Pinglu Li1Shuyue Chen1Ping Li1Dan Xu1Xueyuan Tang2
Junlin Liao3Hongju Xie3Gaofeng Li4Yehong Kuang5
Juan Su5
Shijie Tang6
Jianda Zhou1*- 1Department of Plastic Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- 2Department of Oncology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- 3Department of Medical Cosmetology, The First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, China
- 4Department of Plastic and Laser Cosmetic, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, China
- 5Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- 6Cleft Lip and Palate Treatment Center, Second Affiliated Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
Corynebacterium accounts for around 20% of the armpit microbiome and plays an essential role in axillary osmidrosis (AO). In this study, the effects of Lactobacillus bulgaricus treatment on the microecological environment of armpits and its efficacy in the treatment of AO were investigated. A total of 10 AO patients were enrolled in this study. The patients were treated with L. bulgaricus mixed with saline on the left armpit (experimental group) and pure saline on the right armpit (control group) for 28 days. After treatment, AO severity showed a significant decrease (p = 0.013) in the experimental group compared with the control group, and the Corynebacterium abundance also showed a corresponding significant decrease (p < 0.01). Moreover, no significant variation in Staphylococcus abundance was found between these two groups. The microbe diversity is not disturbed in the treatment. Accordingly, our study demonstrates that L. bulgaricus can serve as an effective probiotic microbe for AO treatment by reducing the abundance of Corynebacterium and rebalancing the microecological environment.
1. Introduction
Axillary osmidrosis (AO), commonly known as bromhidrosis, is characterized by irritant odor emitted from the armpits. AO is ubiquitous in young people after exercise (Toyoda et al., 2016; Shin et al., 2017). The incidence of AO is unclear (Zhao et al., 2016; Chen W. et al., 2021). In our encounter survey of more than 300 college students conducted by the authors, no <30% stated that they could smell a pungent odor on both sides of their armpits after 30 min of exercise. Therefore, the prevalence of AO in young people is higher than has been reported in previous studies (Callewaert et al., 2017; Toyoda et al., 2017; Morioka et al., 2020).
Although bromhidrosis has no direct impact on physical health, it can affect the patient's social life, and some will face a certain psychological pressure because of this condition (Ozeki and Moro, 2016). Between 20 and 33% of persons with AO report that their activities of daily living are affected. Thus, the research of bromhidrosis treatment is essential.
At present, the treatment of bromhidrosis is divided into non-surgery treatment and surgery treatment (Natsch, 2015). In non-surgery treatment, drugs are used to suppress the smell or kill all associated bacteria. Whereas surgery treatment is eradication therapy, including open or laser surgery; however, pain and complications are often unavoidable, making it a hard choice for patients (Asilian et al., 2018). Finding a safe way to improve or even cure the clinical manifestations of bromhidrosis has thus become a new direction of dermatological research.
One important pathogenesis of bromhidrosis is the interaction of axillary apocrine sweat gland secretion with bacteria. Ample evidence has shown that the odor originates from the decomposition of components secreted by the apocrine sweat glands, and caused by most Corynebacterium species and a few cocci; as such, it is widely believed that the corynebacterial abundance is related to the occurrence of bromhidrosis (Natsch and Emter, 2020). The skin surface is composed of a large number of microorganisms. Probiotics play an essential role in treating microbial imbalances in the gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, oral cavity, and other micro ecosystems and have become a stable and reliable component of microecological therapy (Tseng et al., 2019); however, the impact of dysbiosis on AO remains to be determined. Recently, the 16S rDNA sequencing technique has been used to detect skin bacterial components in a high-throughput manner (Zeng et al., 2020).
We decided to study whether the employment of probiotics on the skin could change the composition and diversity of its microbiome and further improve the performance of bromhidrosis (Starkenmann et al., 2005; Callewaert et al., 2017; Fujii et al., 2021). We investigated the effects of Lactobacillus bulgaricus treatment on the armpit microecological environment and its efficacy for AO treatment. Efficacy was evaluated by comparing the changes in the microecological environment and AO severity at targeting sites before and after treatment using previously described methods (Sun et al., 2019).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethics Statement
This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (protocol code R21042, 16 June 2021). Written informed consent was obtained from all volunteers.
2.2. Reason to Adopt Lactobacillus Bulgaricus
Among the therapeutic probiotics, lactobacillus is a good facultative anaerobic bacteria, widely used in producing various drugs and foods. Among them, L. bulgaricus is a bacteria that can maintain activity for a long time at room temperature, and its lyophilized powder is easy to obtain. L. bulgaricus has been used to treat wound healing antibacterial and anti-inflammatory experiments and has made some achievements. Therefore, we chose this bacterium as a preliminary test.
2.3. Experimental Volunteers and Data Collection
We recruited 10 volunteers with different degrees of AO from the college students. The recruited volunteers included five males (n=5, 50%) and five females (n=5, 50%), with an average age of 24.6 ± 1.84 years old.
The detailed inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) males or females aged between 20 and 30 years; (b) both doctor and volunteer can smell unpleasant odors after exercising for 30 min; (c) no present infections in the axillary skin; (d) no long-term medication history; (e) no history of surgery in ampit; and (f) no drug history within 28 days. And the detailed exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) any active autoimmune disease or a history of autoimmune disease; (b) pregnant women of childbearing age; and (c) infectious diseases such as colds and pneumonia.
One volunteer had used antiperspirants occasionally four weeks before the experiment, while the others did not.
We evaluated the treatment efficacy from two aspects: a qualitative aspect, namely the assessment of the AO severity, and the quantitative aspect, namely the microbe component analysis. To assess the AO severity, we proposed a score method by evaluating the degrees of odor from armpits (Section 2.4). In addition, to characterize the microbe component, we adopted a DNA sequencing method to analyze the microbe component of armpits (Section 2.5).
The first round AO severity assessment and microbe component analysis (designated as S1) were conducted before the treatment. Then the volunteers go through a continuous 28-day-long treatment (Section 2.6). Within one day after the treatment, the second round AO severity assessment and microbe component analysis (designated as S2) were conducted (Section 2.7) by using the same methods as described in Sections 2.4 and 2.5.
2.4. Assessment of the AO Severity
We qualitatively assessed the AO severity of the volunteers before and after the treatment. To achieve this, we proposed a score method, for which we relied on some experience from previous researches (Park and Shin, 2001; Du et al., 2020) and improved upon them. The classification criteria of the proposed score method are described below.
1. The assessment took place in a closed examination room, and all volunteers were asked to wear only a light cotton shirt in order to expose their armpits fully;
2. The volunteers were asked to perform strenuous activities (e.g., exercising, jumping) for 30 min;
3. The doctor smelled the patient's armpits immediately, at distances of 50, 20, and 10 cm, respectively;
4. The doctor evaluated the scores, which can range from 0 (denoting the minimum level) to 3 (the maximum level), according to the following criteria:
(a) Score 0, none. The patient does not give off any malodor at any distance;
(b) Score 1, mild. The smell can only be smelled at a distance of 10 cm;
(c) Score 2, moderate. The smell can be smelled at a distance of 20 cm;
(d) Score 3, severe. The smell can be smelled at a distance of 50 cm.
Table 1 summarizes the score criteria and their definitions.
Table 1. Classification criteria of the proposed score method.
2.5. Microbe Component Analysis
The microbe component analysis procedure comprises four steps: sample collection (Section 2.5.1), DNA extraction (Section 2.5.2), PCR amplification (Section 2.5.3), and Illumina sequencing (Section 2.5.4).
2.5.1. Sample Collection
Immediately after the assessment of the AO severity, a swab sampling was conducted for all ten volunteers on their left and right armpits, respectively. We acquired 20 samples that collets the microbial community of volunteers in this step (designated as S1).
Armpit swabs were obtained using a sterile cotton swab (TinyGene company) with the following steps:
1. The doctor wearing rubber gloves moistened the sterile cotton swab with sterilized water;
2. The doctor used the cotton swab to gently swap for 20 times against the center of the armpit, by randomly choosing four areas, five times on each area, and making sure no contact with non-armpits skins to avoid contamination;
3. The sterile swab was cut at the notch;
4. The sterile swab was immediately immersed wholly in 1.5 ml of sterile 1x Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) preservation solution contained in a sterile 5 ml conical tube;
5. The tube was tightly sealed with a tuber lid before being immediately stored at −20°C, awaiting for DNA extraction to analyze the microbe component of armpits before the treatment.
2.5.2. DNA Extraction
The proteinase K method was selected for microbe DNA extraction. The tubes containing swabs with PBS were injected with 500 μL 2% CTAB extraction buffer and 25 μL proteinase K. Then the tubes were thawed in a 37°C: water bath for 60 min to hydrolyze the DNA from microbe cells on the swabs.
Then we removed the swab and reserved the remaining resolution in the tube for DNA extraction. The tube containing the remaining resolution was centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000 rpm using a centrifuge (Thermo Scientific, Legend XR1). Next, 600 mL chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was added, and the tubes were gently mixed for 1 min, followed by another centrifugation for 20 min at 10,000 rpm. Immediately after the second round of centrifugation, 600 μL of the supernatant from each tube was transferred to a fresh tube with 350 μL isopropanol at −20°C.
Samples were mixed by inversion and held at −20°C for 60 min, followed by the third round of centrifugation for 10 min at 14,000 rpm, after which the supernatants were removed. The remaining DNA at the bottom of the tubes was washed with 1 mL of 70% ethanol, centrifuged for the fourth time at 14,000 rpm for 5 min. The ethanol was discarded, and another 500 μL 100% ethanol was added, centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. At last, the ethanol was discarded, and the tubes were awaiting to dry in a sterile cabinet at room temperature. The DNA pellets were suspended in 50 mL TE buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA pH 7.6) with 2 mL ribonuclease (RNAse 20 mg/mL), incubated at 37°C for 1 h, and stored at −20°C (Doyle and Doyle, 1987).
2.5.3. PCR Amplification
We used a two-step PCR amplification method to generate an amplified library for each sample. PCR reactions were performed on a GeneAmp ABI9700 PCR (Thermo Fisher Scientific Corp.) at the TinyGene Biotechnology Center (TinyGene Corp. Lmt., Shanghai, China).
Illumina sequencing is an Ultra-High-Throughput microbial community analysis technique in which multiple samples are mixed and sequenced simultaneously. In order to distinguish the source of each sample, a unique barcode primer was given for each sample during the PCR amplification procedure.
The interested-specific primer pair 357F (5′–ACTCCTACGGRAGGCAGCAG–3′) and 806R (5′–GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT–3′) were adopted to amplify the V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. The primer overhang sequence 5′–AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACAC–TCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT–3′ was added to the 5′ end of the 357F specific primer mentioned above, acting as the forward sequencing adapter. Another primer overhang sequence 5′–CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGAT– –GTGACTGGAGTTCCTTGGCACCCGAGAATTCCA–3′ was added to the 3′ end of 806R rRNA specific primer as the reverse sequencing adapter.
2.5.3.1. The First Amplification Step
The extracted DNA samples were diluted to a concentration of 25 ng/μL. To each of 20 wells of a PCR plate, 1 μL DNA sample, 10 μL 5X buffer, 1 μL (10 mM) dNTP, 5 μL templates, and 1 U Phusion Ultra fidelity DNA polymerase were added. 1 μL (10 μM) of each forward and reverse primer with unique barcode were also added. We additionally added ddH2O to reach a final volume of 50 μL.
All samples underwent PCR with an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 2 min. Then repeat the following PCR cycles for 38 times: 30 s of denaturation at 94°C, 30 s of annealing at 55°C, and extension for 90 s at 72°C. PCR was finished with a 5 min extension at 72°C and insulated at 10°C.
2.5.3.2. The Second PCR Amplification Step
All PCR products were then collected with the electrophoresis method, by utilizing AxyPrepDNA, a 2% agarose E-gel recovery kit (AXYGEN, CORNING, America). The PCR products from 20 wells were then mixed at equal molar ratios.
Then 8 μL 5X buffer, 1 μL (10 mM) dNTP, 5 μL templates, and 0.8 U Phusion Ultra fidelity DNA polymerase were added. One microliters (10 μM) of each forward and reverse primer with unique barcode were also added. We additionally added ddH2O to reach a final volume of 40 μL.
All samples underwent PCR with an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 2 min. Then repeat the following PCR cycles for 8 times: 30 s of denaturation at 94°C, 30 s of annealing at 55°C, and extension for 30 s at 72°C. PCR was finished with a 5 min extension at 72°C and insulated at 10°C.
2.5.4. Illumina Sequencing
Illumina sequencing is the key step in microbe analysis, whereas bidirectional DNA sequencing was performed to distinguish the microbe species. Sequencing of DNA was performed at the TinyGene Biotechnology Center (TinyGene, Shanghai, China) using the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States). Note that we have introduced the barcodes. If the measured sequence does not contain a barcode tag sequence, the source of the sample cannot be determined, which may lead to errors in subsequent biological information or unclear meaning. Therefore, an original sequence is recognized as valid only when it contains a complete barcode tag sequence.
The PCR amplification products were collected by electrophoresis, using AxyPrepDNA, 2% agarose E-gel recovery kit (AXYGEN). The electrophoresis tank was kept clean, and the buffer was renewed. Cleaned, size-selected products were run on an Agilent Bioanalyzer to confirm appropriate profiles and determination of average sizes.
We used an FTC-3000TM instrument to perform real-time fluorescence quantification. According to the sequencing primer, high-quality sequencing fragments were categorized into groups and then clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with 97% similarity by using USEARCH (v7.0). The top 25 most abundant OTUs or tags above 10,000 were analyzed at the six levels of phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species, and the number of sequences of each sample at different classification levels were counted.
2.6. Lactobacillus bulgaricus Treatment
After the first round of AO severity assessment and microbe reanalysis, all volunteers go through a 28-day-long treatment with L. bulgaricus.
We dissolved 2 g L. bulgaricus lyophilized powder (Baiyibao Corporation, Hangzhou, China) in 10 mL saline solution (with a concentration value of 0.9%, Hunan Health Care Technology, Changsha, China) for its preparation as a therapeutic medication, adjusting the concentration of L. bulgaricus to 0.2 g/mL.
The 10 AO patients were treated with L. bulgaricus saline sprays on the left armpit (experimental group), and saline sprays on the right armpit (control group) for 28 days. Topical medication was applied once a day after taking a bath. The application range was about 2–3 cm under the armpit at a volume of 1 mL (about two sprays) each time, followed by air-drying for 1 min. Patients were not allowed to apply for any other topical medicines during the therapy and were asked to keep their diet light diet, i.e., forgo consuming spicy or stimulating food, change their underwear frequently, and keep the local skin area clean.
All ten patients in the study accomplished the 28-day-long treatment and revisited our clinic to evaluate its efficacy.
2.7. AO Severity Reassessment and Microbe Reanalysis
After the treatment, we reassessed the AO severity of the 10 patients to assess the treatment efficacy qualitatively. Moreover, microbe sampling was also retaken to acquire another 20 samples (designated as S2), which were used to analyze the microbe component of armpits after the treatment.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions) 25.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), and graphs were produced using the Origin Pro 2021b software (Origin, Northampton, Mass, USA). Differences in scores and microbe proportions between groups were assessed using paired t-testing. Correlation analyses were used to analyze the correlation factors. All data are represented as mean ± SEM (Standard Error of Mean) unless otherwise indicated. p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant differences.
3. Results
3.1. Scores of AO
In order to assess the effect of the treatment on AO, we recorded the scores of all the patients before and after the treatment.
Figure 1A shows the variation in scores for the two groups. In Figure 1A, each circle represents a patient, and the scores of the same patient before and after treatment are connected by a line. In the treatment group, the scores of AO decreased in 9 out of 10 (90%) samples and only remained stable in one sample. Meanwhile, in the control group, only two samples (20%) decreased in the score.
Figure 1. Scores in two groups: (A) Raw statistics; (B) Comparison results. n.s, no significance.
Figure 1B further compares the statistical results of the two groups. p-values are calculated using a two-tailed paired t-test that indicates the significance of variations in the scores of the two groups. p < 0.05 indicates that a significant difference can be found. In the treatment group, the average score dropped from 2.3 ± 0.213 to 1.3 ± 0.213 (95% CI, p = 0.0013) after the 28-day treatment. The treatment group showed a significant decrease rate of 43.5%, with a confidence coefficient of 0.0013. Meanwhile, in the control group, no significant difference could be found (95% CI, p>0.05), although the score dropped from 2.3 ± 0.21344 to 2.1 ± 0.23333.
Therefore, L. bulgaricus treatment was found to significantly mitigate the degree of AO (95% CI, p = 0.0013).
3.2. Proportion of Microbe Genera
We measured the 25 most abundant OTUs in each sample, comprising a total of 22 genera that belongs to 15 major phyla.The proportions of microbes at the genera level before and after the treatment are shown in Figure 2. We only show the top seven genera; namely, Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus, L. bulgaricus, Moraxella, Propionibacterium, Anaerococcus, and Peptoniphilus. Corynebacterium species dominated, ranging from 0.08 to 88% in Figure 2A and 0.2 to 93% in Figure 2B, with mean values of 0.47009 ± 0.24518 and 0.40806 ± 0.29768, respectively. Staphylococcus was the second-most dominant microbe genus, ranging from 0.3 to 89% in Figure 2A and 0.4 to 92% in Figure 2B, with mean values of 0.27961 ± 0.27961 and 0.27287 ± 0.31028, respectively.
Figure 2. Normalized proportional distribution of microbe genera in armpits. The horizontal axis denotes different samples; for example, S1_01_L denotes the result of the left armpit of the first volunteer before the treatment. (A) Before the treatment (Sample S1); (B) After the treatment (Sample S2).
We compare the variation in genus abundance between the treatment group and the control group in Figure 3. In Figure 3A, the abundance of Corynebacterium was significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in the treatment group compared with the control group. In the treatment group, the abundance of corynebacteria dropped by 18.6 ± 5.6%; while, in the control group, the abundance of corynebacteria increased by 6.2 ± 4.5%. Moreover, the abundance of Staphylococcus showed no significant variation (p>0.05) in the treatment group compared with the control group.
Figure 3. Paired t-test results for variations in the abundance of (A) Corynebacterium and (B) Staphylococcus in this study. n.s, no significance.
3.3. Microbe Diversity
We use Shannon and Simpson alpha diversity indicator to examine the safety of treatment. According to the T-test results in Figure 4, No significant variation in the microbe diversity before and after the treatment can be found in both indicators. More specifically, in Figure 4A, no significant change can be found in the Shannon diversity before and after the treatment (p = 0.5833>0.05). As for the Simpson diversity in Figure 4B, it is not significantly changed by the treatment neither (p = 0.4174>0.05). Thus, the microbe diversity is not destroyed by our treatment, making it a safe solution.
Figure 4. Microbe diversity. (A) Shannon alpha diversity. (B) Simpson alpha diversity.
4. Discussion
AO is an unpleasant body odor or osmidrosis that occurs secondary to excessive secretion from the apocrine gland that becomes malodorous on bacterial activities (Semkova et al., 2015). In recent years, various therapeutic modalities have been developed to help address these concerns (Malik et al., 2021), including non-surgery treatment and surgery treatment (Natsch, 2015).
Non-surgery treatment is the first-line therapy where drugs are used to suppress the smell or kill all associated bacteria. Prior works of non-surgery treatment include hygiene modification and topical agents. Hygiene modification is a method to suppress the smell, including showers, laundering, antiperspirant application. However, the odor will reappear immediately by adopting hygiene modification methods, which can be annoying. For example, to eliminate the odor, patients will have to shower repeatedly and frequently, i.e., several times a day. While in topical agents, drugs like ozone oil, antibiotic and antimicrobial metal ions therapies are widely used, where all associated bacteria are killed. Thus, hygiene modification can be troublesome, while topical agents can irritate the balance of skin microbiology (Benohanian et al., 1998).
Surgery treatment is a eradication solution, including microwave and micro-needle (Li et al., 2020) surgeries, which usually adopts open or laser surgery to kill the apocrine gland. However, pain and complications are often unavoidable in surgery treatment, making it a hard choice for patients (Feldmeyer et al., 2015; Asilian et al., 2018). Moreover, these surgeries might lead to scar hyperplasia of the skin (Huang et al., 2021).
Thus, finding a safe and feasible way to improve or even cure the clinical manifestations of AO is essential in dermatological research. The skin surface has a huge collection of microbial flora. The balance of flora sustains the normal body odor. Probiotic therapy is widely used in the treatment of oral and intestinal diseases (Chen M.J. et al., 2021; Silva et al., 2021), even used in the mental and neurological diseases (Ahmad et al., 2019; Shabbir et al., 2021). In recent years, some researchers tried to figure out the possibility of probiotic treatment for axillary osmidrosis, but there has been no specific conclusion (James et al., 2013). In this study, we explored whether we could improve the balance of axillary flora by using probiotics so as to relieve axillary osmidrosis.
This paper investigated the effects of L. bulgaricus treatment on the microecological environment of armpits and its efficacy in the treatment of AO. Our work is a kind of non-surgery care and can provide an alternative choice for patients to alleviate AO symptoms.
We firstly investigated the effects of L. bulgaricus treatment on the armpit microecological environment. After treatment, the Corynebacterium abundance significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in the experimental group compared with the control group. Moreover, the two groups showed no significant variation with respect to the Staphylococcus abundance, indicating the results were specific for Corynebacterium. Moreover, unlike antibiotic methods, the microbe diversity is not destroyed, making the proposed solution feasible and safe.
We also evaluated the treatment efficacy by comparing AO severity before and after the treatment. AO severity showed a significant decrease in the experimental group compared with the control group (p = 0.013). Therefore, our results demonstrate that L. bulgaricus treatment can effectively reduce the severity of AO by decreasing the abundance of Corynebacterium. Other scholars (Zeng et al., 2021) have hypothesized that Corynebacterium may be pathogenic, but Staphylococcus may be probiotic for AO, indicating that Corynebacterium is a harmful bacterium and Staphylococcus may be a protective bacterium, which is inconsistent with our findings. The addition of L. bulgaricu in our experiment might lead to the insignificant increase in the abundance of Staphylococcus.
According to the data before and after the experiment, we can see that the bacterial abundance of volunteer No. 5 is significantly different from others. Because No. 5 used antiperspirant intermittently four weeks ago. According to the experimental results, we can find that the content of Staphylococcus in her is significantly increased, which coincides with the significant increase of Staphylococcus in patients who use antiperspirants for a long time. However, because the volunteers stopped taking drugs for some time, we speculated that the previous intermittent use of drugs had destroyed the microecology balance of the axillary skin. We realized that the use of antiperspirants and fungicides would indeed destroy the balance of microbial flora. We can tell the microbial flora of other patients had not been significantly damaged after using probiotics, so this might be a better way to treat AO. It is worth mentioning that all 10 volunteers did not emerge any discomfort, such as itching, redness, and swelling.
This trial has some limitations. As for future works, we could increase the samples and select people of different ages with or without AO to get a more significant result. Moreover, experiments on people of all ages should also be carried out to make the study more convincing. To achieve this end, we will experiment on middle-aged and older people who are troubled with AO. Once successful, the experiment will benefit those people's lives with lower costs than traditional methods.
Furthermore, we should also analyze more bacteria to find other related ones. We indicate that more types of bacteria can be tried. This study only investigated one type of bacteria, the L. bulgaricus. Other bacteria may also be effective. In subsequent experiments, we will continue to explore whether bifidobacteria or other bacteria can improve the performance of AO. However, due to the strict growth environment of other bacteria, making and preserving products is also a problem we need to solve.
For further study, we will make productions like emulsion, spray, perfume, and other products with L. bulgaricus so that consumers with AO can buy them freely. We will continue to investigate the safety and effectiveness of products under different conditions. We hope to promote the industrialization of the pharmaceutical industry and make clinical research more beneficial to people.
5. Conclusion
Axillary Osmidrosis (AO) is a chronic condition in which an unpleasant odor emanates from the armpits. This paper investigated the effects of L. bulgaricus treatment on the microecological environment of armpits and its efficacy in the treatment of AO.
AO severity showed a significant decrease in the experimental group compared with the control group (p = 0.013). After treatment, the Corynebacterium abundance significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in the experimental group compared with the control group; moreover, the two groups showed no significant variation with respect to the Staphylococcus abundance, indicating the results were specific for Corynebacterium.
Therefore, our results demonstrate that L. bulgaricus treatment can effectively reduce the severity of AO by decreasing the abundance of corynebacteria. Noticeably, unlike the antibiotic method, in our treatment, the microbe diversity is not destroyed, making the proposed solution feasible and safe.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Medical Ethics Committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
PingluL: conceptualization and formal analysis. PingluL, XT, and GL: data curation. JS and JZ: funding acquisition. PingluL, DX, YK, ST, and JZ: investigation. PingluL, JL, and HX: methodology. YK, JS, and JZ: project administration. SC, PingL, DX, XT, ST, and JZ: resources. HX: software. PingL, GL, and JZ: supervision. PingluL, SC, JL, and JZ: validation. PingluL and JZ: writing original draft and writing review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This research was funded by the Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province, Science and Technology Department of Hunan Province, grant numbers 2018SK2081, 2018SK2083, and 2018SK2084; Hunan Science and Technology Innovation Plan, grant number 2018JJ2616; 2020 Li Ka Shing Foundation Cross-Disciplinary Research Grant, grant numbers 2020LKSFG18B and 2020 LKSFG02E; Project of Science and Technology of Hunan Province No. 2021JJ40932; and The Changsha Municipal Natural Science Foundation No. kq2007038.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
The present study was registered in the Medical Ethics Committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. We particularly acknowledge the patients for their participation.
References
Ahmad, M. H., Fatima, M., and Mondal, A. C. (2019). Influence of microglia and astrocyte activation in the neuroinflammatory pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease: rational insights for the therapeutic approaches. J. Clin. Neurosci. 59, 6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.034
Asilian, A., Shahbazi, M., Abtahi-Naeini, B., Poostiyan, N., and Nilforoushzadeh, M. (2018). Percutaneous ethanol injection as a promising and minimally invasive treatment for axillary osmidrosis: double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 84, 157–162. doi: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_704_16
Benohanian, A., Dansereau, A., Bolduc, C., and Bloom, E. (1998). Localized hyperhidrosis treated with aluminum chloride in a salicylic acid gel base. international J. Dermatol. 37, 701–703. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1998.00543.x
Callewaert, C., Lambert, J., and Van de Wiele, T. (2017). Towards a bacterial treatment for armpit malodour. Exp. Dermatol. 26, 388–391. doi: 10.1111/exd.13259
Chen, M.-J., Chen, C.-C., Huang, Y.-C., Tseng, C.-C., Hsu, J.-T., Lin, Y.-F., et al. (2021). The efficacy of lactobacillus acidophilus and rhamnosus in the reduction of bacterial load of helicobacter pylori and modification of gut microbiota-a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Helicobacter 2021:e12857. doi: 10.1111/hel.12857
Chen, W., Zhang, X., Zhang, L., and Xu, Y. (2021). Treatment of axillary bromhidrosis in adolescents by combining electrocauterization with ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection. J. Plast. Reconstruct. Aesthet. Surg. 74, 3114–3119. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.089
Doyle, J. J., and Doyle, J. L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bullet. 19, 11–15.
Du, H., Ding, S., Gao, L., Zeng, J., and Lu, J. (2020). Microecological investigation and comparison of two clinical methods to evaluate axillary osmidrosis. Mol. Med. Rep. 22, 4207–4212. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11528
Feldmeyer, L., Bogdan, I., Moser, A., Specker, R., Kamarashev, J., French, L., et al. (2015). Short-and long-term efficacy and mechanism of action of tumescent suction curettage for axillary hyperhidrosis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 29, 1933–1937. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13078
Fujii, T., Inoue, S., Kawai, Y., Tochio, T., and Takahashi, K. (2021). Suppression of axillary odor and control of axillary bacterial flora by erythritol. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 21, 1224–1233. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14201
Huang, Y.-L., Hu, S., and Cheng, C.-Y. (2021). How we do it: image-guided microwave-based therapy for axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis. Dermatol. Surg. 47, 738–739. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002508
James, A. G., Austin, C. J., Cox, D. S., Taylor, D., and Calvert, R. (2013). Microbiological and biochemical origins of human axillary odour. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 83, 527–540. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12054
Li, Y., Huang, Z., Ran, L., Wang, W., Yu, X., and Wang, R. (2020). A retrospective study on comparing the surgery and microneedles radiofrequency and microwaves treatment in axillary osmidrosis. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 33, 420–426. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1762837
Malik, A. S., Porter, C. L., and Feldman, S. R. (2021). Bromhidrosis treatment modalities: a literature review. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.01.030 [Epub ahead of print].
Morioka, D., Nomura, M., Lan, L., Tanaka, R., and Kadomatsu, K. (2020). Axillary osmidrosis: past, present, and future. Ann. Plast. Surg. 84, 722–728. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002111
Natsch, A (2015). What makes us smell: the biochemistry of body odour and the design of new deodorant ingredients. CHIMIA Int. J. Chem. 69, 414–420. doi: 10.2533/chimia.2015.414
Natsch, A., and Emter, R. (2020). The specific biochemistry of human axilla odour formation viewed in an evolutionary context. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 375:20190269. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0269
Ozeki, C., and Moro, O. (2016). A study of the suppression of body odour in elderly subjects by anti-fungal agents. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 38, 312–318. doi: 10.1111/ics.12295
Park, Y.-J., and Shin, M.-S. (2001). What is the best method for treating osmidrosis? Ann. Plast. Surg. 47, 303–309. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200109000-00014
Semkova, K., Gergovska, M., Kazandjieva, J., and Tsankov, N. (2015). Hyperhidrosis, bromhidrosis, and chromhidrosis: fold (intertriginous) dermatoses. Clin. Dermatol. 33, 483–491. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2015.04.013
Shabbir, U., Arshad, M. S., Sameen, A., and Oh, D.-H. (2021). Crosstalk between gut and brain in Alzheimer's disease: the role of gut microbiota modulation strategies. Nutrients 13:690. doi: 10.3390/nu13020690
Shin, J. Y., Roh, S.-G., Lee, N.-H., and Yang, K.-M. (2017). Osmidrosis treatment approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Plast. Surg. 78, 354–359. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000911
Silva, G. A., Moreira, A. L., Silva, P. H., Salvador, S. L., Casarin, R. C., Vicente, R. M., et al. (2021). The use of probiotics can reduce the severity of experimental periodontitis in rats with metabolic syndrome: an immunoenzymatic and microtomographic study. J. Periodontol. 93, e1–e12. doi: 10.1002/JPER.21-0285
Starkenmann, C., Niclass, Y., Troccaz, M., and Clark, A. J. (2005). Identification of the precursor of (s)-3-methyl-3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol, the sulfury malodour of human axilla sweat. Chem. Biodivers. 2, 705–716. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200590048
Sun, P., Wang, Y., Bi, M., and Chen, Z. (2019). The treatment of axillary odor: a network meta-analysis. Med. Sci. Monit. 25:2735. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913932
Toyoda, Y., Gomi, T., Nakagawa, H., Nagakura, M., and Ishikawa, T. (2016). Diagnosis of human axillary osmidrosis by genotyping of the human ABCC11 gene: clinical practice and basic scientific evidence. BioMed Res. Int. 2016:7670483. doi: 10.1155/2016/7670483
Toyoda, Y., Takada, T., Gomi, T., Nakagawa, H., Ishikawa, T., and Suzuki, H. (2017). Clinical and molecular evidence of abcc11 protein expression in axillary apocrine glands of patients with axillary osmidrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18:417. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020417
Tseng, Y.-J., Lee, C.-H., and Lin, S.-H. (2019). Modified suction-assisted cartilage shaver for axillary osmidrosis. BioMed Res. Int. 2019:7314753. doi: 10.1155/2019/7314753
Zeng, J., Dou, J., Gao, L., Xiang, Y., Huang, J., Ding, S., et al. (2020). Topical ozone therapy restores microbiome diversity in atopic dermatitis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 80:106191. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106191
Zeng, J., Du, H., Zhang, Y., Tong, X., Gao, L., Xiang, Y., et al. (2021). Efficacy of topical acidified aliphatic ester for treatment of axillary osmidrosis by rebalancing skin microecology. Dermatol. Ther. 34:e14844. doi: 10.1111/dth.14844
Keywords: axillary osmidrosis, Lactobacillus, microecological, probiotics, treatment
Citation: Li P, Chen S, Li P, Xu D, Tang X, Liao J, Xie H, Li G, Kuang Y, Su J, Tang S and Zhou J (2022) Treatment of Axillary Osmidrosis by Rebalancing Skin Microecology With Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Front. Microbiol. 13:821696. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.821696
Received: 24 November 2021; Accepted: 22 March 2022;
Published: 14 April 2022.
Edited by:
George Tsiamis, University of Patras, GreeceReviewed by:
Georgios Efthimiou, University of Hull, United KingdomBiao Cheng, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA, China
Copyright © 2022 Li, Chen, Li, Xu, Tang, Liao, Xie, Li, Kuang, Su, Tang and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jianda Zhou, zhoujianda@csu.edu.cn