Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.
Sec. Artificial Intelligence in Neurology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1467307

Predictive Modeling of Sensory Responses in Deep Brain Stimulation

Provisionally accepted
László Halász László Halász 1,2*Bastian E. Sajonz Bastian E. Sajonz 3*Gabriella Miklós Gabriella Miklós 1,4,5*Gijs Van Elswijk Gijs Van Elswijk 5*Saman Hagh Gooie Saman Hagh Gooie 5*Bálint Várkuti Bálint Várkuti 5*Gertrud Tamas Gertrud Tamas 1Volker A. Coenen Volker A. Coenen 3,6Loránd Erōss Loránd Erōss 1*
  • 1 Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
  • 2 Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
  • 3 University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
  • 4 János Szentágothai Doctoral School of Neurosciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
  • 5 CereGate GmbH, München, Germany
  • 6 University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Although stimulation-induced sensations are typically considered undesirable side effects in clinical DBS therapy, there are emerging scenarios, such as computer-brain interface applications, where these sensations may be intentionally created. The selection of stimulation parameters, whether to avoid or induce sensations, is a challenging task due to the vast parameter space involved. This study aims to streamline DBS parameter selection by employing a machine learning model to predict the occurrence and somatic location of paresthesias in response to thalamic DBS. Methods: We used a dataset comprising 3359 paresthetic sensations collected from 18 thalamic DBS leads from 10 individuals in two clinical centers. For each stimulation, we modeled the Volume of Tissue Activation (VTA). We then used the stimulation parameters and the VTA information to train a machine learning model to predict the occurrence of sensations and their corresponding somatic areas. Results: Our results show fair to substantial agreement with ground truth in predicting the presence and somatic location of DBS-evoked paresthesias, with Kappa values ranging from 0.31 to 0.72. We observed comparable performance in predicting the presence of paresthesias for both seen and unseen cases (Kappa 0.72 vs. 0.60). However, Kappa agreement for predicting specific somatic locations was significantly lower for unseen cases (0.53 vs. 0.31). Conclusion: The results suggest that machine learning can potentially be used to optimize DBS parameter selection, leading to faster and more efficient postoperative management. Outcome predictions may be used to guide clinical DBS programming or tuning of DBS based computer-brain interfaces.

    Keywords: DBS programming, Paresthesia, machine learning, computer-brain interfaces, prediction

    Received: 19 Jul 2024; Accepted: 18 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Halász, Sajonz, Miklós, Van Elswijk, Hagh Gooie, Várkuti, Tamas, Coenen and Erōss. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    László Halász, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary
    Bastian E. Sajonz, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, 79106, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
    Gabriella Miklós, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary
    Gijs Van Elswijk, CereGate GmbH, München, Germany
    Saman Hagh Gooie, CereGate GmbH, München, Germany
    Bálint Várkuti, CereGate GmbH, München, Germany
    Loránd Erōss, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.