Antonio Morata1*
Buenaventura Guamis2*- 1enotecUPM, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- 2Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Ultra-high pressure homogenization (UHPH) is a high pressure technique in which a fluid is pressurized by pumping at higher than 200 MPa and instantaneously depressurized at atmospheric pressure across a special valve. The full process takes <0.2 s and the in-valve time is <0.02 s. In the valve, extremely intense impacts and shear forces produce the nanofragmentation of biological tissue at a range of 100–300 nm. The antimicrobial effect is highly effective, reaching easily inactivation levels higher than 6-log cycles even at low in-valve temperatures. At in-valve temperatures of 140–150°C (0.02 s) the destruction of thermoresistant spores is possible. Even when the temperature in-valve can be elevated (70–150°C), it can be considered a gentle technology because of the tremendously short processing time. It is easy to get outlet temperatures after valve of 20–25°C by the expansion and assisted by heat exchangers. Thermal markers as hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) are not formed, nor are deleterious effects observed in sensitive compounds as terpenes or anthocyanins, probably because of the low effect in covalent bonds of small molecules of the high-pressure techniques compared with thermal technologies. Additionally, intense inactivation of oxidative enzymes is observed, therefore protecting the sensory and nutritional quality of fruit juices and avoiding or reducing the use of antioxidants as sulphites. UHPH can be consider a powerful and highly effective continuous and sterilizing technology without thermal repercussions, able to keep fresh juices with most of their initial sensory and nutritional quality and allowing high-quality and natural fermented derivatives as wine.
Introduction
Currently there are available at commercial and industrial levels two groups of high pressure technologies: (i) discontinuous high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) and (ii) continuous high pressure homogenization including high pressure homogenization (HPH), microfluidization (MF), and ultrahigh pressure homogenization (UHPH). The first group (i) uses a fluid, usually water, as pressurizing media, and the antimicrobial effect is produced by the damage produced in membranes and cell walls by the intense pressures ranging from 400 to 600 MPa, during 3–10 min (1, 2). It is possible to process solid and liquid foods. This technology is discontinuous on batch-mode and unable to inactivate spores (3) and with low effect in enzymes (4, 5). However, it is highly protective with molecules with nutritional or sensory impact, e.g., vitamins, aroma compounds, and pigments. The second group (ii) are continuous technologies in which the liquid is pumped at high pressure. In UHPH, which is the most effective, pressure ranges from 200 to 600 MPa (Figure 1). The antimicrobial effect is produced by the intense impact and shear forces produced in the valve (2, 6, 7). Liquid suffers strong acceleration when pumped at 300 MPa, reaching Mach 2 speed and extremely intense deceleration to almost zero when crossing the valve during <0.02 s. The effect is a full nanofragmentation to a submicro size range of 100–300 nm of whatever biological structure: cells, tissues, and biomolecules including enzymes (8). Depending on in-valve temperature (140°C), even spores are destroyed. UHPH sterilization is an alternative technique to UHT but with lower sensory and nutritional impact.
Figure 1. Range of pressures in conventional homogenization vs. UHPH. Effect on enzymes and microorganisms and nano-fragmentation in the UHPH valve.
The objective of this review is to explain the main features of the processing by UHPH and its advantages compared with the conventional hydrostatic pressurization (HHP). Additionally, it described the impact of UHPH in sensory and nutritional quality and the reduction of conflictive additives as sulphites.
Performance of Continuous UHPH vs. HHP
UHPH is a powerful technique that can be applied in continuous mode to whatever fluid with a size particle lower than 0.5 mm and a viscosity below 2,000 centipoises (9), and therefore can be used in most food fluids. Currently UHPH technologies can be found at the commercial level; one of the most evolved is patented by UAB and exploded by Ypsicon Advances Technologies (10). Liquids are pumped usually at 300 MPa, which can be considered the limit between HPH and UHPH (11), and the antimicrobial effect and enzyme destruction is produced in a special valve (7, 12) produced with special strong materials as tungsten carbide (weaker) or artificial diamond (highly resistant). The homogenizing valve has a few μm in width favoring mechanical interactions with microbial cells (11, 13). In-valve the intense impact and shear efforts produce several effects at nano-scale: nano-fragmentation, nano-covering, nano-encapsulation, and nano-emulsion that can be modulated to produce sterile or pasteurized foods (2, 7, 8, 14, 15), to increase the accessibility of nutrients and health-promoting compounds (16) and to develop innovative foods with improved colloidal structure or novel properties.
Pressure range in UHPH is 200–600 MPa; however, at 300 MPa the microbial and enzyme inactivation is more intense. Pressure higher than 300 MPa does not produce more intense effects but sometimes increases the level of wearing in-valve and other components. Concerning the temperature, most of the applications can be done at pasteurization or lower temperatures (<70°C). This includes enzyme inactivation, microbial destruction, nano-emulsion, and nano-covering (7, 8, 14, 17).
Concerning microbial inactivation at low pasteurization temperatures (<70°C) or even at room temperature, but considering the shorter processing times of UHPH (0.02 s in-valve and around 0.2 s of total process), it is possible to eliminate vegetative cells of fungi, yeast, and bacteria at populations of 6-log CFU/mL or higher (8, 14). The short in-valve time at this temperature guarantees the absence of thermal markers as hydroymethylfurfural (HMF) (8).
The elimination of bacterial endospores requires higher temperature 140–150°C (7, 18); however, thermal effect is very soft considering the short processing time that is lower than 0.2 s for the full process (14). This allows a higher sensory quality than traditional UHT.
The main features of UHPH in comparison with HHP concern the processing mode, effects on food components, antimicrobial capacity, impact in nutritional and sensory properties, and evaluation of thermal degradation as shown in Table 1. UHPH shows some advantages concerning gentle impact in food quality with a more effective antimicrobial and anti-enzymatic performance.
Table 1. Comparative features of UHPH and HHP.
Elimination of Spoilage Microorganisms in Must and Wines and Improved Application of New Biotechnologies
Spoilage yeasts that can be present in grapes, such as Brettanomyces, are easily destroyed by UHPH processing (14). Lactic or acetic undesired bacteria that can develop in the future wine increasing volatile acidity, or forming biogenic amines or ethyl carbamate, will be eliminated from the grape must using UHPH, ensuring a healthier wine. The use of 300 MPa and temperatures of 60–100°C for 0.2 s eliminate vegetative bacterial cells (8, 14). Sporulated forms need higher temperatures (6, 7, 18). Toxins as patulin were not directly affected by UHPH; however, a significant decrease can be observed in UHPH juices during storage (18).
There is facilitation of new biotechnologies as use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts and yeast-bacteria co-inoculations by a better implantation of the starters in absence of indigenous competitive microorganism (14, 23).
Destruction of Oxidative Enzymes (PPO) and Retention of Antioxidant Capacity in Juices
HPH can be used to modulate enzymatic activity (42), but at higher pressure using UHPH the enzymes can be denatured. UHPH processing is able to disrupt quaternary structure of proteins (43). The intense inactivation of oxidative enzymes such as polyphenol oxidase (PPO), usually higher than 90% (14, 18), produces wines with antioxidant capacities increased more than 150% regarding controls (8, 14). Preserved antioxidant capacity has also been observed in apple or strawberry juices (30, 44). Moreover, the stability of vitamin C in HPH and UHPH treatments has been confirmed (30, 45). Additionally, UHPH grape must can be exposed to air with high exchange surfaces (>1 cm2/mL) without experimenting oxidations or browning processes during several days. The inactivation of pectinmethylesterase has been also observed in apple juices as what contributes to the colloidal stability of turbid juices (18).
The impact of UHPH in the wine industry is the potential reduction of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in wines, opening the possibility to produce wines with 0 mg/L of sulphites by inactivating oxidative enzymes but also destroying spoilage microorganisms (8, 14). For juices both the antimicrobial and antienzyme effect facilitate the production of low processed juices that can keep their sensory profile in absence of antimicrobials and antioxidative chemical products for long periods from months to years. The production of SO2 free red wine was studied using discontinuous processing by HHP obtaining a good sensory quality (46). However, recently, it has been reported that it is necessary to have at least 60 mg/L of SO2 to preserve quality in red wines processed at 350 MPa during 10 min at 8°C (47). Wines with less of 60 mg/L were found both less aromatic and with lower contents of anthocyanins.
Sensory and Nutritional Quality
Concerning sensory and nutritional quality, the short thermal effect produced by the in-valve temperature is not affecting the degradation of aroma compound as terpenes (8) or delicate pigments as anthocyanins (25, 48). Vitamin contents remain unaffected. Vitamin C contents remain unaffected after UHPH processing in apple juices (18). Thermal markers as HMF are not detected after the UHPH processing (8, 14).
It has been observed that delicate aroma compounds as several terpenes from a Muscat juice are not affected by UHPH treatments at 300 MPa, 65°C, processing time lower than 0.2 s. Concentrations of linalool, terpinen-4-ol, epoxylinalool, β-citronellol, geraniol, α-terpineol, cis-linalool oxide did not show significant differences with the unprocessed controls (8). Also, differences were not found in the pool of polyoxygenated terpenes. Additionally, the sensory panel also did not detect significant differences in the aromatic varietal profile.
Extraction of phenolic compounds can be improved significantly when juices with pulps or skin fragments are processed by UHPH. The intense nanofragmentation of colloids that are reduced to a size range of 100–300 nm increase the extraction of flavonoids and phenols from solids (18).
The color of white musts is improved by the intense inactivation of oxidative enzymes, making it possible to produce clear and pale juices from white grape varieties (8). Furthermore, the color remains pale even after several days of intense exposure to air.
The intense nano-fragmentation on grape cell walls produces a release of nitrogen compounds that increase the yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) available with positive effects in yeast nutrition during fermentation but also affecting the formation of fermentative fruity and floral esters (14).
In vegetal beverages of soya and almond processed by UHPH, there have been observed a better protein digestibility and a lower allergenicity (36). The effect is probably due to denaturation of the protein structure. Contents of lysine were stable after the treatment.
Highlight of Future Directions
The inactivation of spores at lower temperatures can be optimized probably by a new design of special valves built with new materials increasing the impact and shear forces. New geometries of valves increase the mechanical effects, promoting fluid jet impact, cavitation, and extreme shear efforts. Emerging materials also can help to improve the possibilities of processing abrasive foods as high fiber or high viscosity juices and smoothies. The conventional tungsten carbide alloy used in the valves must be substituted by ceramic coverings or artificial diamond seats and needles. There must be better knowledge of the nanoscale processes, and how to manage and monitor the nano-covering, nano-encapsulation, and nano-emulsion processes. The co-injection of different fluids at ultrahigh pressure promotes the formation of interactions among proteins, polysaccharides, and lipids creating nano-structures able to content and to increase the bioavailability of nutraceutical compounds. Using UHPH, it is possible to produce functional foods by the nanoencapsulation and stabilization of nutritional or sensory compounds. Frequently, these nano-encapsulates are more stable in solution or colloidal dispersion creating food fluids with same appearance in the long term without coalescence phenomena. Development of high throughput UHPH machines able to process more than 10,000 L/h is another key parameter to reach industrial scale-up. Currently, there are industrial UHPH devices able to process at 10,000 L/h working at 300 MPa, just with a single pump, but it is necessary to have several pumps to increase this processing flow. There must be development of truck portable UHPH devices to rent the processing technology to be used in seasonal food industries. The elimination of chemical preservatives as SO2, sorbates, benzoates, and others can help to reach a key objective in the food industry: cleaning labels.
Author Contributions
AM: conceptualization, writing draft, revision. BG: writing, supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades project RTI2018-096626-B-I00.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Morata A, Loira I, Vejarano R, Bañuelos MA, Sanz PD, Otero L, et al. Grape processing by high hydrostatic pressure: effect on microbial populations, phenol extraction and wine quality. Food Bioprocess Tech. (2015) 8:277–86. doi: 10.1007/s11947-014-1405-8
2. Morata A, Loira I, Vejarano R, González C, Callejo MJ, Suárez-Lepe JA. Emerging preservation technologies in grapes for winemaking. Trends Food Sci Tech. (2017) 67:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.06.014
3. Sarker MR, Akhtar S, Torres JA, Paredes-Sabja D. High hydrostatic pressure-induced inactivation of bacterial spores. Crit Rev Microbiol. (2015) 41:18–26. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2013.788475
4. Cao X, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Wang Y, Yi J, Liao X. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on enzymes, phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, polymeric color and color of strawberry pulps. J Sci Food Agric. (2011) 91:877–85. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4260
5. Chakraborty S, Kaushik N, Rao PS, Mishra HN. High-Pressure inactivation of enzymes: a review on its recent applications on fruit purees and juices. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf . (2014) 13:578–96. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12071
6. Dumay E, Chevalier-Lucia D, Picart-Palmade L, Benzaria A, Gràcia-Julià A, Blayo C. Technological aspects and potential applications of (ultra) high-pressure homogenization. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2013) 31:13–26. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2012.03.005
7. Zamora A, Guamis B. Opportunities for ultra-high-pressure homogenization (UHPH) for the food industry. Food Eng Rev. (2015) 7:130–42. doi: 10.1007/s12393-014-9097-4
8. Bañuelos MA, Loira I, Guamis B, Escott C, Del Fresno JM, Codina-Torrella I, et al. White wine processing by UHPH without SO2. Elimination of microbial populations and effect in oxidative enzymes, colloidal stability and sensory quality. Food Chem. (2020) 332:127417. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127417
9. Ypsicon. Ultra High Pressure Homogenization/Sterilization. (2018). Retrieved from: www.ypsicon.com (accessed July 2020).
10. Guamis-Lopez B, Trujillo-Mesa AJ, Ferragut-Pérez V, Quevedo-Terré JM, Lopez-Pedemonte T, Buffa-Dunat MN. Continuous System and Procedure of Sterilization and Physical Stabilization of Pumpable Fluids Bymeans of Ultrahigh Pressure Homogenization. EP2409583. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (2012).
11. Sevenich R, Mathys A. Continuous versus discontinuous ultra-high-pressure systems for food sterilization with focus on ultra-high-pressure homogenization and high-pressure thermal sterilization: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf . (2018) 17:646–62. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12348
12. Patrignani F, Lanciotti R. Applications of high and ultra high pressure homogenization for food safety. Front Microbiol. (2016) 7:1132. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01132
13. Balasubramaniam V, Martínez-Monteagudo SI, Gupta R. Principles and application of high pressure-based technologies in the food industry. Ann Rev Food Sci Technol. (2015) 6:435–62. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-022814-015539
14. Loira I, Morata A, Bañuelos MA, Puig-Pujol A, Guamis B, González C, et al. Use of ultra-high pressure homogenization processing in winemaking: control of microbial populations in grape musts and effects in sensory quality. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2018) 50:50–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.10.005
15. Comuzzo P, Calligaris S. Potential applications of high pressure homogenization in winemaking: a review. Beverages. (2019) 5:56. doi: 10.3390/beverages5030056
16. Levy R, Okun Z, Shpigelman A. High-pressure homogenization: principles and applications beyond microbial inactivation. Food Eng Rev. (2020). doi: 10.1007/s12393-020-09239-8
17. Velázquez-Estrada RM, Hernández-Herrero MM, Guamis-López B, Roig-Sagués AX. Impact of ultra-high pressure homogenization on pectin methylesterase activity and microbial characteristics of orange juice: a comparative study against conventional heat pasteurization. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2012) 13:100–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2011.09.001
18. Suárez-Jacobo Á, Saldo J, Rüfer CE, Guamis B, Roig-Sagués AX, Gervilla R. Aseptically packaged UHPH-treated apple juice: Safety and quality parameters during storage. J Food Eng. (2012) 109:291–300. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.09.007
19. Cheftel JC. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on food constituents: an overview. In: Balny C, Hayashi R, Heremans K, Masson P, editors. High Pressure and Biotechnology. Colloque INSERM. Montrouge: John Libbey Eurotext Ltd. (1992). p. 195–209.
20. Delfini C, Conterno L, Carpi G, Rovere P, Tabusso A, Cocito C, et al. Microbiological stabilisation of grape musts and wines by high hydrostatic pressures. J Wine Res. (1995) 6:143–51. doi: 10.1080/09571269508718031
21. Maresca P, Donsì F, Ferrari G. Application of a multi-pass high-pressure homogenization treatment for the pasteurization of fruit juices. J Food Eng. (2011) 104:364–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.12.030
22. Buzrul S. High hydrostatic pressure treatment of beer and wine: a review. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2012) 13:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2011.10.001
23. Bañuelos MA, Loira I, Escott C, Del Fresno J M, Morata A, Sanz PD, et al. Grape processing by high hydrostatic pressure: effect on use of non-Saccharomyces in must fermentation. Food Bioprocess Technol. (2016) 9:1769–78. doi: 10.1007/s11947-016-1760-8
24. Smelt JPPM. Recent advances in the microbiology of high pressure processing. Trends Food Sci Technol. (1998) 9:152–8.
25. Marszałek K, Wozniak Ł, Kruszewski B, Skapska S. The effect of high pressure techniques on the stability of anthocyanins in fruit and vegetables. Int J Mol Sci. (2017) 18:277. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020277
26. Cheftel JC. High-pressure, microbial inactivation and food preservation. Food Sci Technol Int. (1995) 1:75–90. doi: 10.1177/108201329500100203
27. Onür I, Misra NN, Barba FJ, Putnik P, Lorenzo JM, Gokmen V, et al. Effects of ultrasound and high pressure on physicochemical properties and HMF formation in Turkish honey types. J Food Eng. (2018) 219:129–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.09.019
28. Corrales M, Butz P, Tauscher B. Anthocyanin condensation reactions under high hydrostatic pressure. Food Chem. (2008) 110:627–35. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.02.055
29. Varela-Santos E, Ochoa-Martinez A, Tabilo-Munizaga G, Reyes JE, Pérez-Won M, Briones-Labarca V, et al. Effect of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) processing on physicochemical properties, bioactive compounds and shelf-life of pomegranate juice. Innov Food Sci Emerg. (2012) 13:13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2011.10.009
30. Suarez-Jacobo A, Rüfer C, Gervilla R, Guamis B, Roig-Sagués A, Saldo J. Influence of ultra-high pressure homogenisation on antioxidant capacity, polyphenol and vitamin content of clear apple juice. Food Chem. (2011) 127:447–54. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.12.152
31. Sancho F, Lambert Y, Demazeau G, Largeteau A, Bouvier J-M, Narbonne J-F. Effect of ultra-high hydrostatic pressure on hydrosoluble vitamins. J Food Eng. (1999) 39:247–53. doi: 10.1016/S0260-8774(98)00143-5
32. Bermejo-Prada A, Vega E, Pérez-Mateos M, Otero L. Effect of hyperbaric storage at room temperature on the volatile profile of strawberry juice. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. (2015) 62:906–14. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.08.020
33. Briones-Labarca V, Perez-Wom M, Habib G, Giovagnoli-Vicuña C, Cañas-Sarazua R, Tabilo-Munizaga G, et al. oenological and quality characteristic on young white wines (Sauvignon Blanc): effects of high hydrostatic pressure processing. J Food Qual. (2017) 2017:8524073. doi: 10.1155/2017/8524073
34. Tao Y, Sun D-W, Górecki A, Błaszczak W, Lamparski G, Amarowicz R, et al. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure processing on the physicochemical and sensorial properties of a red wine. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2012) 16:409–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2012.09.005
35. Mok C, Sonk K-T, Park Y-S, Lim S, Ruan R, Chen P. High hydrostatic pressure pasteurization of red wine. J Food Sci. (2006) 71:265–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00145.x
36. Ferragut V, Hernández-Herrero M, Veciana-Nogués MT, Borras-Suarez M, González-Linares J, Vidal-Carou MC, et al. Ultra-high-pressure homogenization (UHPH) system for producing high-quality vegetable-based beverages: physicochemical, microbiological, nutritional and toxicological characteristics. J Food Sci Agric. (2015) 95:953–61. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6769
37. Vilela RM, Lands LC, Chan HM, Azadi B, Kubow S. High hydrostatic pressure enhances whey protein digestibility to generate whey peptides that improve glutathione status in CFTR-deficient lung epithelial cells. Mol Nutr Food Res. (2006) 50:1013–29. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200600074
38. Li H, Zhu K, Zhou H, Peng W. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure treatment on allergenicity and structural properties of soybean protein isolate for infant formula. Food Chem. (2012) 132:808–14. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.11.040
39. Briviba K, Gräf V, Walz E, Guamis B, Butz P. Ultra high pressure homogenization of almond milk: physico-chemical and physiological effects. Food Chem. (2016) 192:82–9. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.06.063
40. Tabilo-Munizaga G, Gordon TA, Villalobos-Carvajal R, Moreno-Osorio L, Salazar FN, Pérez-Won M, et al. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) on the protein structure and thermal stability of Sauvignon blanc wine. Food Chem. (2014) 155:214–20. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.01.051
41. Patrignani F, Mannozzi C, Tappi S, Tylewicz U, Pasini F, Castellone V, et al. (Ultra) High pressure homogenization potential on the shelf-life and functionality of kiwifruit juice. Front Microbiol. (2019) 10:246. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00246
42. Gonçalves dos Santos Aguilar J, Cristianini M, Harumi Sato H, Modification of enzymes by use of high-pressure homogenization. Food Res Int. (2018) 109:120–5. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.011
43. Harte F. Food processing by high-pressure homogenization. In: Balasubramaniam VM, Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Lelieveld HLM, editors. High Pressure Processing of Food Principles, Technology and Applications. 1st ed. New York, NY: Springer (2016). p. 123–41.
44. Karacam CH, Sahin S, Oztop MH. Effect of High Pressure Homogenization (microfluidization) on the quality of Ottoman Strawberry (F. ananassa) juice. LWT-Food Sci Technol. (2015) 64:932–7. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.06.064
45. Sharabi S, Okun Z, Shpigelman A. Changes in the shelf life stability of riboflavin, vitamin C and antioxidant properties of milk after (Ultra) High Pressure Homogenization: direct and indirect effects. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2018) 47:161–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.02.014
46. Santos MC, Nunes C, Cappelle J, Gonçalves FJ, Rodrigues A, Saraiva JA, et al. Effect of high pressure treatments on the physicochemical properties of a sulphur dioxide-free red wine. Food Chem. (2013) 141:2558–66. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.022
47. Christofi S, Malliaris D, Katsaros G, Panagou E, Kallithraka S. Limit SO2 content of wines by applying High Hydrostatic Pressure. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2020) 62:102342. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102342
Keywords: emerging technologies, grape must, winemaking, oxidative enzymes, colloidal stability, additives, sulphites
Citation: Morata A and Guamis B (2020) Use of UHPH to Obtain Juices With Better Nutritional Quality and Healthier Wines With Low Levels of SO2. Front. Nutr. 7:598286. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.598286
Received: 24 August 2020; Accepted: 13 October 2020;
Published: 04 December 2020.
Edited by:
Eduardo Dellacassa, Universidad de la República, UruguayReviewed by:
Otniel Freitas-Silva, Embrapa Food Agroindustry, BrazilLiliana Gonçalves Fidalgo, Instituto Politécnico de Beja, Portugal
Copyright © 2020 Morata and Guamis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Antonio Morata, YW50b25pby5tb3JhdGEmI3gwMDA0MDt1cG0uZXM=; Buenaventura Guamis, QnVlbmF2ZW50dXJhLkd1YW1pcyYjeDAwMDQwO3VhYi5jYXQ=