Skip to main content

TECHNOLOGY AND CODE article

Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Brain Imaging Methods
Volume 18 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1510175

Application of MRI image segmentation algorithm for brain tumors based on improved YOLO

Provisionally accepted
Tao Yang Tao Yang 1Xueqi Lu Xueqi Lu 2Lanlan Yang Lanlan Yang 1*Miyang Yang Miyang Yang 1Jinghui Chen Jinghui Chen 1*Hongjia Zhao Hongjia Zhao 3*
  • 1 Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China
  • 2 Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • 3 Fujian Provincial People's Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective To assist in the rapid clinical identification of brain tumor types while achieving segmentation detection, this study investigates the feasibility of applying the deep learning YOLOv5s algorithm model to the segmentation of brain tumor magnetic resonance images and optimizes and upgrades it on this basis. Methods The research institute utilized two public datasets of meningioma and glioma magnetic resonance imaging from Kaggle. Dataset 1 contains a total of 3,223 images, and Dataset 2 contains 216 images. From Dataset 1, we randomly selected 3,000 images and used the Labelimg tool to annotate the cancerous regions within the images. These images were then divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. The remaining 223 images, along with Dataset 2, were ultimately used as the internal test set and external test set, respectively, to evaluate the model's segmentation effect. A series of optimizations were made to the original YOLOv5 algorithm, introducing the Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP), Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM), Coordinate Attention (CA) for structural improvement, resulting in several optimized versions, namely YOLOv5s-ASPP, YOLOv5s-CBAM, YOLOv5s-CA, YOLOv5s-ASPP-CBAM, and YOLOv5s-ASPP-CA. The training and validation sets were input into the original YOLOv5s model, five optimized models, and the YOLOv8s model for 100 rounds of iterative training. The best weight file of the model with the best evaluation index in the six trained models was used for the final test of the test set.After iterative training, the seven models can segment and recognize brain tumor magnetic resonance images. Their precision rates on the validation set are 92.5%, 93.5%, 91.2%, 91.8%, 89.6%, 90.8%, and 93.1%, respectively. The corresponding recall rates are 84%, 85.3%, 85.4%, 84.7%, 87.3%, 85.4%, and 91.9%. The best weight file of the model with the best evaluation index among the six trained models was tested on the test set, and the improved model significantly enhanced the image segmentation ability compared to the original model.Compared with the original YOLOv5s model, among the five improved models, the improved YOLOv5s-ASPP model significantly enhanced the segmentation ability of brain tumor magnetic resonance images, which is helpful in assisting clinical diagnosis and treatment planning.

    Keywords: artificial intelligence, image segmentation, brain tumor, Magnetic resonance, YOLOv5S

    Received: 15 Oct 2024; Accepted: 18 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Yang, Lu, Yang, Yang, Chen and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Lanlan Yang, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China
    Jinghui Chen, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China
    Hongjia Zhao, Fujian Provincial People's Hospital, Fuzhou, 350004, Fujian Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.