important to consider the different effects that the use of extracts may have on fungal growth and mycotoxin production, which are not always correlated. It is possible to observe how the same extract can reduce fungal development but may not be effective on mycotoxins, and vice versa. This is quite normal for mycotoxigenic fungi because of their specific nature. In fact, it is well known that stress conditions, such as those caused by restrictions in development due to fungicides, can induce a higher production of mycotoxins by the same fungus (4345), even if with scarce growth. On the other hand, mycotoxigenic fungi developing in environments without stress conditions can grow very much and quickly without the necessity to produce mycotoxins (46, 47). Considering extracts, they can have a possible effect on fungal behavior, since they are composed of substances naturally present in the plant substrates attacked by fungi and that can be used, in some cases, as nutritional compounds by some species. For this reason, if extracts are to be used as possible biofungicides, it is important to study their species-specific effects, since for some fungal species they can boost their development (but at the same time create less stress and thus lower mycotoxin content), and for other fungal species the same extract may limit their growth (but at the same time increase mycotoxin content). Our study confirms the findings reported in previous works that evaluated the antifungal properties of some agri-food waste. Spent coffee grounds showed detoxification for AFBs and OTA (11); lemon peel extract, rich in flavonoids, reduced aflatoxin toxicity in rats (48); olive mill wastewater, produced during olive oil extraction, was shown to suppress AFB1 produced by A. flavus, although no inhibition against fungi was determined (49); apple pomace extracts, rich in phloridzin and quercetin derivatives, showed inhibitory properties against F. oxysporum and N. fischeri (50). Moreover, application as nano-emulsion or micro-capsulation improved the efficacy of food waste extracts; Faouk et al. (51) reported that nano-emulsion of ginger essential oil through an edible coating increased its bioactivity, achieving higher inhibition of A. flavus and related AFB production. Finally, Badr et al. (52) proposed the use of encapsulated grape by-products (stems and leaves) as bio-preservatives in foods; their utilization provided relevant OTA reduction.

However, fewer encouraging results were obtained with some extracts that promoted the growth and production of fungi and related mycotoxins. The PE and WG-NAV extracts, even if they inhibited the growth of F. graminearum and the production of ZEN, promoted the production of DON (on average 50% with respect to the control test). In addition, OTA was promoted by AP and VIN extracts, with percentages that exceeded 100%.

5. Conclusion

Large amounts of waste and by-products are generated along the whole food chain, which, before being discarded, could be significantly valorized as they represent a source of bioactive compounds. In the present work, high-tech extraction processes with high sustainability were applied to a wide range of organic by-products produced in the agro-food sector in order to obtain extracts rich in polyphenols and terpenes. These extracts demonstrated to be a valuable tool for the in vitro inhibition of some of the most important mycotoxigenic fungi and related mycotoxins. These extracts could be applied in the field or during food storage to reduce the mycotoxin contamination of raw materials to regulatory limits. This could significantly reduce the use of chemical pesticides, which are largely used today, with cascading positive effects on the environment, biodiversity, and human health.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

PG and TB designed and supervised the research. PG, TB, MT, and GL wrote the manuscript. TB, MS, GS, and AG assisted in drafting and revising the manuscript. PG, GB, TB, GL, and MT conducted the trials and analyzed the samples. All authors wrote the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the 2014–2020 Emilia-Romagna Rural Development Program, Operation Type 16.1.01, Operational Groups of the European Innovation Partnership “Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability,” Focus Area 3A, Innovation Plan “MIlk_COntrollo.”

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Giorni, P, Bertuzzi, T, and Battilani, P. Impact of fungi co-occurrence on mycotoxin contamination in maize during the growing season. Front Microbiol. (2019) 10:1265. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Zhao, L, Zhang, L, Xu, Z, Liu, X, Chen, L, Dai, J, et al. Occurrence of aflatoxin B1, deoxynivalenol and zearalenone in feeds in China during 2018-2020. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. (2021) 12:74. doi: 10.1186/s40104-021-00603-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Xu, W, Han, X, and Li, F. Co-occurrence of multi-mycotoxins in wheat grains harvested in Anhui province, China. Food Control. (2019) 96:180–5. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.09.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kim, DH, Hong, SY, Kang, JW, Cho, SM, Lee, KR, An, TK, et al. Simultaneous determination of multi-mycotoxins in cereal grains collected from South Korea by LC/MS/MS. Toxins. (2017) 9:106. doi: 10.3390/toxins9030106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Soares Mateus, AR, Barros, S, Pena, A, and Sanches Silva, A. Mycotoxins in pistachios (Pistacia vera L.): methods for determination, occurrence, decontamination. Toxins. (2021) 13. doi: 10.3390/toxins13100682

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. EU . Commission regulation (EC) no 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 and its updates setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union. (2006) L364:5–24.

Google Scholar

7. EU . Commission regulation (EC) no 1370/2022 of 5 august 2022 setting maximum levels for ochratoxin a in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union. (2022) L206:11–4.

Google Scholar

8. EU . Commission regulation (EC) no 1399/2021 of 24 august setting maximum levels for Claviceps alkaloids in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union. (2021) L301:1–5.

Google Scholar

9. EU . Commission recommendation (EC) no 553/2022 of 5 April 2022 related to Alternaria toxins in certain foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union. (2022) L107:90–2.

Google Scholar

10. Bakan, B, Bily, AC, Melcion, D, Cahagnier, B, Regnault-Roger, C, Philogène, BJR, et al. Possible role of plant Phenolics in the production of Trichothecenes by Fusarium graminearum strains on different fractions of maize kernels. J Agr Food Chem. (2003) 51:2826–31. doi: 10.1021/jf020957g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Badr, AN, El-Attar, MM, Ali, HS, Elkhadragy, MF, Yehia, HM, and Farouk, A. Spent coffee grounds valorization as bioactive phenolic source acquired antifungal, anti-mycotoxigenic and anti-cytotoxic activities. Toxins. (2022) 14. doi: 10.3390/toxins14020109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Martínez-Alonso, C, Taroncher, M, Castaldo, L, Izzo, L, Rodríguez-Carrasco, Y, Ritieni, A, et al. Effect of phenolic extract from red beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on T-2 toxin-induced cytotoxicity in HepG2 cells. Foods. (2022) 11:1033. doi: 10.3390/foods11071033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Chtioui, W, Balmas, V, Delogu, G, Migheli, Q, and Oufensou, S. Bioprospecting phenols as inhibitors of Trichothecene-producing Fusarium: sustainable approaches to the management of wheat pathogens. Toxins. (2022) 14. doi: 10.3390/toxins14020072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Li, Y, Li, G, Yu, H, Jiao, X, and Gao, K. Antifungal activities of isoflavonoids from Uromyces striatus infected alfalfa. Chem Biochem. (2018) 15:e1800407. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201800407

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Camiletti, BX, Asensio, CM, Pecci, MPG, and Lucini, EI. Natural control of corn postharvest Fungi Aspergillus flavus and Penicillium spp. using essential oils from plants grown in Argentina. J Food Sci. (2014) 79:M2499–506. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12700

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Valková, V, Dúranová, H, Galovicová, L, Vukovic, NL, Vukic, M, and Kacániová, M. In vitro antimicrobial activity of lavender, mint, and rosemary essential oils and the effect of their Vapours on growth of Penicillium spp. in a bread model system. Molecules. (2001) 26. doi: 10.3390/molecules26133859

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. More, PR, Jambrak, AR, and Arya, SS. Green, environment-friendly and sustainable techniques for extraction of food bioactive compounds and waste valorization. Trends Food Sci Tech. (2022) 128:296–315. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.08.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Oleszek, M, Kowalska, I, Bertuzzi, T, and Oleszek, W. Phytochemicals derived from agricultural residues and their valuable properties and applications. Molecules. (2023) 28. doi: 10.3390/molecules28010342

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Fărcaș, AC, Socaci, SA, Nemeș, SA, Salanță, LC, Chiș, MS, Pop, CR, et al. Cereal waste valorization through conventional and current extraction techniques – An up-to-date overview. Foods. (2022) 11:2454. doi: 10.3390/foods11162454

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Naviglio, D . Principle and presentation of an innovative solid-liquid extraction technology: Extractor Naviglio®. Anal Lett. (2003) 36:1647–1659. doi: 10.1081/AL-120021555

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Greco, G, Turrini, E, Tacchini, M, Maresca, I, and Fimognari, C. The alcoholic bark extract of Terminalia arjuna exhibits cytotoxic and cytostatic activity on Jurkat leukemia cells. VAT. (2021) 1:56–66. doi: 10.2174/2666121701999200601170928

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Tacchini, M, Burlini, I, Maresca, I, Grandini, A, Bernardi, T, Guerrini, A, et al. Polyphenols from Vitis vinifera Lambrusco by-products (leaves from pruning): extraction parameters evaluation through Design of Experiment. Nat Prod Commun. (2019) 14:1934578X1986290. doi: 10.1177/1934578X19862906

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Bernardi, T, Bortolini, O, Massi, A, Sacchetti, G, Tacchini, M, and De Risi, C. Exploring the synergy between HPTLC and HPLC-DAD for the investigation of wine-making by-products. Molecules. (2019) 24:3416. doi: 10.3390/molecules24193416

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kammerer, D, Claus, A, Carle, R, and Schieber, A. Polyphenol screening of pomace from red and white grape varieties (Vitis vinifera L.) by HPLC-DAD-MS/MS. J Agric Food Chem. (2004) 52:4360–7. doi: 10.1021/jf049613b

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Tacchini, M, Echeverria Guevara, MP, Grandini, A, Maresca, I, Radice, M, Angiolella, L, et al. Ocimum campechianum mill. From Amazonian Ecuador: chemical composition and biological activities of extracts and their Main constituents (eugenol and Rosmarinic acid). Molecules. (2020) 26. doi: 10.3390/molecules26010084

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Bertuzzi, T, Leni, G, Bulla, G, and Giorni, P. Reduction of mycotoxigenic fungi growth and their mycotoxin production by Bacillus subtilis QST 713. Toxins. (2022) 14. doi: 10.3390/toxins14110797

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Bertuzzi, T, Rastelli, S, Mulazzi, A, and Pietri, A. Evaluation and improvement of extraction methods for the analysis of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1 and G2 from naturally contaminated maize. Food Anal Method. (2012) 5:512–9. doi: 10.1007/s12161-011-9274-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Pietri, A, and Bertuzzi, T. Simple phosphate buffer extraction for the determination of fumonisins in masa, maize and derived products. Food Anal Method. (2012) 5:1088–96. doi: 10.1007/s12161-011-9351-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Bertuzzi, T, Camardo Leggieri, M, Battilani, P, and Pietri, A. Co-occurrence of type a and b trichothecenes and zearalenone in wheat grown in northern Italy over the years 2009–2011. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill. (2014) 7:273–81. doi: 10.1080/19393210.2014.926397

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Pietri, A, Rastelli, S, Mulazzi, A, and Bertuzzi, T. Aflatoxins and ochratoxin a in dried chestnuts and chestnut flour produced in Italy. Food Control. (2012) 25:601–6. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.11.042

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Bertuzzi, T, Rastelli, S, Pietri, A, and Giorni, P. Alternaria toxins in tomato products in northern Italy in the period 2017-2019. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill. (2021) 14:170–6. doi: 10.1080/19393210.2021.1895325

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Clewer, AG, and Scarisbrick, DH. Practical statistics and experimental design for plant and crop science. England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (2001).

Google Scholar

33. Mendoza, L, Cotoras, M, Vivanco, M, Matsuhiro, B, Torres, S, and Aguirre, M. Evaluation of antifungal properties against the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea of anthocyanin rich-extracts obtained from grape pomaces. J Chil Chem Soc. (2013) 58:1725–7. doi: 10.4067/S0717-97072013000200018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Sung, WS, and Lee, DG. Antifungal action of chlorogenic acid against pathogenic Fungi, mediated by membrane disruption. Pure Appl Chem. (2010) 82:219–26. doi: 10.1351/PAC-CON-09-01-08

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Adams, RP . Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. IL (USA): Allured Publishing Corporation, Carol Stream (2007).

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

36. Li, Q, Zhao, Y, Zhu, X, and Xie, Y. Antifungal effect of o-vanillin on mitochondria of aspergillus flavus: ultrastructure and TCA cycle are destroyed. Int J Food Sci Technol. (2022) 57:3142–9. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.15647

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Han, B, Fu, GW, and Wang, JQ. Inhibition of essential oils on growth of Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin B1 production in broth and poultry feed. Toxins. (2022) 14. doi: 10.3390/toxins14100655

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Nionelli, L, Pontonio, E, Gobbetti, M, and Rizzello, CG. Use of hop extract as antifungal ingredient for bread making and selection of autochthonous resistant starters for sourdough fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol. (2018) 266:173–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Pok, PS, García Londoño, VA, Vicente, S, Romero, SM, Pacín, A, Tolaba, M, et al. Evaluation of citrus flavonoids against Aspergillus parasiticus in maize: aflatoxins reduction and ultrastructure alterations. Food Chem. (2020) 318:126414. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126414

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Kim, G, and Lee, SE. Antifungal and antiaflatoxigenic properties of naphthoquinones toward Aspergillus flavus and their mode of inhibitory action on aflatoxin biosynthesis. Food Control. (2021) 119:107506. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.1994.tb00918.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Ponzilacqua, B, Rottinghaus, GE, Landers, BR, and Oliveira, CAF. Effects of medicinal herb and Brazilian traditional plant extracts on in vitro mycotoxin decontamination. Food Control. (2019) 100:24–7. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.01.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Ricelli, A, De Angelis, M, Primitivo, L, Righi, G, Sappino, C, and Antonioletti, R. Role of some food-grade synthesized flavonoids on the control of ochratoxin a in Aspergillus carbonarius. Molecules. (2019) 24:2553. doi: 10.3390/molecules24142553

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Blandino, M, and Reyneri, A. Effect of fungicide and foliar fertilizer application to winter wheat at anthesis on flag leaf senescence, grain yield, flour bread-making quality and DON contamination. Eur J Agron. (2009) 30:275–82. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2008.12.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Feksa, HR, do Couto, HTZ, Garozi, R, de Almeida, JL, Gardiano, CG, and Tessmann, DJ. Pre- and postinfection application of strobilurin-triazole premixes and single fungicides for control of fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol mycotoxin in wheat. Crop Prot. (2019) 117:128–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2018.12.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Formenti, S, Magan, N, Pietri, A, and Battilani, P. In vitro impact on growth, fumonisins and aflatoxins production by Fusarium verticillioides and Aspergillus flavus using anti-fungal compounds and a biological control agent. Phytopatologia Mediterranea. (2012) 51:247–56.

Google Scholar

46. Garcia-Cela, E, Sulyok, M, Verheecke-Vaessen, C, Medina, A, Krska, R, and Magan, N. Interacting environmental stress factors affect metabolomics profiles in stored naturally contaminated maize. Microorganisms. (2022) 10:853. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10050853

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Giorni, P, Magan, N, Pietri, A, and Battilani, P. Growth and aflatoxin production of an Italian strain of Aspergillus flavus: influence of ecological factors and nutritional substrates. World Mycotox J. (2011) 4:425–32. doi: 10.3920/WMJ2011.1300

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Sabry, BA, Badr, AN, Ahmed, KA, Desoukey, MA, and Mohammed, DM. Utilizing lemon peel extract and its nano-emulsion to control aflatoxin toxicity in rats. Food Biosci. (2022) 50:101998. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101998

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Bavaro, SL, D’Antuono, I, Cozzi, G, Haidukowski, M, Cardinali, A, and Logrieco, AF. Inhibition of aflatoxin B1 production by verbascoside and other olive polyphenols. World Mycotoxin J. (2016) 9:545–53. doi: 10.3920/WMJ2015.2018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Oleszek, M, Pecio, Ł, Kozachok, S, Lachowska-Filipiuk, Ż, Oszust, K, and Frąc, M. Phytochemicals of apple pomace as Prospect bio-fungicide agents against mycotoxigenic fungal species – in vitro experiments. Toxins. (2019) 11:361. doi: 10.3390/toxins11060361

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Farouk, A, Abdel-Razek, AG, Gromadzka, K, and Badr, AN. Prevention of aflatoxin occurrence using nuts-edible coating of ginger oil nanoemulsions and investigate the molecular docking strategy. Plan Theory. (2022) 11:2228. doi: 10.3390/plants11172228

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Badr, AN, Gromadzka, K, Shehata, MG, Stuper-Szablewska, K, Drzewiecka, K, Abdel-Razek, AG, et al. Encapsulated bioactive ingredients of grape by-products applicate in fresh-cut fruit and juices diminished the ochratoxins. J Food Process Pres. (2021) 45:e15112. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.15112

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: food waste, plant extract, aflatoxins, fumonisins, deoxynivalenol, ochratoxin A, Alternaria toxins

Citation: Giorni P, Bulla G, Leni G, Soldano M, Tacchini M, Guerrini A, Sacchetti G and Bertuzzi T (2023) Enhancement of agri-food by-products: green extractions of bioactive molecules with fungicidal action against mycotoxigenic fungi and their mycotoxins. Front. Nutr. 10:1196812. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1196812

Received: 30 March 2023; Accepted: 05 May 2023;
Published: 25 May 2023.

Edited by:

Kandi Sridhar, Institut Agro Rennes-Angers, France

Reviewed by:

Otniel Freitas-Silva, Embrapa Food Agroindustry, Brazil
Liana Claudia Salanta, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Johannes Delgado-Ospina, University of San Buenaventura Cali, Colombia
Imma Pagano, University of Salerno, Italy

Copyright © 2023 Giorni, Bulla, Leni, Soldano, Tacchini, Guerrini, Sacchetti and Bertuzzi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Paola Giorni, paola.giorni@unicatt.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.