Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1494446
This article is part of the Research Topic Cancer Immunosurveillance View all 4 articles

Identification and Validation of a Novel Autoantibody Biomarker Panel for Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Provisionally accepted
Metoboroghene Mowoe Metoboroghene Mowoe 1*Hisham Allam Hisham Allam 1Joshua Nqada Joshua Nqada 1Marc Bernon Marc Bernon 1Karan Gandhi Karan Gandhi 1Sean Burmeister Sean Burmeister 1Urda Kotze Urda Kotze 1Miriam Kahn Miriam Kahn 1Christo Kloppers Christo Kloppers 1Suba Dharshan Suba Dharshan 2Zafira Azween Zafira Azween 2Pamela Winnie M Maimela Pamela Winnie M Maimela 1Paul Townsend Paul Townsend 3Eduard Jonas Eduard Jonas 1Jonathan M Blackburn Jonathan M Blackburn 1*
  • 1 University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  • 2 Sengenics Corporation, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 3 University of Surrey, Guildford, South East England, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    New biomarkers are urgently needed to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at an earlier stage for individualized treatment strategies and to improve outcomes. Autoantibodies (AAbs) in principle make attractive biomarkers as they arise early in disease, report on disease-associated perturbations in cellular proteomes, and are static in response to other common stimuli, yet are measurable in the periphery, potentially well in advance of the onset of clinical symptoms. Here, we used high-throughput, custom cancer antigen microarrays to identify a clinically relevant autoantibody biomarker combination able to differentially detect PDAC. Specifically, we quantified the serological AAb profiles of 94 PDAC, chronic pancreatitis (CP), other pancreatic-(PC) and prostate cancers (PRC), non-ulcer dyspepsia patients (DYS), and healthy controls (HC). Combinatorial ROC curve analysis on the training cohort data from the cancer antigen microarrays identified the most effective biomarker combination as CEACAM1-DPPA2-DPPA3-MAGEA4-SRC-TPBG-XAGE3 with an AUC = 85•0% (SE = 0•828, SP = 0•684). Additionally, differential expression analysis on the samples run on the iOme™ array identified 4 biomarkers (ALX1-GPA33-LIP1-SUB1) upregulated in PDAC against diseased and healthy controls. Identified AAbs were validated in silico using public immunohistochemistry datasets and experimentally using a custom PDAC protein microarray comprising the 11 optimal AAb biomarker panel. The clinical utility of the biomarker panel was tested in an independent cohort comprising 223 PDAC, PC, PRC, colorectal cancer (CRC), and HC samples. Combinatorial ROC curve analysis on the validation data identified the most effective biomarker combination to be CEACAM1-DPPA2-DPPA3-MAGEA4-SRC-TPBG-XAGE3 with an AUC = 85•0% (SE = 0•828, SP = 0•684). Subsequently, the specificity of the 11-biomarker panel was validated against other cancers (PDAC vs PC: AUC = 70•3%; PDAC vs CRC: AUC = 84•3%; PDAC vs PRC: AUC = 80•2%) and healthy controls (PDAC vs HC: AUC = 80•9%), confirming that this novel AAb biomarker panel is able to selectively detect PDAC amongst other confounding diseases. This AAb panel may therefore have the potential to form the basis of a novel diagnostic test for PDAC.

    Keywords: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Biomarker panel, diagnosis, Autoantibodies, Microarray

    Received: 10 Sep 2024; Accepted: 07 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Mowoe, Allam, Nqada, Bernon, Gandhi, Burmeister, Kotze, Kahn, Kloppers, Dharshan, Azween, Maimela, Townsend, Jonas and Blackburn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Metoboroghene Mowoe, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
    Jonathan M Blackburn, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.