Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Neurol.
Sec. Movement Disorders
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1452741

Rate of motor progression in Parkinson's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Neurology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
  • 2 Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
  • 3 Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  • 4 Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: The search for neuroprotective treatments for Parkinson's disease (PD) still relies largely on motor disability scales. A limitation of these tools is the strong influence of symptomatic dopaminergic treatment effects. Drawing on a wealth of published information, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of motor progression in PD and its relationships with dopaminergic therapy. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL to identify 84 publications with adequate serial motor scores to calculate progression, expressed as increase in percentage of maximum disability. Results: A random-effects model showed motor progression at 2.0% p.a. (95% CI 1.7-2.4%). There were no significant differences by baseline age, sample size or observation period. However, untreated patients, in 8 publications, progressed at 4.5% p.a. compared with 1.6% p.a. in 76 studies containing individuals on dopaminergic drugs (p = 0.0004, q = 0.003). This was supported by research on phenoconversion in prodromal PD, where motor progression exceeded 5% p.a. in the 2 years before diagnosis. Starting levodopa improved pre-treatment disability by 40.3 ± 15.2%. Practically defined off state measurements increase faster than on scores by a modest degree (p = 0.05). Conclusions: This survey suggests that accurate long-term measurements of motor progression to assess disease-modifying therapies can be conducted despite sequential commencement of dopaminergic drugs and sample attrition over time. While study designs involving prodromal or untreated PD avoid confounding effects of symptomatic treatment, different assumptions about motor progression may be needed. A defined off state with levodopa test dose method maximises information about medication cycle once dopaminergic therapy has begun.

    Keywords: Parkinson's disease, Levodopa, progression, Natural History, Meta-analysis

    Received: 21 Jun 2024; Accepted: 04 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Pauwels, Phan, Ding, Phan and Kempster. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Peter Kempster, Department of Neurology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.