Pre-diagnosis Dietary One-Carbon Metabolism Micronutrients Consumption and Ovarian Cancer Survival: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background and Aims: Epidemiological evidence on the relation between one-carbon metabolism (OCM) micronutrients intake and ovarian cancer (OC) survival are limited and conflicting. We evaluated the aforementioned associations in a prospective cohort-the Ovarian Cancer Follow-Up Study.

Methods: A total of 635 newly diagnosed OC patients aged 18–79 y were enrolled in the present study. Dietary intake related to one-carbon metabolism, including methionine, vitamins B2, B3, B6, B9, B12, choline, and betaine, was assessed using a validated 111-item food frequency questionnaire. Deaths were ascertained until March 31, 2021, via medical records and active follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for these aforementioned associations.

Results: During a median follow-up of 37.2 months (interquartile: 24.7–50.2 months), 114 deaths were identified. We observed an improved survival with the highest compared with the lowest tertile of dietary vitamin B6 (HR = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.32–0.84, P-trend <0.05) and choline intake (HR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.30–0.83, P-trend <0.05). No significant associations with OC survival were observed for dietary vitamins B2, B3, B9, B12, methionine, and betaine intake. We also observed a curvilinear association between vitamin B6 intake and OC survival (P non-linear <0.05).

Conclusion: Our study suggests that pre-diagnosis higher intake of vitamin B6 and choline may improve OC survival. Further clarification of these associations is warranted.

Introduction

Ovarian Cancer (OC) is one of the most common gynecologic cancers with a high mortality rate (1). In 2020, there were 3,13,959 new cases and 2,07,252 deaths of OC worldwide (2). The number of cases and deaths in China is 55,342 and 37,519 (3). Given the poor prognosis of this disease (4) and limited population-level strategies for early detection and long-term treatment success (5), knowledge of modifiable risk factors for prevention and improved prognosis is important.

During the past decades, there has been increasing epidemiological evidence of the relationship between inadequate intake of micronutrients and the appearance of tumor processes (6). The one-carbon metabolism (OCM) cycle is known to support multiple physiological processes essential for human development (7, 8), such as biosynthesis (purines and thymidine), amino acid homeostasis (glycine, serine, and methionine), epigenetic maintenance, and redox defense. Recent genomics and metabolomics approaches have also highlighted the distinctive aspects of OCM in cancer development and prognosis (9, 10). Therefore, micronutrients implicated in OCM —vitamins B2 (riboflavin), B3 (niacin), B6, B9 (folate), B12, methionine, choline, and betaine— deserve special attention.

One-carbon metabolism micronutrients are carriers or methyl-group donors (e.g., folates, choline, betaine, methionine) or cofactors of enzymes involved in the transfer reactions of these groups to DNA (namely vitamins B2, B6, and B12) (11). A dietary imbalance or deficiency in those micronutrients may disrupt DNA methylation or induce the disincorporation of nucleotide synthesis, which could lead to carcinogenesis (12–14). Although several observational studies have reported associations between individual OCM micronutrients and OC risk, the results of these studies are conflicting (14–24). For example, several case-control studies suggested null association between dietary folate intake and OC risk (15–19), whereas results from prospective studies suggested a modest inverse association (14, 20–22). Findings of methionine and vitamin B6 are also inconsistent. In the New England Case-Control Study, significant inverse associations between dietary methionine and vitamin B6 intake and OC risk were observed (23). However, the aforementioned associations were non-significant in the Nurses’ Health Study (14). Only one study previously investigated the relationship between dietary choline and betaine intake and the risk of OC and showed no association (24). Of note, recent, only two studies have investigated the relationship between individual OCM micronutrients and OC survival. For example, Dixon et al. (25) found no evidence that pre-diagnostic folate, vitamins B2, B6, and B12, methionine, betaine, or choline intake was associated with OC survival based on 1270 OC patients from Australia. However, Zhang et al. (26) observed that high folate intake was significantly associated with a lower risk of OC death based on 215 OC patients.

Notably, given these controversial results as well as the current lack of prospective evidence regarding the impact of dietary OCM micronutrients on OC survival, we present results from a prospective cohort, the Ovarian Cancer Follow-Up Study (OOPS), to clarify the associations of pre-diagnosis dietary consumption of OCM micronutrients with the survival of OC.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Participants

The ovarian cancer follow-up study (OOPS) is a prospective longitudinal cohort study of patients newly diagnosed with OC to investigate the risk and prognostic factors for cancer-related outcomes. Complete details of the study design are available elsewhere (27–30). The OOPS was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ethics Committee of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China, and informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Between 2015 and 2020, 853 OC patients with 18–75 years of age were recruited at the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. Among them, 796 women (93%) consented to participate and 744 (87%) women returned the completed study questionnaire. For quality assurance of research, we excluded OC patients for: implausible caloric intake (<500 or >3500 calories per day; n = 17), 11 (10%) or more food items blank (n = 24). In addition, considering that smoking lowers serum folate and inhibits the one-carbon response (31, 32), smokers (n = 68) were likewise excluded. Finally, a total of 635 women were eligible for the analysis. Details are shown in the flow chart of the study participants (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Flow of participants through study.

Data Collection

During the enrollment period, the participants were interviewed in-person by skilled interviewers with relevant medical knowledge. Information on socio-demographic characteristics including education, monthly household income, the levels of physical activity, cigarette smoking, medical and reproductive history, exogenous hormone use, anthropometric measures as well as alcohol consumption habits were gathered using lifestyle questionnaires as detailed elsewhere (27–30). Furthermore, clinical characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical records, including age at diagnosis, histological type (serious and non-serious), histopathologic grade (well, moderate, and poorly differentiated), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (I, II, III, IV, and unknown), residual lesions (none, <1, and ≥1 cm), and comorbidities (hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes, and so on) (yes and no).

Dietary Exposure Assessment

Pre-diagnosis dietary intake was assessed at recruitment with a 111-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), which was previously validated (27, 28). The reproducibility coefficients (Spearman correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients) were above 0.5 for most food groups, and the correlation coefficients (Spearman correlation coefficients) were between 0.3 and 0.7 for most food groups between the FFQ and weighed dietary records. During the in-person interview, newly diagnosed OC patients reported their usual frequency of consumption of each food item in the 12 months before diagnosis. The frequency of intake ranged from almost none to twice a day or more. Nutrient contents of the food items were determined through a linkage of the FFQ responses to 2018 Chinese Food Composition Tables (33). Intakes of the following OCM micronutrients from food sources were available for analysis: vitamins B2 (riboflavin), B3 (niacin), B6, B9 (folate), B12, methionine, choline, and betaine. OCM micronutrients are thought to influence disease risk by donating methyl groups for methylation reactions (7, 34), we also calculated a “methyl-donor index” as a composite measure of dietary methyl intake by standardizing the nutrient intake levels on the log-scale [(nutrient value – mean)/standard deviation] then summed across all eight micronutrients, as described previously (35, 36). Intakes of OCM micronutrients from food sources were available for analysis. Each nutrient and methyl-donor index were adjusted for total energy intake based on the residual method (37).

Cohort Follow-Up and Outcome Ascertainment

The OOPS participants were followed up until the occurrence of mortality from any cause or the last follow-up (March 31, 2021). Data on vital status were obtained by active follow-up and annual linkage to the Vital Statistics Unit in the Liaoning Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Statistical Analysis

We calculated descriptive statistics of general and dietary characteristics. The Kaplan–Meier technique was used to plot crude survival curves and estimate the crude overall survival (OS) probabilities. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived from Cox proportional hazards regression model where the entry time was the date at which the OC patients enrolled in the OOPS and the exit time was the date when the participant died or was censored due to loss to follow-up or end of study follow-up on March 31, 2021, whenever occurred first. The proportional hazards assumption was tested through including an interaction term between dietary OCM nutrients and the logarithm of time, and no violations were found (all p > 0.05). The HR and 95%CI for each tertile were calculated using the first tertile as a reference. The linear trend of the association between dietary OCM nutrients intake and OC survival was assessed by assigning the median value of each tertile and treating it as continuous in a model. Continuous intakes were also calculated by per unit increase. We calculated age at diagnosis (continuous, years) and body mass index (BMI) (continuous, kg/m2)-adjusted HRs (Model 1). Model 2 was additionally adjusted for dietary changes (yes or no), alcohol drinking status (yes or no), education (junior secondary or below, senior high school/technical secondary school, and junior college/university or above), income (<5000, 5000–10000 or >10000 RMB), physical activity (continuous, MET-hours/day), menopausal status (yes or no), parity (≤1 or ≥2), multivitamin use (yes or no), multimineral use (yes or no), red meat intake (continuous, g/day), methyl-donor index (<5.22, 5.22–8.42, ≥8.42) and total energy. Model 3 was adjusted further for comorbidities (yes or no), FIGO stage (I-II, III-IV, or unknown), histological type (serious or non-serious), histopathologic grade (well, moderate, or poorly differentiated), residual lesions (none, <1, or ≥1 cm) to minimize the impact of clinical characteristics on survival. In our study, dietary change and parity were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. A restricted cubic spline model with three knots (i.e., 10, 50, and 90th percentiles) was also performed to test for non-linear relationships (38).

Stratified analyses were conducted by alcohol drinking (no and yes), age at diagnosis (<50 and ≥50 years), menopausal status (no and yes), FIGO stage (I-II and III-IV), residual lesions (no and yes), histological type (serious and non-serious), and BMI (<24 and ≥24 kg/m). Interactions were tested by using likelihood-ratio tests.

We conducted several sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of the primary findings. First, we restricted the study sample to participants among people who had not taken vitamin supplements. Second, we mutually adjusted for all of the dietary OCM nutrients to evaluate whether the associations were independent of each other (36). In addition, the data were analyzed in quartiles and compared with recommended intake (RI). Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, United States). Two-sided P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

During the median follow-up of 37.2 months (interquartile: 24.7–50.2 months), 114 deaths from all causes were recorded among all 635 patients. Table 1 summarizes the basic characteristics of OC patients. Later-stage disease and greater residual disease were statistically significantly associated with worse survival in this cohort (Supplementary Table 1).

TABLE 1

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of ovarian cancer patients (n = 635).

Multivariable-adjusted HRs and 95%CIs for associations between dietary intakes of OCM micronutrients and OC survival are shown in Table 2. Higher dietary vitamin B6 intake was associated with lower mortality of OC (HR Tertile 3 vs. Tertile 1 = 0.52; 95%CI = 0.32–0.84; P trend <0.05). Additionally, dietary choline intake was associated with a decreased OC survival (HR Tertile 3 vs. Tertile 1 = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.30–0.83; P trend <0.05) (Supplementary Figure 1). However, we failed to observe significant associations for OC mortality with the intake of vitamins B2, B3, B9, B12, methionine, and betaine. Of note, we observed a curvilinear association between vitamin B6 intake and OC survival (P non-linear <0.05) (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure 2).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between dietary one-carbon metabolism micronutrients intake and total mortality of ovarian cancer (n = 635)*.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. HR and 95%CIs of overall survival among OC patients by vitamin B6. The association was adjusted for age at diagnosis, body mass index, total energy, alcohol drinking, diet change, education, income, physical activity, menopausal status, parity, multivitamin use, multimineral use, red meat, methyl-donor index, comorbidities, FIGO stage, histological type, histopathologic grade, and residual lesions.

No significant interactions were found in the subgroup analyses stratified by demographic and clinical characteristics (Table 3). The direction of these results was mainly consistent with the main findings but not all of them showed statistical significance. The inverse associations between vitamin B6 and choline intake and OC mortality seemed slightly stronger in patients with an age greater than 50 years, menopausal status, serious patients, and no residual lesion patients (Supplementary Tables 2–4). In addition, the inverse association between vitamin B6 intake and OC mortality was slightly stronger in OC patients with BMI ≥24, alcohol drinkers, and stage III–IV, while the protective effect of choline was stronger in those with BMI <24, non-drinkers and stage I-II patients.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Subgroup analyses for adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between dietary vitamin B₆ and choline intake and total mortality of ovarian cancer (n = 635).

In sensitivity analysis that excluded women who had taken vitamin supplements, the results were equivalent to the original analysis (Supplementary Table 5). Furthermore, the association for dietary vitamin B6 and choline intake remained significant in the most elaborate model that included all eight micronutrients (Supplementary Table 6). We have also carried out analyses in quartile comparison and the results are consistent with those of tertiles (Supplementary Table 7). Vitamin B2, B3, B9, and choline did not show an association with OC survival when grouped according to RI (Supplementary Table 8).

Discussion

The present study is one of the limited studies evaluating the role of pre-diagnosis dietary OCM nutrients in the survival of OC. This paper highlights the inverse, statistically significant relationship between pre-diagnostic dietary vitamin B6 and choline intake levels and OC survival. Null associations were observed for vitamins B2, B3, B9, B12, methionine, and betaine. Further, the relationship between vitamin B6 intake and OC survival was curvilinear.

To date, only two observational studies (25, 26) examined the association between pre-diagnosis OCM nutrients and OC survival. One study suggested null associations between OCM nutrients intake and OC survival, another study indicated that folate intake was significantly associated with a lower risk of OC death. However, our findings were partly inconsistent with both of them. Possible explanations for the discrepancy might be attributed to the different demographic and clinical characteristics of OC patients, FFQ measurements, dietary habits, sample size and follow-up periods. For example, compared with these two previous studies, we included a moderate sample size (635 vs. 1270 and 215) and had a shorter follow-up period (3.1 years vs. 10 and 4.02 years). In addition, more advanced FIGO stage III-IV (71.02% vs. 48.35%) and diagnostic age >50 (81.8% vs. 63.46%) were included in the study by Dixon et al. than us (25). Furthermore, Zhang et al. failed to adjust for key confounding factors including FIGO stage, tumor grade, and presence of residual disease (26). Dietary habits in different countries and different regions of the same country may also provide insights into these contradictions.

Our study suggested that higher intake of vitamin B6 and choline was associated with better OC survival among post-menopausal women. Our previous study suggested that pre-diagnosis cruciferous vegetables intake was only associated better survival of OC in postmenopausal patients when stratified by menopausal status (28). These results are consistent with previous studies that have shown a stronger effect of some dietary nutrients (such as alpha-carotene, h-cryptoxanthin) in reducing OC incidence in postmenopausal rather than in premenopausal women (39, 40). Studies have demonstrated that dietary nutrients intake can alter circulating levels of estrogen and other sex hormones (41). The possible mechanism might partially lie in that vitamin B6 and choline affect the ovarian synthesis of sex hormones or the alteration of other menstrual cycle characteristics (42). Vitamin B6 and choline may be effective only at low sex hormone concentrations which was shown in postmenopausal women. Further studies are recommended to assess dietary OCM nutrients intake and OC survival separately in pre- and post-menopausal women.

A protective effect of vitamin B6 on OC survival is biologically plausible given vitamin B6’s role as a cofactor for enzymes involved in the DNA synthesis and methylation pathways of OCM (43). A diet low in vitamin B6 results in a decreased production of the methyl donor, methylene-tetrahydrofolate (44) and eventually leads to chromosome breaks and thus involvement in tumor progression (45). In addition, laboratory studies have demonstrated that vitamin B6 is effective at scavenging free radicals which if not properly controlled can promote carcinogenesis (19), so vitamin B6 may influence OC through its antioxidant properties. The mean dietary intake of choline in our study was 279.17 mg/day, which is relatively lower than its recommended intake (RI = 400 mg/d). Choline is a methyl-group donor involved in OCM cycle, abnormal choline metabolism is emerging as a metabolic hallmark that is associated with oncogenesis and tumor progression (46, 47). Humans ingest approximately 50 mmol of methyl groups per day, and 60% of them are derived from choline. Animals fed diets deficient in methyl donors (choline) have hypomethylated DNA (48). These changes occur not only in global methylation, but also in the methylation of specific genes (49, 50), which can easily be influenced by changes in human diet. This proven scientific insight promises to enhance our understanding of how choline affects the prognosis of OC.

In our study, we found that the mean dietary intake of vitamin B2, B6, B9, B12, and choline was less than the Dietary Nutrient Reference Intakes for Chinese Residents. This phenomenon is also observed in several previous studies (19, 51–53). For example, the mean dietary vitamin B9 intake of OC patients were below the recommended intake (346 ug/d < RI = 400 ug/d) in a case-control study from the United States (19). A hospital-based case-control study from Hong Kong, China also showed that the mean dietary vitamin B6 (0.79 ug/d < RI = 1.6 ug/d) and B9 (207.4 ug/d < RI = 400 ug/d) intakes were relatively lower in breast cancer cases (52). However, these phenomena were not common in the general population (22, 54).

Currently little is known about the possible relation between vitamin-B12 and cancer risk. However, since vitamin-B12 has a key role in one-carbon metabolism and cells require one-carbon units for DNA synthesis, methylation as well as redox and reductive metabolism, vitamin-B12 may influence pathways enhancing the proliferation of cancer cells (55). However, we found a non-significant association between dietary vitamin B12 intake and OC survival. This might be partly attributed to the low intake of dietary vitamin B12 in OC patients (mean value is 0.14 μg/d). According to the ChineseDRIs, the value should be 2.4 ug/d. In addition, compared to several previous studies (25, 51, 53, 56), dietary vitamin B12 intake was relatively lower in our study. This difference might be attributed to the different study participants and dietary habit. Furthermore, coupled with the difficulty of accurately measuring vitamin B12 (57), this may lead to greater changes and weaken these links.

Strengths of our study include data that were prospectively collected in high-quality population-based registers, reducing bias in ascertainment of the exposure and outcomes. Another strength of this study is one of the limited studies to assess the association between pre-diagnosis OCM nutrients intake and OC survival. Also, the collection of numerous clinical and lifestyle covariates related to OC survival allowed for statistical adjustment of these factors to limit potential confounding. A reproducible and validated FFQ also enabled us to achieve a comprehensive dietary intake assessment of OCM nutrients.

Potential limitations of our study should also be considered. First, information on dietary intake and other covariates were self-reported, and therefore, non-differential misclassification of these variables resulting from recall and reporting biases was possible. However, we used a highly reproducible validated FFQ and selected highly trained and skilled researchers to collect information. Second, the current study was the single assessment of diet, which eliminated the possibility to examine dietary changes during follow-up. Whereas, we have adjusted for dietary change as a confounder. Third, because regular use of any type of supplement was rare in our cohort (<10%), we were only able to assess food sources of nutrients. Meanwhile, the finding of the sensitivity analysis in the population not taking B vitamin supplements was consistent with the main analysis. Fourth, we did not determine the internal levels of these nutrients in the body, and the relatively less precise assessment by the FFQ may have attenuated any associations. Lastly, we could not evaluate the association between OCM micronutrients and OC specific mortality because the data for the cause of death were not available. Thus, our findings should be interpreted cautiously and need to be confirmed by future studies.

In summary, this prospective cohort study demonstrated inverse associations between pre-diagnostic dietary vitamin B6 and choline and OC survival. Future large prospective cohorts should validate our findings and would improve our understanding of the role of OCM micronutrients intake in the prognosis of OC.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by The Institutional Review Board of the Ethics Committee of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

H-LX, T-TG, and Q-JW conceived the study. T-TG, Y-HZ, SG, Y-SJ, and Q-JW contributed to the design. H-LX, T-TG, SY, and SG collected the data. H-LX, F-HL, Y-FW, SY, and Q-JW cleaned the data and checked the discrepancy. H-LX, F-HL, Y-FW, and H-YC analyzed the data. H-LX, T-TG, F-HL, Y-FW, H-YC, and Q-JW interpreted the data. All authors interpreted the data, read the manuscript, and approved the final vision.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 82073647 and 81602918 to Q-JW and No. 82103914 to T-TG), LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (No. XLYC1907102 to Q-JW), and 345 Talent Project of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University (No. M0268 to Q-JW and No. M0952 to T-TG).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2022.873249/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Gaona-Luviano P, Medina-Gaona LA, Magaña-Pérez K. Epidemiology of ovarian cancer. Chin Clin Oncol. (2020) 9:47.

Google Scholar

2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Cao W, Chen HD, Yu YW, Li N, Chen WQ. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020. Chin Med J (Engl). (2021) 134:783–91. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Lheureux S, Braunstein M, Oza AM. Epithelial ovarian cancer: evolution of management in the era of precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin. (2019) 69:280–304. doi: 10.3322/caac.21559

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. L’Espérance K, Datta GD, Qureshi S, Koushik A. Vitamin D exposure and ovarian cancer risk and prognosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:1168. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041168

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Willett WC. Micronutrients and cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr. (1994) 59(Suppl. 5):1162S–5S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/59.5.1162S

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Anderson OS, Sant KE, Dolinoy DC. Nutrition and epigenetics: an interplay of dietary methyl donors, one-carbon metabolism and DNA methylation. J Nutr Biochem. (2012) 23:853–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2012.03.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ducker GS, Rabinowitz JD. One-carbon metabolism in health and disease. Cell Metab. (2017) 25:27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Locasale JW. Serine, glycine and one-carbon units: cancer metabolism in full circle. Nat Rev Cancer. (2013) 13:572–83. doi: 10.1038/nrc3557

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Amelio I, Cutruzzolá F, Antonov A, Agostini M, Melino G. Serine and glycine metabolism in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. (2014) 39:191–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.02.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Lecorguillé M, Lioret S, de Lauzon-Guillain B, de Gavelle E, Forhan A, Charles MA, et al. Association between dietary intake of one-carbon metabolism nutrients in the year before pregnancy and birth anthropometry. Nutrients. (2020) 12:838. doi: 10.3390/nu12030838

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Newman AC, Maddocks ODK. One-carbon metabolism in cancer. Br J Cancer. (2017) 116:1499–504.

Google Scholar

13. Ross SA. Diet and DNA methylation interactions in cancer prevention. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2003) 983:197–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb05974.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Tworoger SS, Hecht JL, Giovannucci E, Hankinson SE. Intake of folate and related nutrients in relation to risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol. (2006) 163:1101–11. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj128

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Bidoli E, La Vecchia C, Talamini R, Negri E, Parpinel M, Conti E, et al. Micronutrients and ovarian cancer: a case-control study in Italy. Ann Oncol. (2001) 12:1589–93. doi: 10.1023/a:1013124112542

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. McCann SE, Freudenheim JL, Marshall JR, Graham S. Risk of human ovarian cancer is related to dietary intake of selected nutrients, phytochemicals and food groups. J Nutr. (2003) 133:1937–42. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.6.1937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Pelucchi C, Mereghetti M, Talamini R, Negri E, Montella M, Ramazzotti V, et al. Dietary folate, alcohol consumption, and risk of ovarian cancer in an Italian case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2005) 14:2056–8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0192

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Salazar-Martinez E, Lazcano-Ponce EC, Gonzalez Lira-Lira G, Escudero-De los Rios P, Hernandez-Avila M. Nutritional determinants of epithelial ovarian cancer risk: a case-control study in Mexico. Oncology. (2002) 63:151–7. doi: 10.1159/000063814

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Harris HR, Cramer DW, Vitonis AF, DePari M, Terry KL. Folate, vitamin B(6), vitamin B(12), methionine and alcohol intake in relation to ovarian cancer risk. Int J Cancer. (2012) 131:E518–29. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26455

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Larsson SC, Giovannucci E, Wolk A. Dietary folate intake and incidence of ovarian cancer: the Swedish mammography cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2004) 96:396–402. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Navarro Silvera SA, Jain M, Howe GR, Miller AB, Rohan TE. Dietary folate consumption and risk of ovarian cancer: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer Prev. (2006) 15:511–5. doi: 10.1097/01.cej.0000220627.54986.bf

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Kelemen LE, Sellers TA, Vierkant RA, Harnack L, Cerhan JR. Association of folate and alcohol with risk of ovarian cancer in a prospective study of postmenopausal women. Cancer Causes Control. (2004) 15:1085–93. doi: 10.1007/s10552-004-1546-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Arthur RS, Kirsh VA, Rohan TE. Dietary B-vitamin intake and risk of breast, endometrial, ovarian and colorectal cancer among Canadians. Nutr Cancer. (2019) 71:1067–77. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1597904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kotsopoulos J, Hankinson SE, Tworoger SS. Dietary betaine and choline intake are not associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2010) 64:111–4. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Dixon SC, Ibiebele TI, Protani MM, Beesley J, deFazio A, Crandon AJ, et al. Dietary folate and related micronutrients, folate-metabolising genes, and ovarian cancer survival. Gynecol Oncol. (2014) 132:566–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Zhang L, Liu W, Hao Q, Bao L, Wang K. Folate intake and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for ovarian cancer risk. Int J Mol Sci. (2012) 13:4009–20. doi: 10.3390/ijms13044009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Jiang L, Gong TT, Gao S, Li XQ, Liu FH, Wen ZY, et al. Pre-diagnosis dairy product intake and ovarian cancer mortality: results from the ovarian cancer follow-up study (OOPS). Front Nutr. (2021) 8:750801. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.750801

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Wei YF, Hao YY, Gao S, Li XQ, Liu FH, Wen ZY, et al. Pre-diagnosis cruciferous vegetables and isothiocyanates intake and ovarian cancer survival: a prospective cohort study. Front Nutr. (2021) 8:778031. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.778031

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Wen ZY, Liu C, Liu FH, Wei YF, Xu HL, Wang R, et al. Association between pre-diagnostic dietary pattern and survival of ovarian cancer: evidence from a prospective cohort study. Clin Nutr. (2022) 41:452–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.12.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Gu JH, Gong TT, Wu QJ, Liu FH, Wen ZY, Gao C, et al. Association between pre-diagnostic dietary supplements intake and ovarian cancer survival: findings from a prospective cohort study in Chinese women. Front Nutr. (2021) 8:758178. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.758178

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Piyathilake CJ, Macaluso M, Hine RJ, Richards EW, Krumdieck CL. Local and systemic effects of cigarette smoking on folate and vitamin B-12. Am J Clin Nutr. (1994) 60:559–66. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/60.4.559

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Mannino DM, Mulinare J, Ford ES, Schwartz J. Tobacco smoke exposure and decreased serum and red blood cell folate levels: data from the third national health and nutrition examination survey. Nicotine Tob Res. (2003) 5:357–62. doi: 10.1080/1462220031000094330

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Yang Y, Wang G, He M, Pan C, Wang Z. China Food Composition (Standard Edition). Beijing: Peking University Medical Press (2018).

Google Scholar

34. Mahmoud AM, Ali MM. Methyl donor micronutrients that modify DNA methylation and cancer outcome. Nutrients. (2019) 11:608. doi: 10.3390/nu11030608

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Chamberlain JA, Dugué PA, Bassett JK, Hodge AM, Brinkman MT, Joo JE, et al. Dietary intake of one-carbon metabolism nutrients and DNA methylation in peripheral blood. Am J Clin Nutr. (2018) 108:611–21. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Antwi SO, Petrick JL, Campbell PT, Norez DA, Stevens VL, Liao LM, et al. One-carbon metabolism-related micronutrients intake and risk for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective cohort study. Int J Cancer. (2020) 147:2075–90. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Willett W, Stampfer MJ. Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses. Am J Epidemiol. (1986) 124:17–27. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114366

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Desquilbet L, Mariotti F. Dose-response analyses using restricted cubic spline functions in public health research. Stat Med. (2010) 29:1037–57. doi: 10.1002/sim.3841

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Tung KH, Wilkens LR, Wu AH, McDuffie K, Hankin JH, Nomura AM, et al. Association of dietary vitamin A, carotenoids, and other antioxidants with the risk of ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2005) 14:669–76. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0550

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Cramer DW, Kuper H, Harlow BL, Titus-Ernstoff L. Carotenoids, antioxidants and ovarian cancer risk in pre- and postmenopausal women. Int J Cancer. (2001) 94:128–34. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Dunneram Y, Greenwood DC, Cade JE. Diet, menopause and the risk of ovarian, endometrial and breast cancer. Proc Nutr Soc. (2019) 78:438–48. doi: 10.1017/S0029665118002884

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Hui C, Qi X, Qianyong Z, Xiaoli P, Jundong Z, Mantian M. Flavonoids, flavonoid subclasses and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. PLoS One. (2013) 8:e54318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054318

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Christman JK, Sheikhnejad G, Dizik M, Abileah S, Wainfan E. Reversibility of changes in nucleic acid methylation and gene expression induced in rat liver by severe dietary methyl deficiency. Carcinogenesis. (1993) 14:551–7. doi: 10.1093/carcin/14.4.551

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Ames BN. DNA damage from micronutrient deficiencies is likely to be a major cause of cancer. Mutat Res. (2001) 475:7–20. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00070-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Huang JY, Butler LM, Wang R, Jin A, Koh WP, Yuan JM. Dietary intake of one-carbon metabolism-related nutrients and pancreatic cancer risk: the Singapore Chinese health study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2016) 25:417–24. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0594

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Onono FO, Morris AJ. Phospholipase D and choline metabolism. Handb Exp Pharmacol. (2020) 259:205–18. doi: 10.1007/164_2019_320

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Aboagye EO, Bhujwalla ZM. Malignant transformation alters membrane choline phospholipid metabolism of human mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res. (1999) 59:80–4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

48. Locker J, Reddy TV, Lombardi BDNA. methylation and hepatocarcinogenesis in rats fed a choline-devoid diet. Carcinogenesis. (1986) 7:1309–12. doi: 10.1093/carcin/7.8.1309

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Wilson MJ, Shivapurkar N, Poirier LA. Hypomethylation of hepatic nuclear DNA in rats fed with a carcinogenic methyl-deficient diet. Biochem J. (1984) 218:987–90. doi: 10.1042/bj2180987

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Niculescu MD, Zeisel SH. Diet, methyl donors and DNA methylation: interactions between dietary folate, methionine and choline. J Nutr. (2002) 132(Suppl. 8):2333S–5S. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.8.2333S

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Zeng FF, Liu YT, Lin XL, et al. Folate, vitamin B6, vitamin B12 and methionine intakes and risk for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Chinese adults: a matched case-control study. Br J Nutr. (2016) 115:121–8. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515004146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Zhang CX, Ho SC, Chen YM, Lin FY, Fu JH, Cheng SZ. Dietary folate, vitamin B6, vitamin B12 and methionine intake and the risk of breast cancer by oestrogen and progesterone receptor status. Br J Nutr. (2011) 106:936–43. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511001140

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Kasperzyk JL, Fall K, Mucci LA, Fan YY, Zhang XL, Xu CH, et al. One-carbon metabolism-related nutrients and prostate cancer survival. Am J Clin Nutr. (2009) 90:561–9. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27645

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Shrubsole MJ, Yang G, Gao YT, Chow WH, Shu XO, Cai Q, et al. Dietary B vitamin and methionine intakes and plasma folate are not associated with colorectal cancer risk in Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2009) 18:1003–6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1200

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Oliai Araghi S, Kiefte-de Jong JC, van Dijk SC, Swart KMA, van Laarhoven HW, van Schoor NM, et al. Folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation and the risk of cancer: long-term follow-up of the B vitamins for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures (B-PROOF) trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2019) 28:275–82. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-1198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Adeloye AO. Synthesis, photophysical and electrochemical properties of a mixed bipyridyl-phenanthrolyl ligand Ru(II) heteroleptic complex having trans-2-methyl-2-butenoic acid functionalities. Molecules. (2011) 16:8353–67. doi: 10.3390/molecules16108353

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Beaton GH. Approaches to analysis of dietary data: relationship between planned analyses and choice of methodology. Am J Clin Nutr. (1994) 59(Suppl. 1):253S–61S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/59.1.253S

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar