The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Stroke
Volume 16 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1510284
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancing Precision Medicine in Acute Stroke Care: Personalized Treatment Strategies and Outcomes View all 14 articles
Cerebrolysin as an Adjuvant Therapy after Mechanical Thrombectomy in Large Vessel Occlusion Cardioembolic Stroke: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Beni Suef, Egypt
- 2 Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
- 3 Egyptian Fellowship of Neurology, Minstry of Health, Cairo, Egypt
Introduction: Endovascular recanalization therapy has demonstrated considerable efficacy in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, not all patients appear to benefit on the long term from this therapy. No studies have assessed the role of Cerebrolysin following mechanical thrombectomy (MT). The present study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin as add-on treatment to MT in patients with cardioembolic AIS.Methods: This study evaluated 150 patients admitted to the stroke unit. Data were prospectively collected from 75 patients with cardioembolic AIS and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥10, who underwent successful MT ± recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). Patients fulfilling inclusion criteria were consecutively enrolled and treated with Cerebrolysin at a daily dose of 30 ml for 14 days, with treatment initiated within eight hours following MT. Patients were compared with a historical control group of 75 well-matched patients who underwent MT ± rt-PA but did not receive Cerebrolysin. The primary outcome measure was a favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS = 0-2) at day 90. Secondary parameters included the NIHSS, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the rate of hemorrhagic transformation, mortality, and adverse events. Propensity score matching was performed to match the variables between the compared groups.Results and discussion: The overall results demonstrated that patients treated with Cerebrolysin exhibited a significantly higher proportion of mRS scores of 0-2 at day 90 (64% vs 34.7%) in comparison to the control group. This finding was consistent with lower NIHSS and mRS scores at all study visits, and a lower any hemorrhagic transformation rate (20% vs. 57.3%). Furthermore, the logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with favorable mRS scores were less likely to undergo hemorrhagic transformation (odds ratio = 2.75, 95% confidence interval = 1.17, 6.45; p = 0.002). The administration of Cerebrolysin as an add-on treatment resulted in a significant benefit for AIS patients following MT, characterized by an improvement in mRS and NIHSS scores, along with a reduced rate of hemorrhagic transformation. The administration of Cerebrolysin was safe and well tolerated. Further studies are required to confirm these results.
Keywords: Cerebrolysin, Mechanical thrombectomy, Cardioembolic ischemic stroke, Cerebroprotection, endovascular recanalization Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt, Complex Script Font: Arial, 11 pt Font: (Default) Calibri
Received: 12 Oct 2024; Accepted: 27 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 ElBassiouny, Shehata, Zaki, Bedros and Nasser. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Mohamed S.A. Shehata, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.