Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Nutr., 30 March 2023
Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology

Nutrient intakes of pregnant and lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

  • 1Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • 2Human Nutrition Research Center, Indonesian Medical Education, and Research Center (HNRC-IMERI), Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • 3Blackmores Institute, Blackmores Limited, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Introduction: Optimizing dietary intake during pregnancy and lactation is crucial to the growth and development of children and their lifelong health. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe the nutrient intakes of pregnant and lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia, countries that are experiencing rapid nutrition transition in Southeast Asia.

Methods: We screened 2,258 studies published between January 1980 and March 2021. The nutrient intakes of pregnant and lactating women were quantitatively analyzed to calculate the percentage of adequacy using national recommended daily allowances or nutrient intakes (RDA/RNI) and estimated average requirements (EAR) for micronutrients. Standardized mean differences (SMD) between dietary intake and RDA/RNI were determined for selected nutrients.

Results: Fifty-three studies were included and showed that energy and macronutrient intakes among pregnant and lactating women in both countries were below the RDA/RNI. In addition, most studies reported that women failed to meet the EAR for vitamin D (<70% EAR), vitamin E (<50% EAR), and water-soluble vitamins (<80% EAR) except for vitamin C and A among Malaysians. Moreover, calcium, potassium, and iron intakes of pregnant women were <60% EAR in Indonesia and <80% EAR in Malaysia. Phosphorus intake among pregnant women in both countries and sodium intake among Malaysian pregnant women exceeded 100% EAR. Indonesian lactating women had <60% EAR for calcium and potassium intakes, while Malaysian women had more than 100% EAR. For 21 studies reporting overall protein intakes, the standard mean difference (SMD) was −2.26 (95% CI; −2.98, −1.54) below the RDA/RNI for pregnant women and −0.67 SMD (95% CI −15.7, −11.5) for lactating women. When the four studies from Malaysia were analyzed separately, protein intakes of pregnant women were above the RNI. Moreover, low intakes of vitamin D, vitamin C, calcium, and iron, but sufficient intakes in vitamin A, zinc, and phosphorus were observed in pregnant women in both countries.

Conclusion: Dietary intakes of energy, macronutrients, and micronutrients (vitamin D, vitamin E, water-soluble vitamins, calcium, and iron) of pregnant and lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia were below the recommendations. Important heterogeneities were observed even between these two countries for specific essential nutrient intakes. Innovative research and targeted programs to address specific deficiencies should be prioritized.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021252204, identifier: CRD42021252204.

Introduction

The first 1,000 days of life, spanning from conception to the age of two, is pivotal to the offspring's neurodevelopment and lifelong health. Adequate nutrient intake during pregnancy and lactation has been associated with maternal and child health outcomes and will ensure healthy growth and development of the children (1). Poor nutrient intake has been associated with poor maternal and infant outcomes such as preeclampsia, low birth weight, as well as increased risks of maternal and infant mortality (2).

Chronic energy deficiency (CED) commonly occurs among pregnant women and women of reproductive age in developing countries due to multiple factors, such as low socioeconomic status, living in rural areas, family size, inadequate meal frequency, and low dietary quality (3, 4). CED is one of the major contributors to maternal anemia, resulting in a high risk of prematurity and low birth weight (5, 6). In addition, several studies showed that the pregnant women had low energy intake, anemia, and multi-micronutrient deficiencies (e.g., iron, folic acid, vitamin A, vitamin D, vitamin B12, zinc, and iodine) (7, 8). For instance, inadequate intake of iron during pregnancy can cause low birth weight, premature delivery, and impaired cognitive development of infants. Similarly, poor folic acid intake during pregnancy may lead to adverse birth outcomes (e.g., neural tube defects) and an increased risk of rising homocysteine level of the mothers, preeclampsia, and preterm delivery (9, 10).

Meanwhile, micronutrient supplement consumption was not a popular practice among pregnant women in Indonesia and Malaysia, particularly for certain nutrients such as vitamin D (11, 12). Moreover, supplementation programs for pregnant and postpartum women might not be implemented evenly across countries. Overall, the dietary pattern among pregnant women showed a tendency to have a healthier diet than before pregnancy with more consumption of vegetables and protein-rich foods in the early pregnancy (13). Yet, it seemed the adherence did not last until the last trimester. A few studies reported inadequacy of micronutrient intake, particularly iron and zinc, among lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia that may impact inadequacy of these nutrients to breastfed children (14).

Asia is a continent of diverse cultures, represented by various traditional foods and culinary practices. Various traditional dishes are healthy and promote fruits and vegetable consumptions. People residing in developing countries of Southeast Asia region inevitably experienced diet transition that shifted food consumption to more practical and modernized yet heavily processed foods, neglecting traditional foods that are healthy and rich in bio-active compounds (15). Moreover, ultra-processed food (UPF) is also rapidly growing in Indonesia and Malaysia. Although dietary diversity in Indonesia was increasing, the shares of prepared foods were also escalating. Living in urban areas, particularly in the capital city, contributed to less intake of traditional diets; which included lower expenditures for rice and higher expenditures for prepared foods (16). A recent study in Malaysia revealed that energy supply remained excessive, surpassing the average calorie requirement. Along with white rice as the main staple food, table sugar was the most widely consumed food in Malaysia. This dietary trend should be alarming for the country considering the rise of obesity prevalence and non-communicable diseases, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia in this country (17). De Nucci et al. reported an increase in UPF consumption globally, namely sweets, salty snacks, and packaged bread, despite a decline in other UPF groups (i.e., ready-to eat and delivery foods, sugary drinks) particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic (18).

A balanced diet with appropriate nutrient intake is recommended during pregnancy and lactation. However, previous studies highlighted that poor diet quality was predominant among healthy (19) and pregnant women in Indonesia (20). A similar dietary pattern among indigenous (21) and pregnant women (22) in Malaysia was also reported. Some studies showed that lactating women in Southeast Asian countries preferably consumed rice-based and high-fat diets to fulfil the calorie intake than adding protein source foods in their diets. This habit may lead the lactating women in this region to have low dietary quality and diversity, low protein consumption as well as low consumption of fruits and vegetables. This trend is also observed among European and Urban Chinese lactating women (23, 24). This trend of dietary pattern may affect the nutrient adequacy of pregnant and lactating women and will further influence maternal and child nutrition and health outcomes. Therefore, this review aimed to provide an overview of nutrient intake adequacy among pregnant and lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia, countries that are experiencing rapid nutrition transition in Southeast Asia. Findings of this review can be used to provide information and insight for planning the future strategy on nutrition and health intervention to prevent nutrient intake inadequacy among pregnant and lactating women in developing countries.

Materials and methods

Search strategy

The literature on nutrient intake in Indonesia and Malaysia was systematically searched through four electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, and Cochrane. A manual search was conducted when certain nutrient intakes were not found in the directories. The search strategy was designed to find published studies in English or Indonesian language. The search terms used are shown in the Supplementary Table 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) were used as a guideline for this systematic review. The protocol was submitted to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (registration number CRD42021252204).

Eligibility criteria

Nutrient intake and supplement consumption were determined as the outcomes during the selection of studies. Inclusion criteria of the study were published papers between the period of January 1980 and March 2021 that involved healthy and unhealthy pregnant and lactating women (mothers who breastfed children up to 2 years of age), assessed the quantity of dietary intake (i.e., kcal in energy; gr in macronutrient, etc.) using nutritional assessment methods that can quantify actual and habitual nutrient intake [24-h food recall, food record, and semi quantitative-food frequency questionnaire (SQ-FFQ)]. The exclusion criteria were applied to studies that had no abstract, were not in English or Indonesian language, had irrelevant topic, and were not human studies. Moreover, intervention studies were included if the baseline data were provided.

Data collection

The titles and abstracts were screened by two reviewers (FS and RM). Any disagreements over the included studies were resolved through discussions. The full text was assessed based on the exclusion criteria after the duplicate studies were removed. The flow diagram of studies using PRISMA guidelines is provided in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Prisma flow diagram of systematic review.

Extracted information of the eligible studies was summarized in Table 1 which describes the country, first author, year of publication, type of study, study population characteristics, dietary assessment method, nutrient assessment, and main findings. The analysis was performed for all studies by calculating the percentage of adequacy using national recommended daily allowances or nutrient intakes (RDA/RNI) and estimated average requirements (EAR) for micronutrients.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Studies characteristics of pregnant and lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia.

Data analysis

Studies of selected nutrients (protein, vitamin A, vitamin D, vitamin C, iron, zinc, and calcium) that provided mean and standard deviation without data transformation (e.g. logarithm transformation) were included in the meta-analysis. Standardized mean differences were calculated with the following criteria; (1) larger sample size was chosen if the study divided the subject into several groups; (2) data conversion to mean and standard deviation was made if the study only provided median, quartile, and interquartile range, according to a study by Wan et al. (76). Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4. In addition, the recommendation of each nutrients were determined by the RDA/RNI and adjusted by requirements of each trimesters for pregnant women; 1st and 2nd 6 months for lactating women. Statistics were presented with mean values and compared with Indonesian RDA and Malaysian RNI levels for macronutrient and micronutrients, labeled with “hypothesized” in forest plots. Heterogeneity among studies was assumed using a random effect model.

Risk of bias assessment

The risk of bias assessment was modified from Shahar et al. (77) that was specifically developed for nutrition science (i.e dietary assessment). The following information was rated: selection bias (sampling method used and representative of pregnant and lactating women); performance bias (dietary assessment method and measurement of usual intake); and reporting bias (excluded or included over/under-reporters and paid database/primary data collection). Scores ranged from 6 to 9 (low risk of bias), 10 to 13 (moderate risk of bias), and 14 to 16 (high risk of bias). The table was provided in Supplementary Table 2.

Results

Summary of research

In total, 2,258 articles were screened. After removing 655 duplicates, 1,603 articles were selected for the title and abstract review. Finally, 57 articles were assessed for full-text review. Four papers were excluded because the full texts were not found. Of 53 articles selected and presented in tables, 36 articles identified pregnant women and 17 mentioned lactating women as the subjects. Among these, 20 studies were carried out in Malaysia and 33 in Indonesia (Table 1). Most studies assessed dietary intakes using a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SQ-FFQ), while the remaining studies used single 24-h recall, repeated 24-h recall, food records, and FFQ.

Energy intake

Studies in Indonesia and Malaysia reported various energy intake (kcal/day) profiles among pregnant and lactating women. Assessments of energy intake among pregnant women in Malaysia were mainly conducted in the second and the third trimesters. Daily energy intakes in the second and the third trimesters ranged from 1,376 to 2,310 kcal (64.9–109% RNI), and from 2,021 to 2,042 kcal (87.5–87.9% RNI), respectively. In contrast, energy intake among pregnant women in Indonesia barely achieved 80% RDA. The first trimester of pregnancy had the lowest daily energy intake compared to other trimesters, ranging from 1,166 to 1,608 kcal (45.7–66.2% RDA). The energy intake range of the second trimester of Indonesian pregnant women was 1,269 to 2,096 kcal (49.8–82.2% RDA). Only one out of seven studies found the energy intake of the second trimester to be >80% RDA (57). Likewise, energy intake was also higher in the third trimester compared to the first and the second trimester ranging from 1,500 to 2,443.8 kcal (58.8–95.8% RDA).

Of three studies among Malaysian lactating women, Khor et al. (45) indicated the energy intake of lactating women 2–16 weeks after post-partum was between 94 and 105.6% RNI. In contrast, two other studies (2, 3) showed low energy intake in this population (<80 %RNI). In Indonesia, energy intake among lactating women ranged from 1,482 to 2,556 kcal (55.9–96.5% RDA). Marsubrin et al. (54) demonstrated a decreasing energy intake among lactating women through the weeks with an intake of <80% RDA.

Protein intake

All four studies conducted among the second and third trimesters of Malaysian pregnant women (47) showed a tendency toward high protein consumption (>90% RNI; range 69.9–83.9 g; 90.8–108% RNI). The average protein intake among Indonesian pregnant women ranged widely (42–106 g; 46.7–118% RDA) across the country. The highest protein intake was among pregnant women residing in West Sumatera (106.3 g; 118.1% RDA). The mean intake of protein in the first trimester was significantly lower (40 g; 65.6% RDA) than in the second trimester (47–71 g; 67.1–101.4% RDA) and the third trimester (48.9–106 g; 69.9–118% RDA) (12).

In Malaysia, protein intake among lactating women exceeded 80% of RNI (37.3–100.8 g; 51.8–142% RNI). Only one study in 1985 found a low protein intake in this population (46). Moreover, Khor et al. (45) reported an increase in protein intake according to three-time stages of lactation (83.6–94.3 g), which exceeded the respective RNI. Studies in Indonesia for protein intake in lactating women showed varied results, with most of the studies indicating a protein intake of 70% RDA. Recently, Marsubrin et al. (54) showed a decline in protein intake during the 4-week of lactation (64.6–57 g; 80.8–71.3% RDA).

Carbohydrate and fiber intake

Carbohydrate intake in Malaysian pregnant women did not meet the recommendation with a range of 245.6 to 306.4 g (63.8–81.9% RNI) (48, 49). Five studies among Indonesian pregnant women exhibited that carbohydrate intakes were > 60% RDA, but they failed to meet 100% RDA. Meanwhile, other studies showed intakes of this nutrient were < 60% RDA (35.9–54.9% RDA) (56, 64, 74, 78). Persson et al. (61) showed that carbohydrate intake changed significantly across the trimesters of pregnancy (282–347 g; 73.2–86.8% RDA).

Overall, the carbohydrate intake of lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia failed to meet 100% of the recommendation. Malaysia's studies reported a wide range of carbohydrate intake among lactating women (36.8–94.4% of RNI; 139.8–368.2 g) (29, 42, 45, 46). Khor et al. (45) recently declared the carbohydrate intake of this population achieved > 80% RNI. Indonesia's carbohydrate intake of lactating women ranged from 240.7 to 431 g (62.5–103.9% RDA). Only one study among lactating women in Indonesia conducted by de Pee et al. (60) in 1995 showed a carbohydrate intake reaching > 100% RDA. Studies on fiber intake among pregnant women in both countries were limited and the existing evidence consistently showed inadequate intake of fiber. In Indonesia, fiber intakes ranged from 25 to 28.9% RDA. Likewise, fiber intakes among Malaysian pregnant women ranged from 18.3 to 49.3% RNI. However, no studies for fiber intake among lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia were found.

Fat intake

Fat intake among pregnant women in Indonesia and Malaysia barely achieved 100% of the recommendation. In Malaysia, the fat intake among pregnant women failed to meet at least 80% RNI with a range of 69–72.4% RNI, while in Indonesia, the range of fat intake was wider, from 26.7 to 162.8% of RDA with two (12, 64) out of 10 studies revealing a fat intake of > 100% RDA (162.8% and 102.8%, respectively). Two studies by Angkasa (27, 28) showed the fat intake among pregnant women in the third trimester living in urban Jakarta was > 90% RDA (94.2–95.4%). Studies describing the total omega-3 fatty acid intake were limited only among Indonesian pregnant women with the mean intake of 1.3 g (96.4% RDA).

Studies in Malaysia indicated that a fat intake among lactating women ranged from 32.7 to 77.1 g (41.4–97.6% RNI). Saturated fat intake data was only found among Malaysian lactating women showing the intakes were consistently below the recommendation (2.9–17.3 g; 11–72.1% RNI). However, the fat intake among lactating women in Indonesia was higher than in Malaysia with a range of 57.8–73 g (86–108.6% RDA) and most intakes exceeded 80% RDA and reached 100% RDA (12, 64). A study by Angkasa et al. reported that Indonesian lactating women living in Jakarta had excessive fat intake of >30% from the total energy intake (27).

Fat-soluble vitamins

Vitamin A intake among pregnant and lactating women was the most studied fat-soluble vitamin. Ten studies assessing vitamin A intake among Indonesian pregnant women were mainly conducted in rural areas of Java Island with an overall range of 0.3–176.2% RDA (0.4–246.7% EAR). The lowest intake of vitamin A was 2 μg/day and the highest was 505.5–1,585.7 μg/day (61, 66). Some of the studies did not mention the gestational age of the pregnant women. A randomized trial among first-trimester pregnant women revealed that the average intake of vitamin A reached 27.2% RDA (38.1% EAR) for the intervention and 91% RDA (12.74% EAR) for control group (70). Three studies with subjects in the second trimester showed a range of vitamin A intake from 46.3 to 146.1% RDA (64.8–204.1% EAR). Five studies on vitamin A intake among lactating women were only available in Indonesia (rural areas of Java Island) with an intake range of 40.7–54.4% RDA (57–76.2% EAR). Only three studies on vitamin A intake among Malaysian pregnant women took place in health care facilities of urban or suburban areas, with one study in the second-trimester (37), one study in the third-trimester (48), and one study in both the second and the third-trimester of pregnancy (49), but none of the studies reported the intake of lactating women. These studies reported that the vitamin A intake among pregnant women met the minimum recommendation ranging between 119.9 and 148.6% RDA (167.8–208.1% EAR).

Four Indonesian studies (25, 41, 57, 70) and five Malaysian studies (812, 22, 31, 47, 71, 75) demonstrated that vitamin D intakes among pregnant women were <100% RDA/RNI, and mostly could not meet the EAR. The vitamin D intake in Indonesia ranged from 0% to 73.3% RDA (110% EAR), which was similar to the Malaysian intake ranging from 19.6% to 76.7% RDA (29.4–115% EAR). One Indonesian study expressed vitamin D intake in mcg 1,000 kcal/day (5.6 mcg 1,000 kcal/day) (41); therefore, the %RDA and %EAR was not calculated. No data was found for this nutrient among Indonesian and Malaysian lactating women.

Four studies reported vitamin E intake among Indonesian pregnant women to be between 0–42.7% RDA (0–51.2% EAR). These studies were conducted among the second trimester of anemic pregnant women (58, 59), during Ramadan fasting (64), using a case-control design among pregnant women with preeclampsia history and gestational age of >20 weeks (74), and with an experimental design study among the second trimester pregnant women (57). The lowest intake of vitamin E was among urban pregnant women who were exposed to the Ramadan fasting month (64). Data on vitamin E were not available for Indonesian lactating women as well as Malaysian pregnant and lactating women. No studies provided vitamin K intake among pregnant and lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia.

Water-soluble vitamins

Vitamin C was the most common nutrient intake assessed among pregnant and lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia, while studies on niacin, pyridoxine, folate, and cobalamin intakes were lacking. Data on water-soluble vitamin intake including thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, pyridoxine, folate, cobalamin, and vitamin C were scarce among lactating women in Malaysia.

Thiamine intake among Indonesian pregnant women as reported in five studies was predominantly < 60% RDA (43, 57, 64, 74, 75) ranging from 35.7 to 64.3% RDA (42.9–77.1% EAR). The majority of these studies were conducted among second- and third-trimester pregnant women. The highest thiamine intake was observed in a study conducted among pregnant women during Ramadan fasting (64). Three studies from West Java (14, 28, 58) showed the thiamine intake among Indonesian lactating women ranged from 66.7 to 93.3% RDA (80–112% EAR) which was higher than the intake of pregnant women. Compared to Indonesian data, three studies indicated a greater achievement to satisfy the recommendation of thiamine intake among second- and third-trimester Malaysian pregnant women [78.6% RNI (94.3% EAR)−1,443% RNI (1,731% EAR)] (37, 48, 49).

The range of riboflavin intake among second- and third-trimester Indonesian pregnant women in West Java was 38.5–123.1% RDA (46.2–147.7% EAR). Only one study by Suprapto et al. (66) found that the riboflavin intake among pregnant women met the Indonesian RDA and exceeded 100% EAR. Riboflavin intake among Malaysian pregnant women also exceeded the RNI as reported by two studies of Loy et al. (48, 49) and one study by Sawal Hamid et al. (37) with the lowest intake being 114.3% RNI (37). Studies among Indonesian lactating women showed the riboflavin intake ranged between 75 and 106.3% RDA (90–127.5% EAR) (14, 36, 63). No study was found on riboflavin intake among Malaysian lactating women.

Studies on niacin, pyridoxine, folate, and cobalamin intakes were fewer than studies of other vitamins. A case-control study among Indonesian pre-eclampsia and normotensive pregnant women reported that niacin intake achieved only 23.9–32.2% RDA (28.7–38.7% EAR) (74). Niacin intake among Indonesian lactating women achieved higher percentage of RDA compared to the pregnant women. However, this nutrient intake did not meet the recommended EAR, with a highest intake of 75.3% RDA (97.9% EAR). A study in Malaysia demonstrated a deficient niacin intake among pregnant women (6.1% RDA/7.9% EAR) (37), whereas two other studies reported greater percentages of RNI with the highest intake of 88.3% RNI (114.8 EAR) (48, 49). Pyridoxine intake among Indonesian pregnant women ranged from 63.2 to 65% RNI (75.8–78.9% EAR) (57, 58, 64, 74). Meanwhile, the pyridoxine intake among lactating women ranged from 57.9 to 68.4% RNI (69.5–82.1% EAR) (14, 36, 63). Five studies (57, 58, 64, 70, 74) found the folate intake among Indonesian pregnant women did not achieve even 50% RDA. The lowest and the highest folate intake among pregnant women was 0 (64) and 41.8% RDA (52.3% EAR) (70), respectively. A study (58) among Indonesian lactating women reported the folate intake to be 82.4% RNI (103% EAR). In contrast, a study among Malaysian pregnant women reported the folate intake to exceed the recommendation (323.7% RNI/420.7% EAR) (69). Cobalamin intake among Indonesian pregnant women was low as retrieved from four studies (57, 59, 70, 74) with the intake ranging from 22.2 to 98% RDA (26.7–117.6% EAR). Only one study reported that cobalamin intake reached 98% RDA and satisfied the EAR (57). Similarly, cobalamin intake among Indonesian lactating women only met half of the EAR; the highest intake was 50% RDA (60% EAR) (14, 36, 63).

The range of vitamin C intake among Indonesian pregnant women stretched from 1.9 to 309.9% RDA (2.3–371.9% EAR). Four studies in hospitals or health facilities reported the mean vitamin C intake among Malaysian pregnant women. One study in second-trimester pregnant women demonstrated an intake of 156.3% RNI (187.5% EAR) (37), two studies in the third trimester (48, 69) showed an intake range of 151.5–474.5% RNI (181.8–569.4% EAR), and one study in the second to the third trimester indicated intake between 120.5 and 159% RNI (144.6–190.8% EAR) (49). These numbers demonstrated that vitamin C intake in Malaysian pregnant women was noticeably higher than the Indonesians. Two studies among Indonesian lactating women residing in West Java (52, 63) reported the range of vitamin C intake to be from 15 to 31.7% RDA (18–38% EAR). In contrast with Malaysian data, most Indonesian studies showed that the vitamin C intake was mainly below the EAR. No studies reported intake of vitamin C among Malaysian lactating women.

Macro-minerals (calcium, magnesium, phosphorous, potassium, and sodium)

Among studies reporting the macro-mineral intake, calcium was the most studied in both Indonesian and Malaysian pregnant women (18 studies; nine studies in each country), which were commonly performed in the second and the third trimesters of pregnancy (12, 35, 3739, 43, 48, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 61, 64, 69, 7274). Indonesian studies showed the range of calcium intake among pregnant women to be from 14% RDA (17% EAR) to 780% RDA (936% EAR) (43, 74). Meanwhile, calcium intake among Malaysian pregnant women ranged from 45% RNI (53% EAR) to 101% RNI (122% EAR) (53, 69). Five studies assessed dietary calcium intake among lactating women in both countries (four studies in Indonesia, and one study in Malaysia). One study conducted among Indonesian exclusive breastfeeding women showed the insufficient calcium intake with the range from 39% RDA (47% EAR) (36) to 51% RDA (61.3% EAR) (14). In contrast, Malaysian data showed the calcium intake of 94% RNI (113% EAR) (68).

Two studies assessed the magnesium intake among Indonesian pregnant women in all trimesters, while no study was found in Malaysia. Magnesium intake among Indonesian pregnant women were below RDA (63.6–83.1% RDA), and not meeting the EAR (72.4–97.4% EAR) (64, 74). A study in Malaysia reported that the magnesium intake of Malaysian lactating women exceeded the recommendation (123.2% RNI; 131.7% EAR) (68).

Phosphorus intake among Indonesian pregnant women ranged from 92 to 165% RDA and exceeded the EAR (123–199% EAR) (64). Likewise, the intake of phosphorous among Malaysian pregnant women ranged from 138 to 172% RDA and exceeded the EAR (167–207% EAR) (49). Furthermore, phosphorous intake data among lactating women was only available in Malaysia, which showed the intake reached 95% RNI (114% EAR) (68).

Potassium intakes among pregnant women were below the EAR for Indonesian (15.6–42%) and Malaysian (33–53.1%) (74). The Indonesian lactating women were insufficient in potassium intake (17.6–21.5% RDA/32–39.2% EAR) (36). Meanwhile one study in Malaysia showed that the potassium intake of lactating women achieved 138.5% RNI (153% EAR) (68). Sodium intake among pregnant women in Indonesia showed a wide range from 19 to 157% EAR (35) while sodium intake data among lactating women was only available in Malaysia, with an intake of 88.7% EAR (68).

Trace elements (iron, iodine, zinc, chromium, manganese, molybdenum, selenium, copper, boron, and chloride)

Iron intake is the most commonly studied trace element intake in both Indonesia and Malaysia [five studies in Malaysian (37, 39, 48, 49, 69) and 12 studies in Indonesian pregnant women (32, 35, 38, 43, 51, 57, 58, 61, 64, 66, 70, 74); five studies in Indonesian (14, 36, 52, 60, 63) and one study in Malaysian lactating women (68)]. The majority of these studies reported that iron intake among Indonesian pregnant women was insufficient and unable to meet 100% EAR. A study among pregnant women in Malaysia showed that iron intake exceeded the recommendation (900% RNI/1,080% EAR), with the minimum intake being 60.3% RDA (72.4% EAR) (37, 39, 48, 49, 69). Two studies from Indonesia showed inadequate iron intake (65.5–72.2% RDA; 78.6–86.6% EAR) (14, 63), while three studies showed adequate iron intake (101.6–116.6% RDA; 122–140% EAR) among lactating women (36, 52, 60). Iron intake among Malaysian lactating women slightly exceeded the recommendation (123.8% RNI/148.5% EAR) (68).

Iodine intake among pregnant women in Indonesia was insufficient, with the highest intake being 32.5% RDA (44% EAR) (67). In contrast, data on lactating women was only available in a Malaysian study with an intake of 73% EAR (68).

Studies about zinc intake among pregnant women were only found in Indonesia, which were conducted in all trimesters throughout pregnancy. Four of seven studies showed inadequate zinc intake among pregnant women in Indonesia ranging from 21.3 to 72.4% RDA (25.5–86.9% EAR) (57, 58, 70, 74), and two studies showed adequate intake of zinc (83.3–110% RDA/100–132.5% EAR) (35, 51). One particular study assessing zinc intake among Indonesian pregnant women showed sufficient range (52.5–97% RDA/63–116.5% EAR) (64). Zinc intake among Indonesian lactating women ranged from 71.5 to 100% RDA (85.8–120% EAR) (14, 36, 52, 63). Similarly, data from Malaysian lactating women showed a zinc intake of 89.5% RNI (107.3% EAR) (68).

Data for chromium, manganese, molybdenum, selenium, boron, and chloride intakes for pregnant women were unavailable in both countries. However, we found a study that assessed intakes of chromium, manganese, molybdenum, and selenium for Malaysian lactating women, reporting 71.1%, 73.1%, 97.2%, and 91.7% of RNI for these nutrients, respectively (68). A study of copper intake among pregnant women was only found in Indonesia, reporting the intake of 66% RDA (82.5% EAR) (58). Meanwhile, copper intake for lactating women was only reported in a Malaysian study, with the intake of 61.5% RNI (68).

Meta-analysis and publication bias

Protein intake

Figure 2A presents a meta-analysis of 21 studies in Indonesia (17 studies) and Malaysia (four studies), which indicates the overall protein consumption among pregnant women altogether failed to meet the recommendation of this nutrient (SMD: −2.19; 95% CI: −2.90, −1.48). However, a separate analysis of four studies in Malaysia indicated that pregnant women had higher protein consumption as compared to the national intake recommendation for this nutrient (57, 13), with an average excess intake of 5 gr/day (106.4% RNI) (Figure 2C). In contrast, the Indonesian studies showed a deficit intake of protein among pregnant women for about 18 g/day.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. MMeta-analysis of studies on protein intake among (A) pregnant women in both countries (B) lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia and (C) pregnant women in Malaysia (mean difference in gram).

Seven studies from both countries among lactating women were analyzed (Figure 2B). Overall SMD is −0.65 (95% CI: −1.31, 0.01) suggesting the protein intake of this population tended to be lower than the recommendation. Three studies from Malaysia indicated a higher intake of this nutrient than the national recommendation with the average excess intake of 16.6 gr/day (123.1% RNI). Otherwise, studies in Indonesia reported that lactating women had an average deficit intake of this nutrient for about 11.9 g/day (80.5% RDA).

Vitamin A, D, and C intake

As shown in Figure 3A, eleven studies were selected for a meta-analysis of vitamin A intake among pregnant women. The vitamin A intake in Indonesia and Malaysia of this population met the EAR levels (SMD 0.89; 95% CI: 0.29, 1.50) with an average excess intake of 428.2 mcg/day.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. (A) Meta-analysis of studies on vitamin A, (B) vitamin D, and (C) vitamin C intakes among pregnant women in Indonesia and Malaysia.

Nine studies assessing vitamin D intake (mcg/day) among pregnant women in Indonesia and Malaysia were included in the meta-analysis (Figure 3B). The vitamin D intakes in this population in both countries tended not to achieve the recommendation (SMD −0.47; 95% CI: −1.61, 0.67), with an average deficit of 2.36 mcg/day (77.7% EAR). Meanwhile Yong et al. (73) presented a significant 2 mcg/day higher intake of vitamin D among pregnant women as compared to the 100% EAR for this nutrient.

Figure 3C highlights that the overall vitamin C intake among pregnant women in Malaysia and Indonesia was lower than the 100% EAR (SMD −0.24; 95% CI: −1.02, 0.53). The insufficient intake of this nutrient mostly came from Indonesian studies, with an average deficit of 68.73 mg/day (EAR). Nonetheless, three studies from Malaysia reported that the vitamin C intakes were greater than the 100% EAR, with an average intake of 132.9 mg/day (121.4% EAR).

Iron, zinc, and calcium intake

A meta-analysis of 13 studies (Figure 4A) showed inadequate iron intake among Indonesian and Malaysian pregnant women with an overall SMD of −0.48 (95% CI: −1.12, 0.15).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Meta-analysis of studies on iron intake (A) among pregnant women and (B) lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia.

On the contrary, six studies among Indonesian and Malaysian lactating women indicated a tendency for higher iron intake than 100% EAR (Figure 4B) with an SMD of 0.22 (95%CI: −0.51, 0.96) and the average excess was 2.32 mg/day in both countries.

Figure 5A presents the zinc intakes of Indonesian pregnant women (n = 5 studies) that exceeded the optimal EAR levels with average excess of 2.55 mg/day (SMD 0.6; 95% CI: 0.06, 1.14).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Meta-analysis of studies on (A) zinc intake and (B) calcium intake among pregnant women in Indonesia and Malaysia.

Figure 5B highlights the findings of 20 studies from Indonesia and Malaysia indicating the calcium intake among pregnant women was below 100% EAR levels (SMD −2.30; 95% CI: −3.11, −1.48), with an average deficit of 351.83 mg/day.

Result of bias

A low to high risk of bias was found in this study. The total score of the bias assessment are shown in Supplementary Table 2. Moreover, funnel plots for certain nutrients included in the meta-analysis are presented in Supplementary Figures 13, with distributions of points to the left and right.

Discussion

The present review discovered that the energy and macro-nutrient intakes among Indonesian and Malaysian pregnant and lactating women (53 studies) were below RDA/RNI. Water- and fat-soluble vitamin intakes failed to meet the recommendation and were mainly lower than 80% EAR, except for vitamin C and A in Malaysian pregnant women. Macro-minerals (calcium and potassium among pregnant women and Indonesian lactating women; magnesium in Indonesian pregnant women) and trace element (iron in pregnant women in both countries; iodine in Indonesian pregnant women and Malaysian lactating women) intakes tended to be insufficient. Moreover, zinc intake was adequate among pregnant women in Indonesia, but no zinc intake study was found in Malaysia. Dietary intakes of these nutrients exceeded 100% EAR (Phosphorus intake for pregnant women in both countries, sodium intake in Malaysian pregnant women, as well as calcium and potassium intakes in Malaysian lactating women). To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of nutrient intake among pregnant and lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia. A thorough review with a double-screening approach was performed to assure the quality of the data in the systematic review.

Macronutrient intake

The energy intake of Indonesian and Malaysian pregnant women exhibited a similar pattern of not meeting the national recommendation. A comparable finding was also observed in a study conducted among pregnant women in Thailand (79). On the contrary, Nguyen et al. (80) found that energy intake achieved the RNI among Vietnamese pregnant women with light physical activity but failed to meet RNI for those with moderate physical activity. The inadequate energy intake might be caused by seasonal food availability, cultural prohibition, and lack of knowledge (7981). Moreover, food restriction during pregnancy could cause mothers to have lower energy intake and lower consumption of diverse foods than the recommendation (82). A study by Ding et al. found that energy and protein intakes among pregnant women decreased along with decreasing economic quintiles (83), which was also supported by a study done in Nepal (84) showing wealthier women were more likely to consume diverse diets than the poorer. This review found that energy intake was lower in the first trimester of pregnancy compared to the second and the third, predominantly due to nausea and vomiting (14, 15, 85).

Despite the need to increase energy requirements among lactating women to produce sufficient breast milk (86), our present review demonstrated that the energy intake among Indonesian and Malaysian lactating women failed to meet the national recommendation. This finding is similar to the study in China indicating almost 83% of lactating women had lower energy intake (83). A study conducted among Indonesian lactating women revealed that low energy intake was caused by the lack of knowledge, being exhausted, and limited time to prepare the foods (87). A socioeconomic factor might also contribute to the inadequate energy intake of lactating women in Indonesia (16). Although the energy intake of lactating women in both socioeconomic conditions was insufficient, much lower energy adequacy was found in low socioeconomic than in high socioeconomic women (17). A few studies in Malaysia indicated that low energy intake among lactating women was affected by food restriction due to a belief that lactating mothers were in a “cold state” after delivery. Restriction of consuming certain types of foods was believed to balance the hot and cold states of the body (29, 88).

Our review and meta-analysis also found that the protein intakes among Malaysian pregnant and lactating women were adequate. Yong et al. reported that Malaysian lactating women had perceived belief that protein rich foods such as meat, cheese, and milk products benefit the infant growth and development (22). The existence of food taboos among pregnant women in some cultures to certain protein source foods such as seafoods may hinder the consumption of these foods. It was believed that these foods contained high cholesterol and caused complications during delivery (29, 88). Furthermore, a high protein intake in pregnant and lactating women in Malaysia followed the same intake pattern of Malaysian adults. A recent review by Shahar et al. (77) indicated that the total protein intake among Malaysian adults remained higher than the national recommendation. The consumption of excessive-high protein food source might develop the risk of diet-related diseases and impact fetal development. However, lower protein intake during pregnancy was associated with adverse effects on the weight and length of the baby at birth (89). Goh et al. stated that Malaysia was under the “substitution phase” of nutrition transition, characterized by shifting in many types of foods without having any changes in the overall energy supply. This condition caused an increase in animal source foods, along with a reduction in legumes, fruits, and vegetables consumptions (17).

This present review discovered that studies of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids intakes among pregnant and lactating women in both countries were limited. One study in Indonesian pregnant women indicated inadequate intake of these nutrients. This result was not aligned with a study conducted in China showing the omega-3 fatty acid intake among pregnant women was higher than the recommendation (89). Many studies demonstrated the healthful benefits of omega-3 fatty acids, in increasing gestation length, birth weight and length. Omega-3 fatty acid have anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory properties that could decrease the risk of preeclampsia (90, 91).

Most studies reported low carbohydrate intakes among pregnant and lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia (only met 60–80% of RDA/RNI). Lower carbohydrate intake among obese pregnant women had been associated with lower fat mass in the offspring (92). In the GUSTO Study, lower carbohydrate intake among pregnant women in Singapore was associated with lower abdominal, internal tissue in newborn babies (92). Moreover, fiber intakes of Malaysian and Indonesian pregnant and lactating women were low, with a range of 20–40% of RDA/RNI.

Vitamin intake

We discovered the vitamin intakes among pregnant and lactating women were different between Indonesia and Malaysia. Most studies suggested adequate intakes of vitamin A based on the EAR, except for Indonesian lactating women. Study in Indonesia suggested that although vitamin A intake of the women was adequate (predominantly from vegetables consumption), the serum retinol in this population was low (93). Rahmannia et al. (63) previously highlighted that lactating mothers commonly consumed starchy staples, which provided little contribution to fulfill intakes of vitamins, including vitamin A. Therefore, lactating women in Indonesia are recommended to consume a high dosage of vitamin A supplementation as one of the national nutrition programs. Some studies in several areas in Indonesia reported that most mothers consumed vitamin A supplements (94, 95) but the program coverage of this supplementation was greater in urban areas than in rural areas (96). Lactating women did not consume any vitamin A supplements due to lack of knowledge and information given by the health workers or midwives (94).

Almost all vitamin B intakes were inadequate and could not meet the expected EAR among pregnant and lactating women, particularly in Indonesia. While in Malaysia, our findings suggested that vitamin B intake exceeded the recommendation. Some studies recorded inadequate vitamin B intakes among adults (97) and pre-conception women (98) in Indonesia. Unfortunately, the retrieved studies did not further explain information on vitamin B source foods contributing to the intake. Indonesian typical diet comprises mainly carbohydrate source foods, a small portion of protein source foods, and vegetables rich in vitamin B. Meanwhile, Yong et al. found that the dietary pattern in Malaysia in the early stage of pregnancy was considered prudent, with high intakes of nuts, seeds, legumes, vegetables, and dairy products (13, 99) that may contribute to vitamin B intake.

The mean vitamin C intake among Malaysian pregnant women exceeded the RNI and was greater than the intake of Indonesian pregnant women who had lower intake of this nutrient than the expected vitamin C EAR. A review done by Caut et al. reported that pregnant women in Malaysia frequently adhered to the recommendations for fruits consumption as a source of vitamin C (100). However, another study mentioned that fruit and vegetable consumptions were inadequate in Malaysian pregnant women (49, 101). Previous studies and national reports in Indonesia often mentioned that fruit and vegetable consumption is a major concern in Indonesia. However, studies from Indonesia did not provide further detail on the diet or vitamin C source foods (102).

Vitamin D intake was inadequate among Malaysian and Indonesian pregnant and lactating women. Woon (71) stated that the majority of pregnant women relied on foods as the main source of vitamin D. Fish and fish products, milk and milk products, and eggs were the main food contributing to vitamin D intake among Malaysian pregnant women. Although dietary sources of vitamin D were not commonly and adequately consumed and vitamin D-fortified foods were limited in low-middle income countries, abundant sunlight in Indonesia and Malaysia should allow direct sun exposure to the skin and become a potential source of the vitamin D to meet its requirement. However, vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency were widespread, not only among pregnant women (9, 20, 21), but also across population from newborns (103), children (104), adolescents (105, 106), adults (22), and elderly (107) in these countries. Countries in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa were frequently reported to have a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiencies. Sun-protective behaviors related to culture or religion, such as covering skin, wearing hats, applying sunscreen, and limiting outdoor activities, were the main factors associated with vitamin D deficiencies (108). In contrast, the consumption of vitamin D-rich foods such as oil rich fish and dairy products in European countries was remarkable, although the sunlight exposure was not as much in this region. Existing policies on vitamin D supplementation and food fortification in Europe and other countries such as USA, Canada, and India may facilitate the population to adequately consume this nutrient. This policy was also accompanied with the encouragement to increase outdoor activities which can provide sun exposure to enhance vitamin D synthesis on the skin (109, 110).

Dietary supplements consumption was not a common practice among pregnant and lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia (9, 19, 20), unless it was given by the health workers. A recent large survey among Malaysian adults found only 28.1% of women were more likely to consume the vitamin/mineral supplements (101). In contrast, 77% of pregnant and 70.3% lactating women in US consumed one or more dietary supplements, which were significantly higher than the consumption of non-pregnant and non-lactating women (111). Study done by Daud et al. reported that Malaysian pregnant women had a good knowledge and awareness on the role of dietary supplements during pregnancy, but only half of the pregnant women took dietary supplements mainly to overcome anemia (112). It was also aligned with the national program in providing iron pills (hematinic) to pregnant women in Malaysia. In Indonesia, the national program of iron-folic acid (IFA) tablets for pregnant women and vitamin A supplementation for lactating women (96) have been established, yet wide-scale supplementation program and study on the application of vitamin D among pregnant women was scarce. Altogether, vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has not been included in the national program for Indonesia and Malaysia (25, 26, 41, 47).

Macro-minerals and trace elements intake

The data from Indonesia Health Survey showed an increased prevalence of anemia among pregnant women from 37.1% in 2013 to 48.9% in 2018 (113, 114). Meanwhile, data from National Health and Morbidity Survey in Malaysia showed a declined prevalence of anemia from 2015 to 2019 from 24.6% to 21.3% (115, 116). Most studies showed that the iron intake of pregnant women was below the recommendation of the National Dietary Guidelines in Indonesia and Malaysia. This inadequate intake of iron may cause iron deficiency, which is one of the most prominent causes of anemia among pregnant women. RDA for iron intake during pregnancy is 27 mg per day based on IOM 2001, which is set at a level for women begin storing iron in their early pregnancy. However, a study by Machmud et al. found that pregnant women in Indonesia commonly consumed plant-based protein food, that were considerably low in iron content (117). A study by Sawal Hamid et al. (37) showed that iron and vitamin B3 among pregnant women in Malaysia was difficult to meet the recommendation without supplements or fortified foods. Therefore, supporting the guideline for iron pills supplementation help to increase consumption of iron during pregnancy. In this review, we found that the iron intake was significantly higher than the recommendation in lactating women. Compared to pregnant women, lactating women often consumed more foods as they had better appetite and willingness to produce adequate breastmilk (86).

Our meta-analysis from five studies available only in Indonesia, not in Malaysia, showed that the zinc intake among pregnant women was above the recommendation, in contrast with their iron intake profile. This finding is not in line with the previous study by Lim et al., in which inadequacy of iron intake was often associated with low zinc intake as both nutrients were rich in similar animal protein food sources (118).

Our present study found inadequate calcium intake among pregnant women, which was below the recommended intake based on the National Dietary Guidelines of Indonesia and Malaysia. Similarly, a study on the global trend of micronutrient intake by Beal et al. (119) showed that both iron and calcium were the most insufficient micronutrient intakes. The result from this study was similar to the calcium intake among pregnant women in another South-east Asia country, Thailand, that showed the intake of 602.4 mg/day (120). In contrast, a systematic review and meta analysis by Cormick et al. (121) indicated that the calcium intake in high-income countries ranged from 283 to 2,228 mg/day, which was much higher than the intake in low middle-income countries (210 to 1,631 mg/day).

Assessments of iodine intake were only available in one study among Indonesian pregnant women and one study among Malaysian lactating women, which demonstrated inadequate intake of this nutrient. Iodine intake in Indonesian study was estimated based on the result from the National Health Survey and National Total Diet Study covering urban and rural women (67), whereas in Malaysia iodine intake was evaluated based on the study conducted in certain urban city of Kuala Lumpur (68). In terms of iodine status, Lim et al. (122) discovered that 60% of pregnant women who lived in rural areas of Sabah, Malaysia had median urinary iodine concentrations of <150 μg/L. Meanwhile, a study in suburb area of Central Java, Indonesia, showed that 13.8% of pregnant women had low median urinary iodine concentration (<150 μg/L), this proportion increased in each trimester. The biggest source of daily iodine consumption was iodized salt, while food sources of iodine were less consumed in pregnant women (123). The previous study confirmed that iodized salt and daily supplementation of iodine capsules had similar effects in determining the iodine status and thyroid hormones. This finding underlined the importance of a universal iodized salt program (124).

Limitations of the study

Few limitations were addressed in this study. As mentioned above, the macro and micronutrient dietary intake data were limited among pregnant and lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia. Therefore, this review summarized all eligible studies including those with moderate to high risk of bias. Since the recommended intake of pregnant women was different in each trimester, it was challenging to draw the average percentage of excessive or deficit intake in terms of RNI/RDA/EAR in meta-analysis. Thus, we only provided the percentage of certain nutrients which had a similar recommendation. The various nutritional assessment methods applied in the available studies may cause discrepancy in estimating and providing significant range of the dietary intake.

Our result also demonstrated that studies on pregnant women in the first trimester and lactating women were lacking. Thus, future research should consider focusing on these populations, along with more exploration to nutrient of interest with limited data, such as vitamin E, vitamin K, vitamin B, macro-minerals, and trace elements.

Conclusion

In summary, the overall findings of this comprehensive review of dietary intake indicated that Indonesian and Malaysian pregnant and lactating women had insufficient intake of essential nutrients. Dietary intakes of energy, macronutrients, and micronutrients (vitamin D, vitamin E, water-soluble vitamins, calcium, and iron) of pregnant and lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia were below the recommendations. Important heterogeneities were observed even between these two countries for specific essential nutrient intakes. Innovative research and targeted programs to address specific deficiencies should be prioritized. Promotive and preventive national programs to improve maternal nutrient intake can be implemented such as promoting maternal diet rich in nutrients even before conception, reevaluating the required supplementation during pregnancy and lactation for specific nutrient deficiencies, enhancing compliance of the current dietary supplementation and initiating the implementation of multi-micro-nutrient supplementation for pregnant women. Fortified and functional food formulations targeted these populations could be explored as the alternative mode in ensuring the nutrient content of specific food products. The utilization of digital technology to educate proper nutrition and promote healthy diet practice for pregnant and lactating women should be enhanced and financed.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: RA, DR, VS, and WL. Methodology and validation: RA, DR, and WL. Software, visualization, and project administration: DR. Formal analysis: WL, FB, and RM. Writing—original draft preparation: RA, WL, FB, and RM. Writing—review and editing, supervision, and funding acquisition: RA. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Blackmores Institute (Research and Education Division of Blackmores Limited) and Universitas Indonesia through PUTI Q1 DRPM UI 2022 to RA (Number: NKB-433/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2022).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledged the administrative and technical supports from Francine Tay, and Pui-Kuun Ng (Blackmores Institute); Dr. Erfi Prafiantini, Hanifa, Ummu Maratul Udzma, and Atikah (Human Nutrition Research Center IMERI), Arini Ayatika Sadariskar, and Pusat Pengembangan Kedokteran Indonesia Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia (PUSBANGKI FKUI).

Conflict of interest

VS was employed by Blackmores Institute, Blackmores Limited.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2023.1030343/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Tieu J, Shepherd E, Middleton P, Crowther CA. Dietary advice interventions in pregnancy for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2017) 2017:CD006674. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006674.pub3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Haider BA, Bhutta ZA. Multiple-micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2015) 2015:CD004905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004905.pub4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Tejayanti T. Determinants of chronic energy deficiency and low body mass index of pregnant women in Indonesia. J Kesehat Reproduksi. (2020) 10:173–80. doi: 10.22435/kespro.v10i2.2403

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Wubie A, Seid O, Eshetie S, Dagne S, Menber Y, Wasihun Y, et al. Determinants of chronic energy deficiency among non-pregnant and non-lactating women of reproductive age in rural Kebeles of Dera District, North West Ethiopia, 2019: unmatched case control study. PLoS ONE. (2020) 15:e0241341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241341

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lipoeto NI, Nindrea RD. Nutritional contributors to maternal anemia in Indonesia: chronic energy deficiency and micronutrients. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. (2020) 29:S9–17. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.202012_29(S1).02

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kumar KJ, Asha N, Murthy DS, Sujatha M, Manjunath V. Maternal anemia in various trimesters and its effect on newborn weight and maturity: an observational study. Int J Prev Med. (2013) 4:193–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

7. Wibowo N, Bardosono S, Irwinda R, Syafitri I, Putri AS, Prameswari N. Assessment of the nutrient intake and micronutrient status in the first trimester of pregnant women in Jakarta. Med J Indones. (2017) 26:109–15. doi: 10.13181/mji.v26i2.1617

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Blumfield ML, Hure AJ, Macdonald-Wicks L, Smith R, Collins CE. Micronutrient intakes during pregnancy in developed countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. (2013) 71:118–32. doi: 10.1111/nure.12003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. World Health Organization. Prevalence of Anaemia in Women Aged 15–49, by Pregnancy Status (%) (2022). Available online at: https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/4552 (accessed December 22, 2022).

10. Georgieff MK. Iron deficiency in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2020) 223:516–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Jamil NA, Shahudin NN, Aziz NSA, Qi CJ, Aminuddin WAAW, Ludin AFM, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice related to vitamin D and its relationship with vitamin D status among Malay female office workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:e4735. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234735

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Aji AS, Yerizel E, Desmawati D, Lipoeto NI. Low maternal vitamin D and calcium food intake during pregnancy associated with place of residence: a cross-sectional study in West Sumatran Women, Indonesia. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. (2019) 7:2879–85. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.659

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Yong HY, Shariff ZM, Mohd Yusof BN, Rejali Z, Bindels J, Tee YYS, et al. Associations between the dietary patterns of pregnant Malaysian women and ethnicity, education, and early pregnancy waist circumference: a prospective cohort study. Nutr Res Pract. (2019) 13:230–9. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2019.13.3.230

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Daniels L, Gibson RS, Diana A, Haszard JJ, Rahmannia S, Luftimas DE, et al. Micronutrient intakes of lactating mothers and their association with breast milk concentrations and micronutrient adequacy of exclusively breastfed Indonesian infants. Am J Clin Nutr. (2019) 110:391–400. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Harmayani E, Anal AK, Wichienchot S, Bhat R, Gardjito M, Santoso U, et al. Healthy food traditions of Asia: Exploratory case studies from Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, and Nepal. J Ethn Foods. (2019) 6:1–18. doi: 10.1186/s42779-019-0002-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Colozza D, Avendano M. Urbanisation, dietary change and traditional food practices in Indonesia: a longitudinal analysis. Soc Sci Med. (2019) 233:103–12. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.06.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Goh E Von, Azam-Ali S, McCullough F, Roy Mitra S. The nutrition transition in Malaysia; Key drivers and recommendations for improved health outcomes. BMC Nutr. (2020) 6:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s40795-020-00348-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. De Nucci S, Zupo R, Castellana F, Sila A, Triggiani V, Lisco G, et al. Public health response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: concern about ultra-processed food consumption. Foods. (2022) 11:950. doi: 10.3390/foods11070950

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Stefani S, Ngatidjan S, Paotiana M, Sitompul KA, Abdullah M, Sulistianingsih DP, et al. Dietary quality of predominantly traditional diets is associated with blood glucose profiles, but not with total fecal Bifidobacterium in Indonesian women. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208815

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Siregar DAS, Rianda D, Irwinda R, Utami AD, Hanifa H, Shankar AH, et al. Associations between diet quality, blood pressure, and glucose levels among pregnant women in the Asian megacity of Jakarta. PLoS ONE. (2020) 15:e0242150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Chong SP, Appannah G, Sulaiman N. Predictors of diet quality as measured by Malaysian healthy eating index among aboriginal women (Mah Meri) in Malaysia. Nutrients. (2019) 11:135. doi: 10.3390/nu11010135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Yong HY, Mohd Shariff Z, Koo SJ, Binti Sa'ari NS. Pre-pregnancy body mass index, height and physical activity are associated with rate of gestational weight gain among Malaysian mothers. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. (2016) 42:1094–101. doi: 10.1111/jog.13039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Fahmi I, Purwestri RC, Lauvai J, Barati Z, Bell W, Wirawan NN. Dietary intake and nutritional status of Javanese women in rice producing areas: a comparison between lactating and non-lactating women. Indones J Hum Nutr. (2021) 8:139. doi: 10.21776/ub.ijhn.2021.008.02.5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Chaparro C, Oot L, Sethuraman K. Overview of the Nutrition Situation in Seven Countries in Southeast Asia. FHI 360/FANTA: Washington DC (2014).

25. Aji AS, Yerizel E, Lipoeto NI. The association between lifestyle and maternal vitamin D during pregnancy in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. (2018) 27:1286–93. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.201811_27(6).0016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Aji AS, Erwinda E, Yusrawati Y, Malik SG, Lipoeto NI. Vitamin D deficiency status and its related risk factors during early pregnancy: a cross-sectional study of pregnant Minangkabau women, Indonesia. BMC Preg Childbirth. (2019) 19:183. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2341-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Angkasa D, Tambunan V, Khusun H, Witjaksono F, Agustina R. Inadequate dietary α-linolenic acid intake among Indonesian pregnant women is associated with lower newborn weights in urban Jakarta. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. (2017) 26:S9–18. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.062017.s1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Angkasa D, Agustina R, Khusun H, Prafiantini E. Validation of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for estimating dietary omega-3 fatty acids intake among urban Indonesian pregnant women. Malays J Nutr. (2019) 25:321–35. doi: 10.31246/mjn-2019-0027

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Munirah S, Basir A, Ghani RA, Ibrahim M, Muzaffar M, Khan Khattak A, et al. Dietary intake of mothers who practised traditional confinement during exclusive breastfeeding period. Malaysian J Med Health Sci. (2019) 15:2636–46.

Google Scholar

30. Basir SMA, Ghani RA, Ibrahim M, Khattak MMAK, Omar MN, Shukri NAM. Maternal diet and its association with human milk energy and macronutrient composition among exclusively breastfeeding Malaysian Malay mothers. Malays J Nutr. (2019) 25:309–20. doi: 10.31246/mjn-2019-0020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Bukhary NBI, Isa ZM, Shamsuddin K, Lin KG, Mahdy ZA, Hassan H, et al. Risk factors for antenatal hypovitaminosis D in an urban district in Malaysia. BMC Preg Childbirth. (2016) 16:4–13. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0939-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Wijaya-Erhardt M, Muslimatun S, Erhardt JG. Fermented soyabean and vitamin C-rich fruit: a possibility to circumvent the further decrease of iron status among iron-deficient pregnant women in Indonesia. Public Health Nutr. (2011) 14:2185–96. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011000954

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Fikawati S, Syafiq A, Djokosujono K, Irawati A, Karima K. Comparison of lactational performance of vegetarian and non-vegetarian mothers in Indonesia. Malays J Nutr. (2014) 20:27–37.

Google Scholar

34. Fikawati S, Syafiq A. Maternal calorie intake is a significant factor associated with 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding among lactating mothers in Depok City, Indonesia. Malays J Nutr. (2017) 23:31–41.

Google Scholar

35. Hartriyanti Y, Suyoto PST, Muhammad HFL, Palupi IR. Nutrient intake of pregnant women in Indonesia: a review. Malays J Nutr. (2012) 18:113–24.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

36. Gibson RS, Rahmannia S, Diana A, Leong C, Haszard JJ, Hampel D, et al. Association of maternal diet, micronutrient status, and milk volume with milk micronutrient concentrations in Indonesian mothers at 2 and 5 months postpartum. Am J Clin Nutr. (2020) 112:1039–50. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Sawal Hamid ZB, Rajikan R, Elias SM, Jamil NA. Utilization of a diet optimization model in ensuring adequate intake among pregnant women in Selangor, Malaysia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:e4720. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234720

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Hartini TNS, Winkvist A, Lindholm L, Stenlund H, Persson V, Nurdiati DS, et al. Nutrient intake and iron status of urban poor and rural poor without access to rice fields are affected by the emerging economic crisis: the case of pregnant Indonesian women. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2003) 57:654–66. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601595

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Hasbullah FY, Mohd Yusof BN, Shariff ZM, Rejali Z, Yong HY, Mitri J. Factors associated with dietary glycemic index and glycemic load in pregnant women and risk for gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Food Sci Nutr. (2020) 71:516–24. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2019.1686752

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Hassan H, Manaf RA, Said SM, Appannah G. The effectiveness of theory-based intervention to improve haemoglobin levels among women with anaemia in pregnancy. Med J Malaysia. (2020) 75:626–34.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

41. Ilmiawati C, Oviana A, Friadi A, Reza M. Sunlight exposed body surface area is associated with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level in pregnant Minangkabau women, Indonesia. BMC Nutr. (2020) 6:18. doi: 10.1186/s40795-020-00342-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Kamaruzzaman PAA, Ghani RA, Ibrahim M, Shukri NAM. The association of maternal diet and polyamines in human milk: a study among Malay ethnic mothers in Kuantan, Malaysia. Int J Eng Technol. (2018) 7:287–91. doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.13334

CrossRef Full Text

43. Kardjati S, Kusin JA, De With C. Energy supplementation in the last trimester of pregnancy in East Java: I. Effect on birthweight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. (1988) 95:783–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06553.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Kardjati S, Kusin JA, Schofield WM, De With C. Energy supplementation in the last trimester of pregnancy in East Java, Indonesia: effect on maternal anthropometry. Am J Clin Nutr. (1990) 52:987–94. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/52.6.987

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Khor GL, Tan SS, Stoutjesdijk E, Ng KWT, Khouw I, Bragt M, et al. Temporal changes in breast milk fatty acids contents: a case study of Malay breastfeeding women. Nutrients. (2021) 13:1–13. doi: 10.3390/nu13010101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Kneebone GM, Kneebone R, Gibson RA. Fatty acid composition of breast milk from three racial groups from Penang, Malaysia. Am J Clin Nutr. (1985) 41:765–9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/41.4.765

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Lee SS, Subramaniam R, Tusimin M, Ling KH, Rahim KF, Loh SP. Inadequate vitamin D intake among pregnant women in Malaysia based on revised recommended nutrient intakes value and potential dietary strategies to tackle the inadequacy. Nutr Res Pract. (2020) 14:492–503. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2021.15.4.492

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Loy SL, Marhazlina M, Azwany YN, Hamid Jan JM. Higher intake of fruits and vegetables in pregnancy is associated with birth size. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. (2011) 42:1214–23.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

49. Loy SL, Marhazlina M, Nor AY, Hamid JJM. Development, validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire in pregnancy for the Universiti Sains Malaysia birth cohort study. Malays J Nutr. (2011) 17:1–18.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

50. Loy SL, Marhazlina M, Jan JMH. Association between maternal food group intake and birth size. Sains Malays. (2013) 42:1633–40.

Google Scholar

51. Madanijah S, Briawan D, Rimbawan R, Zulaikhah Z, Andarwulan N, Nuraida L, et al. Nutritional status of pre-pregnant and pregnant women residing in Bogor district, Indonesia: a cross-sectional dietary and nutrient intake study. Br J Nutr. (2016) 116:S57–66. doi: 10.1017/S000711451600057X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Madanijah S, Rimbawan R, Briawan D, Zulaikhah Z, Andarwulan N, Nuraida L, et al. Nutritional status of lactating women in Bogor district, Indonesia: cross-sectional dietary intake in three economic quintiles and comparison with pre-pregnant women. Br J Nutr. (2016) 116:S67–74. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516001306

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Mahdy ZA, Basri H, Md Isa Z, Ahmad S, Shamsuddin K, Mohd Amin R. Antenatal calcium intake in Malaysia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. (2014) 40:983–7. doi: 10.1111/jog.12277

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Marsubrin PMT, Rohsiswatmo R, Sjarif DR. Preterm human milk composition and dietary intake of breastfeeding mothers in the Indonesian population. Paediatr Indones Indones. (2021) 61:20–4. doi: 10.14238/pi61.1.2021.20-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Mohamed HJJ, Rowan A, Fong B, Loy SL. Maternal serum and breast milk vitamin D levels: findings from the Universiti Sains Malaysia pregnancy cohort study. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:3–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100705

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Mutalazimah M, Wijaya YA, Suswardany DL. Energy, protein intake and mid-upper arm circumference in pregnant women in Boyolali Regency, Indonesia. Malaysian J Med Heal Sci. (2020) 16:77–83.

Google Scholar

57. Nadimin, Hadju V, As'ad S, Buchari A, Haruna I, Hartono R. Increasing of nutrition status of pregnant women after supplementation of moringa leaf extract (Moringa oliefera) in the coastal area of Makassar, Indonesia. Indian J Public Heal Res Dev. (2019) 10:521–5. doi: 10.5958/0976-5506.2019.00102.5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Nahrisah P, Plianbangchang S, Somrongthong R, Kumar R, Wahed T, Anwar F. Micronutrient intake and perceived barriers among anaemic pregnant women in Aceh, Indonesia. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. (2019) 31:491–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

59. Nahrisah P, Somrongthong R, Viriyautsahakul N, Viwattanakulvanid P, Plianbangchang S. Effect of integrated pictorial handbook education and counseling on improving anemia status, knowledge, food intake, and iron tablet compliance among anemic pregnant women in Indonesia : a quasi-experimental study. J Multidiscp Healthcare. (2020) 13:43. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S213550

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. de Pee S, West CE, Muhilal, Karyadi D, Hautvast JGA. Lack of improvement in vitamin A status with increased consumption of dark-green leafy vegetables. Lancet. (1995) 346:75–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92111-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Persson V, Winkvist A, Ninuk T, Hartini S, Greiner T, Hakimi M, et al. Variability in nutrient intakes among pregnant women in Indonesia: Implications for the design of epidemiological studies using the 24-h recall method. J Nutr. (2001) 131:325–30. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.2.325

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Persson V, Hartini TNS, Greiner T, Hakimi M, Stenlund H, Winkvist A. Vitamin A intake is low among pregnant women in Central Java, Indonesia. Int J Vitamin Nutr Res. (2002) 72:124–32. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831.72.3.124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Rahmannia S, Diana A, Luftimas DE, Gurnida DA, Herawati DMD, Houghton LA, et al. Poor dietary diversity and low adequacy of micronutrient intakes among rural Indonesian lactating women from Sumedang district, West Java. PLoS ONE. (2019) 14:1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Savitri AI, Amelia D, Painter RC, Baharuddin M, Roseboom TJ, Grobbee DE, et al. Ramadan during pregnancy and birth weight of newborns. J Nutr Sci. (2018) 7:e5–e5. doi: 10.1017/jns.2017.70

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Sulchan M, Satoto S. Dietary plant food and socioeconomic determinants of vitamin A status: Study in rural lactating woman during crisis in Central Java. Med J Indones. (2006) 15:259–66. doi: 10.13181/mji.v15i4.247

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Suprapto B. Effect of low-dosage vitamin A and riboflavin on iron-folate supplementation in anaemic pregnant women. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. (2002) 11:263–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6047.2002.00310.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Sutrisna A, Knowles J, Basuni A, Menon R, Sugihantono A. Iodine intake estimation from the consumption of instant noodles, drinking water and household salt in Indonesia. Nutrients. (2018) 10:324. doi: 10.3390/nu10030324

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Tan SS, Khor GL, Stoutjesdijk E, Ng KWT, Khouw I, Bragt M, et al. Case study of temporal changes in maternal dietary intake and the association with breast milk mineral contents. J Food Compos Anal. (2020) 89:103468. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103468

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Tan ML, Chin YS, Lim PY, Ahmad Fuzi SF. Associations of obstetrical characteristics and dietary intakes with iron status among pregnant women in Selangor and Kuala Lumpur. Br Food J. (2020) 122:3115–27. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-03-2020-0275

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Wibowo N, Bardosono S, Irwinda R. Effects of Bifidobacterium animalis lactis HN019 (DR10TM), inulin, and micronutrient fortified milk on faecal DR10TM, immune markers, and maternal micronutrients among Indonesian pregnant women. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. (2016) 25:S102–10. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.122016.s2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Woon FC, Chin YS, Ismail IH, Batterham M, Abdul Latiff AH, Gan WY, et al. Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy and its associated factors among third trimester Malaysian pregnant women. PLoS ONE. (2019) 14:e0216439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Yeop NSH, Md Isa Z, Shamsuddin K, Lin KG, Abdullah Mahdy Z, Hassan H, et al. Hypocalcaemia and its contributing factors among first trimester pregnant women in an urban area in Malaysia. Nutr Food Sci. (2018) 48:165–76. doi: 10.1108/NFS-04-2017-0078

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Yong HY, Zalilah MS, Tan CW, Koo SJ. Pre-pregnancy BMI and intake of energy and calcium are associated with the vitamin D intake of pregnant Malaysian women. Fam Med Prim Care Rev. (2017) 19:417–23. doi: 10.5114/fmpcr.2017.70819

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Yusrawati S, Lipoeto NI, Machmud R. Analyses of nutrients and body mass index as risk factor for preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynecol India. (2017) 67:409–13. doi: 10.1007/s13224-017-0982-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Zaleha MI, Khadijah S, Noriklil Bukhary IB, Khor GL, Zaleha AM, Haslinda H, et al. Development and validation of a food frequency questionnaire for vitamin D intake among urban pregnant women in Malaysia. Malays J Nutr. (2015) 21:179–90.

Google Scholar

76. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. (2014) 14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

77. Shahar S, Mohamed HJBJ, Reyes F, de los Amarra MS. Adherence of Malaysian adults' energy and macronutrient intakes to national recommendations: a review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. (2018) 10:6. doi: 10.3390/nu10111584

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Wijaya-Erhardt M, Untoro J, Karyadi E, Wibowo L, Gross R. Efficacy of daily and weekly multiple micronutrient food-like tablets for the correction of iodine deficiency in Indonesian males aged 6-12 mo. Am J Clin Nutr. (2007) 85:137–43. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.1.137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Sukchan P, Liabsuetrakul T, Chongsuvivatwong V, Songwathana P, Sornsrivichai V, Kuning M. Inadequacy of nutrients intake among pregnant women in the deep south of Thailand. BMC Public Health. (2010) 10:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-572

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Nguyen CL, Van Hoang D, Nguyen PTH, Van Ha AV, Chu TK, Pham NM, et al. Low dietary intakes of essential nutrients during pregnancy in Vietnam. Nutrients. (2018) 10:1–13. doi: 10.3390/nu10081025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Jayadi YI, Dewi NU, Syahrir S. Food taboo among pregnant women and children in the Kaili tribe Palu City, Indonesia. Enferm Clín. (2020) 30:109–13. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.10.052

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Afrinis N, Verawati B, Rizqi ER, Lasepa W, Alini A, Syuryadi N. Energy intake and food restriction as determinant factors of chronic energy deficiency among pregnant women in rural area of Sungai Sembilan, Riau, Indonesia. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. (2022) 10:688–92. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2022.9042

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Ding Y, Indayati W, Basnet TB Li F, Luo H, Pan H, et al. Dietary intake in lactating mothers in China 2018: report of a survey. Nutr J. (2020) 19:72. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00589-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Shrestha V, Paudel R, Sunuwar DR, Lyman ALT, Manohar S, Amatya A. Factors associated with dietary diversity among pregnant women in the western hill region of Nepal: a community based crosssectional study. PLoS ONE. (2021) 16:e0247085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Dumrongwongsiri O, Chongviriyaphan N, Chatvutinun S, Phoonlabdacha P, Sangcakul A, Siripinyanond A, et al. Dietary intake and milk micronutrient levels in lactating women with full and partial breastfeeding. Matern Child Health J. (2021) 25:991–7. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03049-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Raymond J, Kassim N, Rose JW, Agaba M. Optimal dietary patterns designed from local foods to achieve maternal nutritional goals. BMC Public Health. (2018) 18:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5369-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Fikawati S, Syafiq A, Purbaningrum RP, Karima K. Energy consumption of lactating mothers: current situation and problems. Makara J Heal Res. (2014) 18:e4068. doi: 10.7454/msk.v18i2.4068

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Mun WC, bin Daud F, Sivaratnam LA, Selimin DS. The “irrational” taboos and “irrelevant” traditions related to postpartum women's health and well-being. Sains Malaysiana. (2019) 48:1055–64. doi: 10.17576/jsm-2019-4805-14

CrossRef Full Text

89. Li SN, Liu YH, Luo ZY, Cui YF, Cao Y, Fu WJ, et al. The association between dietary fatty acid intake and the risk of developing preeclampsia: a matched case-control study. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83674-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Akerele OA, Cheema SK. A balance of omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids is important in pregnancy. J Nutr Intermed Metab. (2016) 5:23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jnim.2016.04.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Much D, Brunner S, Vollhardt C, Schmid D, Sedlmeier EM, Brüderl M, et al. Effect of dietary intervention to reduce the n-6/n-3 fatty acid ratio on maternal and fetal fatty acid profile and its relation to offspring growth and body composition at 1 year of age. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2013) 67:282–8. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Chen LW, Tint MT, Fortier M V, Aris IM, Bernard JY, Colega M, et al. Maternal macronutrient intake during pregnancy is associated with neonatal abdominal adiposity: The growing up in Singapore towards healthy outcomes (GUSTO) study. J Nutr. (2016) 146:1571–9. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.230730

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Pee S De, Bloem MW, Tjiong R, Martini E, Gorstein J, Shrimpton R. Who has a high vitamin A intake from plant foods, but a low serum retinol concentration? Data from women in Indonesia. Eur J Clin Nutr. (1999) 53:288–97. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600724

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Apriadi Siregar P. Perilaku Ibu Nifas Dalam Mengkonsumsi Kapsul Vitamin a Di Kecamatan Kota Pinang Kabupaten Labuhanbatu Selatan. J Kesehat. (2019) 12:47–57. doi: 10.24252/kesehatan.v12i1.7934

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Buarlely MF, Naim S, Hidayah A. Faktor-faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Komsumsi Vitamin A Pada Ibu Nifas Di Puskesmas Taman Kabaupaten Sidoarjo. Literasi Kesehat Husada. (2021) 5:12–21. doi: 10.33772/pharmauho.v5i2.10168

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Sandjaja S, Ridwan E. Cakupan Suplementasi Kapsul Vitamin a Pada Ibu Masa Nifas Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Di Indonesia Analisis Data Riskesdas 2010. Bul Penelit Sist Kesehat. (2013) 15:1–10.

Google Scholar

97. Abiel T, Kaunang S, Kapantow NH, Langi FLFG, Kesehatan F, Universitas M, et al. Gambaran Asupan Vitamin Larut Air Pada Tenaga Pendidik Dan Kependidikan Fkm Unsrat Saat Pembatasan Sosial Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Kesmas. (2020) 9:78–86.

Google Scholar

98. Maadi AK, Dieny FF, Wijayanti HS, Tsani AFA, Nissa C. Asupan Zat Gizi Dan Kadar Hemoglobin Wanita Prakonsepsi Di Kabupaten Semarang. Indones J Hum Nutr. (2020) 7:139–52. doi: 10.21776/ub.ijhn.2019.006.02.2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Yong HY, Shariff ZM, Yusof BNM, Rejali Z, Tee YYS, Bindels J, et al. Pre-pregnancy BMI influences the association of dietary quality and gestational weight gain: the SECOST study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:1–12. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193735

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Caut C, Leach M, Steel A. Dietary guideline adherence during preconception and pregnancy: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. (2020) 16:1–20. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12916

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Mohd Zaki NA, Rasidi MN, Awaluddin SM, Hiong TG, Ismail H, Mohamad Nor NS. Prevalence and characteristic of dietary supplement users in Malaysia: data from the Malaysian Adult Nutrition Survey (MANS) 2014. Glob J Health Sci. (2018) 10:127. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v10n12p127

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Indonesian Ministry of Health. Total Diet Study : Individual Food Consumption Survey Indonesia (2014). Jakarta: NIHRD Publisher (2014).

103. Oktaria V, Graham SM, Triasih R, Soenarto Y, Bines JE, Ponsonby AL, et al. The prevalence and determinants of vitamin D deficiency in Indonesian infants at birth and six months of age. PLoS ONE. (2020) 15:1–15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239603

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Chee WSS, Chang CY, Arasu K, Wong SY, Ong SH, Yang WY, et al. Vitamin d status is associated with modifiable lifestyle factors in pre-adolescent children living in urban Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Nutrients. (2021) 13:2175. doi: 10.3390/nu13072175

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Quah SW, Majid HA, Al-Sadat N, Yahya A, Su TT, Jalaludin MY. Risk factors of Vitamin D deficiency among 15-year-old adolescents participating in the Malaysian health and adolescents longitudinal research team study (MyHeARTs). PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:1–17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200736

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Hussain S, Elnajeh M. Prevalence and risk factors for hypovitaminosis d among healthy adolescents in Kota Bharu, Kelantan. J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. (2020) 35:176–80. doi: 10.15605/jafes.035.02.05

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Setiati S. Vitamin D status among Indonesian elderly women living in institutionalized care units. Acta Med Indones. (2004) 40:78–83.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

108. Nimitphong H, Holick MF. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Asia Vitamin D status and sun exposure in Southeast Asia. Dermatoendocrinology. (2013) 5:34–7. doi: 10.4161/derm.24054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Spiro A, Buttriss JL. Vitamin D: an overview of vitamin D status and intake in Europe. Nutr Bull. (2014) 39:322–50. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Pilz S, März W, Cashman KD, Kiely ME, Whiting SJ, Holick MF, et al. Rationale and plan for vitamin D food fortification: a review and guidance paper. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2018) 9:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00373

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

111. Jun S, Gahche JJ, Potischman N, Dwyer JT, Guenther PM, Sauder KA, et al. Dietary supplement use and its micronutrient contribution during pregnancy and lactation in the United States Shinyoung. Obs Gynecol. (2020) 135:623–33. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003657

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Daud NAA, Mukhlef SA, Aziz FA. Awareness, attitude and behaviour related to the intake of dietary supplements among Malaysian pregnant women. Malaysian J Med Heal Sci. (2020) 16:81–8.

Google Scholar

113. Indonesia M of H. Riskesdas 2013. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia (2013).

114. Indonesia M of H. Laporan Nasional RISKESDAS 2018. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia (2018).

115. Malaysia M of H. National Health and Morbidity Survey 2015 (NHMS 2015). Vol. II: Non-Communicable Diseases, Risk Factors and Other Health Problems. Vol. 39. Dublin: Institute for Public Health (2015). p. 447–54.

116. Institute for Public Health, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia. National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2019: NCDs—Non-Communicable Diseases: Risk Factors and other Health Problems, Vol. 1. Selagnor: Institute for Public Health, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia (2019). p. 1–392. Available online at: http://www.iku.gov.my/nhms-2019 (accessed August 11, 2022).

117. Machmud PB, Hatma RD, Syafiq A. Tea consumption and iron-deficiency anemia among pregnant woman in Bogor District, Indonesia. MGMI. (2019) 10:91–100. doi: 10.22435/mgmi.v10i2.1384

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Lim K, Booth A, Szymlek-Gay EA, Gibson RS, Bailey KB, Irving D, et al. Associations between dietary iron and zinc intakes, and between biochemical iron and zinc status in women. Nutrients. (2015) 7:2983–99. doi: 10.3390/nu7042983

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Beal T, Massiot E, Arsenault JE, Smith MR, Hijmans RJ. Global trends in dietary micronutrient supplies and estimated prevalence of inadequate intakes. PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:1–20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175554

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Panburana P, Komwilaisak R, Tongprasert F, Phadungkiatwattana P, Kor-Anantakul O, Lumbiganon P. Calcium consumption during pregnancy: a multicenter study in a middle-income country in southeast Asia. Int J Womens Health. (2021) 13:31–8. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S285516

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Cormick G, Betrán AP, Romero IB, Lombardo CF, Gülmezoglu AM, Ciapponi A, et al. Global inequities in dietary calcium intake during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. (2019) 126:444–56. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15512

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Lim KK, Chan YY, Teh CH, Ismail H, Yusof R, Muhi J, et al. Iodine status among pregnant women in rural Sabah, Malaysia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. (2017) 26:861–6. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.092016.06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Kusrini I, Farebrother J, Kristanto D. Adequately iodized salt is an important strategy to prevent iodine insufficiency in pregnant women living in Central Java, Indonesia. PLoS ONE. (2020) 15:e0242575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242575

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Gebreegziabher T, Woltamo T, Thomas DG, Kennedy TS, Stoecker BJ. Iodine supplementation of lactating women and assessment of infant visual information processing and maternal and infant thyroid function: a randomized trial. PLoS ONE. (2019) 14:e0223348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223348

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Indonesia, Malaysia, pregnant women, lactating women, nutrient intake

Citation: Agustina R, Rianda D, Lasepa W, Birahmatika FS, Stajic V and Mufida R (2023) Nutrient intakes of pregnant and lactating women in Indonesia and Malaysia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Nutr. 10:1030343. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1030343

Received: 12 September 2022; Accepted: 02 January 2023;
Published: 30 March 2023.

Edited by:

Roberta Zupo, National Institute of Gastroenterology S. de Bellis Research Hospital (IRCCS), Italy

Reviewed by:

Dewi Marhaeni Diah Herawati, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia
Sara De Nucci, National Institute of Gastroenterology “Saverio de Bellis,” Research Hospital, Italy

Copyright © 2023 Agustina, Rianda, Lasepa, Birahmatika, Stajic and Mufida. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Rina Agustina, ci5hZ3VzdGluYSYjeDAwMDQwO3VpLmFjLmlk; ZHIucmluYWFndXN0aW5hJiN4MDAwNDA7Z21haWwuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.