data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Med.
Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1477483
This article is part of the Research Topic Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology View all 10 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Depressive symptoms are the most common psychiatric disorder among women with infertility. In low-resource settings, the overall prevalence, and contributing factors of depressive symptoms among women with infertility remain unknown synthesized. Objectives: To estimate the prevalence and contributing factors of depression among women with infertility in low-resource settings. Methods: A review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PubMed, MEDLINE, Google, Google Scholar, EMBASSE, and Hinari, data bases were used to identify eligible studies published up to November 30, 2023. Three authors independently extracted the data. Studies that report depression among women with infertility were included in this review. The data were analyzed with STATA version 14 and meta-analysis was done with random effects model. Publication bias and heterogeneity were assessed by Eager’s tests and I 2. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to identify the potential source/s of heterogeneity. A p-value of 0.05 was declared as statistically significant. The findings were synthesized and presented using texts, tables, and forest plots with measures of effect and 95% confidence Interval (CI). Results: Seventeen published cross-sectional studies with a total of 3528 women with infertility were taken that met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of depression among women with infertility was 48.77% (95% CI (35.86, 61.67). Good functioning family (OR 0.71 (95% CI (0.51, 0.97), I2: 0.00%)), husband support (OR 0.52 (95% CI (0.34, 0.79), I2: 0.00%)), primary infertility (OR 2.55 (95% CI (1.36, 4.79), I2: 68.53%)), women’s history of divorce (OR 4.41 (95% CI (2.11, 9.24), I2: 0.00%)), and longer duration of infertility (OR 6.27 (95% CI (2.74, 14.34), I2: 15.26%)) were statistically significant. Conclusion: Depression among women with infertility in low-resource settings, africa was high compared to high-income countries, men, and pregnant mothers. Good functioning family, husband support, primary infertility, women with a history of divorce, and duration of infertility greater than ten years were statistically associated. Therefore, African countries and the stakeholders in collaboration with mental health experts and gynecological care providers shall address these problems to reduce or prevent depression among women with infertility.
Keywords: Depression, depressive symptoms, Infertility, women with infertility, systematic review and meta-analysis, Africa
Received: 07 Aug 2024; Accepted: 24 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Tadesse, Kumsa, Gedefaw, Chane, Kitil, Chereka and Mislu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Esuyawkal Mislu, Department of Midwifery, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.