This article is a correction to:
Reduced Hedonic Valuation of Rewards and Unaffected Cognitive Regulation in Chronic Stress
Sónia Ferreira1,2†
Carlos Veiga1,2†
Pedro Moreira1,2
Ricardo Magalhães1,2
Ana Coelho1,2
Paulo Marques1,2
Carlos Portugal-Nunes1,2
Nuno Sousa1,2,3
Pedro Morgado1,2,3*- 1Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- 2ICVS/3B's – PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
- 3Clinical Academic Center – Braga, Braga, Portugal
A Corrigendum on
Reduced Hedonic Valuation of Rewards and Unaffected Cognitive Regulation in Chronic Stress
by Ferreira, S., Veiga, C., Moreira, P., Magalhães, R., Coelho, A., Marques, P., et al. (2019). Front. Neurosci. 13:724. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00724
In the original article, there was an error. The psychometric scale used to measure the depression scores was the “Beck Depression Inventory” and not the “Beck Depression Inventory II.”
A correction has been made to the Materials and Methods, subsection Sociodemographic and Psychological Scales:
“Subjects filled a questionnaire to characterize gender, age, educational level, handedness, and ethnic origin. Weight and height were also measured to prevent the inclusion of participants with an unhealthy body mass index. Subjects were assessed with the 10-items Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) (Cohen et al., 1983; Morgado et al., 2013), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) (Beck et al., 1988), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (Beck et al., 1996). PSS-10 measures the extent to which participants perceived their life as unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded during the previous month. The higher the score, the greater the intensity of perceived stress. BAI measures the severity of an individual's anxiety during the previous week. Scores lower than 8 indicate minimal anxiety. Scores higher than 7, 15, and 25 indicate mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively. BDI measures the severity of depression and can be used as a screening tool. Scores lower than 14 indicate minimal depression. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.”
A correction has also been made to Results, subsection Psychological Assessment:
“The stress group revealed higher levels of perceived stress (mean ± standard deviation 15.07 ± 5.23) than the control group (8.64 ± 5.27) as assessed by PSS-10 [t(27) = 3.30, p = 0.003, effect size d = 1.27]. No statistically significant differences were found for BAI (U = 117.50, p = 0.591) and BDI (U = 134.00, p = 0.217) between groups.”
Lastly, a correction has been made to the Abbreviations section:
“ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; dlPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; fMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging; GLM, general linear model; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; PSS-10, 10-items Perceived Stress Scale; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
References
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., and Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 56, 893–897. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Ball, R., and Ranieri, W. (1996). Comparison of beck depression inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J. Pers. Assess. 67, 588–597. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., and Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 24:385. doi: 10.2307/2136404
Keywords: stress, decision-making, cognition, magnetic resonance imaging, fMRI, reward, human, food
Citation: Ferreira S, Veiga C, Moreira P, Magalhães R, Coelho A, Marques P, Portugal-Nunes C, Sousa N and Morgado P (2019) Corrigendum: Reduced Hedonic Valuation of Rewards and Unaffected Cognitive Regulation in Chronic Stress. Front. Neurosci. 13:1252. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01252
Received: 04 November 2019; Accepted: 05 November 2019;
Published: 22 November 2019.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2019 Ferreira, Veiga, Moreira, Magalhães, Coelho, Marques, Portugal-Nunes, Sousa and Morgado. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Pedro Morgado, cGVkcm9tb3JnYWRvJiN4MDAwNDA7bWVkLnVtaW5oby5wdA==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work