Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mol. Biosci.
Sec. Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1430794
This article is part of the Research Topic Machine Learning Approaches for Differential Diagnosis, Prognosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Digestive System Disorders View all 7 articles

Integrating Molecular, Biochemical, and Immunohistochemical Features as Predictors of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Drug Response Using Machine-Learning Algorithm

Provisionally accepted
Marwa Matboli Marwa Matboli 1*Hiba S. Al-Amodi Hiba S. Al-Amodi 2ABDELRAHMAN KHALED ABDELRAHMAN KHALED 3Radwa Khaled Radwa Khaled 4,5Marwa Ali Marwa Ali 1Hala F. Kamel Hala F. Kamel 2Manal S. Hamid Manal S. Hamid 1Hind A. ELsawi Hind A. ELsawi 1Eman K. Habib Eman K. Habib 1Ibrahim Youssef Ibrahim Youssef 6
  • 1 Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • 2 Umm al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia
  • 3 Nile University, Giza, Giza, Egypt
  • 4 Modern University for Technology & Information (MTI), Cairo, Beni Suef, Egypt
  • 5 Modern University for Information and Technology, Cairo, Cairo, Egypt
  • 6 Cairo University, Giza, Giza, Egypt

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Liver cancer, particularly Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), remains a significant global health concern due to its high prevalence and heterogeneous nature. Despite the existence of approved drugs for HCC treatment, the scarcity of predictive biomarkers limits their effective utilization. Integrating diverse data types to revolutionize drug response prediction, ultimately enabling personalized HCC management. In this study, we developed multiple supervised machine learning models to predict treatment response. These models utilized classifiers such as logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), neural networks (NN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forests (RF) using a comprehensive set of molecular, biochemical, and immunohistochemical features as targets of three drugs: Pantoprazole, Cyanidin 3-glycoside (Cyan), and Hesperidin. A set of performance metrics for the complete and reduced models were reported including accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Notably, (NN) achieved the best prediction accuracy where the combined model using molecular and biochemical features exhibited exceptional predictive power, achieving solid accuracy of 0.9693 ∓ 0.0105 and average area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.94 ∓ 0.06 coming from three cross-validation iterations. Also, found seven molecular features, seven biochemical features, and one immunohistochemistry feature as promising biomarkers of treatment response. This comprehensive method has the potential to significantly advance personalized HCC therapy by allowing for more precise drug response estimation and assisting in the identification of effective treatment strategies.

    Keywords: Hepatocellular Carcinoma, drug response, predictive biomarkers, machine learning, Rats Font: (Default) +Headings CS (Times New Roman), 12 pt, Complex Script Font: +Headings CS (Times New Roman), 12 pt Formatted: Normal, Indent: Before: 0.25", No bullets or numbering

    Received: 10 May 2024; Accepted: 27 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Matboli, Al-Amodi, KHALED, Khaled, Ali, Kamel, Hamid, ELsawi, Habib and Youssef. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Marwa Matboli, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.