Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiomes
Sec. Host and Microbe Associations
Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frmbi.2025.1539923

Unveiling host-genetic drivers of caecal microbial communities in chickens through Genome Wide Association Studies

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • 2 Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Lombardy, Italy
  • 3 School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, England, United Kingdom
  • 4 Veterinary Health Innovation Engine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University. of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
  • 5 Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, England, United Kingdom
  • 6 Department of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Biopharmaceuticals, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
  • 7 European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
  • 8 Gujarat Biotechnology Research Centre (GBRC), Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
  • 9 Department of Veterinary Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Enteric microbiota plays a crucial role in the health and productivity of poultry, including influences on nutrient absorption, immune function, and pathogen resistance. In this study, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify host genetic variants associated with selected bacterial genera found in chickens. We used high-density 600K SNP Affymetrix DNA arrays for genotyping, alongside 16S rRNA gene sequencing to profile caecal microbiota from the same individual chickens. A commercial broiler line (Cobb400, n = 300) and an indigenous (Kadaknath, n = 300) chicken breed from India were investigated, allowing for a comprehensive cross-ecotype analysis. Our analysis identified several host-genetic markers and candidate genes associated with the presence and abundance of specific bacterial genera with known pathogenic or commensal roles, and with specific caecal Enterotypes. Wholegenome sequencing data were then used to further investigate candidate regions around significantly associated variants from the high-density DNA array. Of note, we found markers nearby the genes coding for classical complement activation component C1q, ephrin receptors, and other immunity and inflammatory responses as well as genes coding for products associated with vitamin and co-factor metabolism. The results underscore the impact that host genetics has on the regulation of the gut microbiota and highlights potential pathways through which host genetic variation influences host-bacterial crosstalk and potentially modulates microbial community structure. These findings contribute to the growing understanding of the genetic basis of host-microbiota interactions and offer new avenues for improving poultry health and productivity through selective breeding strategies targeting the microbiome.

    Keywords: GWAS, WGS, chicken, Enterotypes, microbiota, Caecal microbiome, Immune System

    Received: 05 Dec 2024; Accepted: 23 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Hinsu, Dai, Dadousis, Hay, Fosso, Crotta, Pandit, Guitian, Tomley, Koringa, Joshi, Blake and Psifidi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Ankit T Hinsu, Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, NW1 0TU, United Kingdom
    Androniki Psifidi, Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, NW1 0TU, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.