Shuang Tang
Jie Li
Yung-Fu Chang
Wencheng Lin- 1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- 2Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States
Avian leukosis virus (ALV) causes various diseases associated with tumor formation and decreased fertility. Moreover, ALV induces severe immunosuppression, increasing susceptibility to other microbial infections and the risk of failure in subsequent vaccination against other diseases. There is growing evidence showing the interaction between ALV and the host. In this review, we will survey the present knowledge of the involvement of host factors in the important molecular events during ALV infection and discuss the futuristic perspectives from this angle.
Introduction
Avian leukemia virus (ALV) is an oncogenic retrovirus associated with tumorigenic disease, decreased fertility and growth retardation (1–3). Moreover, this causative agent causes severe immunosuppression, increasing susceptibility to other microbial infections and the risk of failure in subsequent vaccination against other diseases (4). Viral transmission of this disease mainly occurs through a vertical route from the hen to offspring via infected embryos (5). However, it can also be transmitted horizontally, following direct and indirect contact with infected chickens or virally contaminated fomites (6). Untill now, no effective vaccines and drugs are available to prevent or control this disease. Therefore, clinically, the most effective way to control this disease is the differentiation and eradication of ALV-infected individuals in the population (7).
ALV belongs to the Alpharetrovirus genus of the family Retroviridae, which is composed of a single positive-stranded RNA dimer. Viral genome is approximately 7.8 kb in length and contains three main coding genes: gag (encoding the internal structural proteins of the virion), pol (encoding RNA-dependent DNA polymerase) and env (encoding the envelope glycoprotein). Based on the viral cross-neutralization patterns, host range and viral envelope interference, ALV are usually classified into 11 subgroups, including subgroups A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J and K. The members of subgroups A, B, C, D, J, and K are exogenous viruses, which were found in naturally infected flocks (8).
As a retrovirus, the replication cycle of ALV contains six steps: binding and entry, uncoating, reverse transcription, provirus integration, virus protein synthesis and assembly, and budding. Based on the applications of protein-protein, protein-RNA or protein-DNA interaction detection methods, the ALV-host interactions in different molecular events are found at protein and RNA levels. The interaction between ALV and host factors (including protein, miRNA, and LncRNA) leading to the pivotal steps of the viral life cycle are critical implications for understanding the pathogenesis and developing novel strategies to prevent or control this disease. This review mainly focuses on the recent findings of the interactions of ALV with host factors, surveying the present knowledge of the involvement of host factors in the important molecular events during ALV infection, and discussing the future perspectives in this angle.
Cellular Receptors Associated With Viral Entry
As an enveloped virus, ALV directly utilizes membrane fusion to initiate the entry into target cells. The fusion process, followed by importing sub-viral particles into the target cells, is initiated by binding viral envelope glycoprotein to the specific cellular receptors (9). Although the underlying mechanism regarding the entry pathway of ALV is still unclear, several host proteins that serve as cellular receptors on the cellular surface have been confirmed to associate with viral entry. The subgroup specificity of ALV has been mapped to the surface glycoprotein (SU) domain of the envelope (Env) glycoprotein which is responsible for receptor binding (9). Each viral subgroup is highly specific as to the envelope glycoproteins and receptor usage. Based on the binding specificity of the viral envelope, cellular receptors can be roughly classified into four categories: Tva, Tvb, Tvc, and Tvj (10). Tva protein is the receptor shared by the ALV-A and ALV-K; Tvb protein is the receptor shared by ALV-B, ALV-D and ALV-E. For Tva and Tvb, multiple variants have been identified due to the frame-shift deletions and amino acid substitutions. Tvc is the receptor for ALV-C, which is associated with the member of the immunoglobulin protein Ig family (11). Tvj protein contains two members: Na+/H+ exchanger type 1 (chNHE1) and chicken annexin A2 (chANXA2).
Tva protein is the receptor shared by the ALV-A and ALV-K, possessing high homology with the ligand-binding region of the human low-density lipoprotein receptors (LDLR) (12, 13). The complexity and specificity of this binding drive viral evolution to alter their envelope glycoprotein sequence, making more proteins on the cellular surface act as receptors. The receptor-defective alleles tvar1 (substitution C40W), tvar2 (frame-shifting four-nucleotide insertion), tvar3, tvar4 (deletion within the first tva intron), tvar5and tvar6 (deletion within the first tva intron) increase the genetic resistance to ALV-A (14–16), but does not compromise production performance. Interestingly, a series of amino acid residues involving ALV-A Env binding was identified within the single cysteine-rich domain delineated between residues C11 and C50. The amino acid residue Cys38 plays a critical role in Tva binding to ALV-A SU. The formation of a reactive thiolate at Cys38 (Cys38-S-) was induced when Tva binds to ALV-A SU. If the chemical and genetic inactivation of Cys38-S- occurred, the fusion and infection of ALV-A completely failed. However, the Cys38-S- does not involve the SU-TM disulfide bond’s isomerization and Tva-induced TM’s activation (17). A recent report indicated that ectopic expression of chicken tva gene in mammalian cells confers susceptibility to ALV-A and ALV-K, In contrast, the knockdown of tva gene repairs both viruses’ susceptibility in chicken DF-1 cells (12). Additionally, the amino acid residues G196 and R198 located in HR1 region of the glycoprotein of ALV-K, have been confirmed to associate with the viral entry (18). These data provide evidence for the same receptor shared by ALV-A and ALV-K.
Tvb protein is the receptor shared by ALV-B, ALV-D, and ALV-E, belonging to the tumor necrosis factor receptor family (19). A series of Tvb variants have been identified, including tvbs1, tvbs3, tvbt, tvbr, tvbr2, tvbr3, tvbr4 and tvbr5 (20, 21). TvbS1 confers susceptibility to ALV-B, ALV-D and ALV-E. A single amino acid change (C62S) in the cysteine-rich domain (CRD) of TvbS1 produces the variant TvbS3, causing the loss of binding ability to ALV-E SU (22). TvbT was identified in the turkey, conferring susceptibility to ALV-E (21). Tvbr containing an in-frame stop codon was found in the inbred chicken line 72, resulting in the loss of viral entry of ALV-B, ALV-D and ALV-E (23). TvbR2 with C125S substitution in CRD3 could effectively reduce the susceptibility to ALV-B and ALV-D infection and nearly eliminates ALV-E infection (24). TvbR3 with C298T substitution significantly reduces the binding affinity to SU, causing the loss of the susceptibility to ALV-B, ALV-D and ALV-E (25). Recently, two Tvb variants designated TvbR4 and TvbR5 were identified, which had insert “AG” between amino acid residues 291 and 292, and “A” between amino acid residues 359 and 360, respectively. Both insertions induced the generation of truncated Tvb proteins, causing the partially functional loss of receptors for ALV-B, ALV-D, and ALV-E (26). Several amino acid residues involving the binding and viral entry were identified in the Tvb. For ALV-B and ALV-D, the amino acid residues 32 to 46 in CRD1 of TvbS1 are sufficient for the function as the receptor, and the amino acid residues Leu-36, Gln-37 and Tyr-42 are critical for the functionality of the receptor (27). For ALV-E, amino acid residues Tyr-67, Asn-72 and Asp-73 in CRD2 of TvbS1 are essential for viral binding and entry (28).
The first identified receptor of ALV-J is the multi-spanning transmembrane protein chNHE1, containing 12 TM domains, 6 extracellular loops (ECLs), and a long intracellular C-terminal tail (29–31). The first ECL (ECL1) is critical for the function of chNHE1 by directly interacting with ALV-J SU. The amino acid residues 28 to 39 of the N-terminal membrane-proximal region of ECL1 are the minimal domain for chNHE1 binding to SU. Especially, the residues A30, V33, W38 and E39 are critical for the binding ability of chNHE1 (24, 32). Deletion or substitution of W38 of chNHE1 could abrogate its binding to ALV-J SU (33). Interestingly, the amino acid residues 38 to 131 of the N terminus and 159 to 283 of the C terminus of ALV-J SU are critical for its binding ability to chNHE1 and viral infection (34). Additionally, several glycosylation sites in SU involved its binding ability to chNHE1, including N6, N11, N17 and N193. The glycosylation sites N6 and N11 play a crucial role in receptor binding and viral entry (34, 35). The glycosylation site N193 plays a critical role in viral replication; mutating N193 weakens its binding ability to chNHE1 (35).
Host Immune Response Against ALV
Involvement of Host Innate Immune Response During ALV Infection
Innate immunity provides the first defense line against the invasion of pathogenic microorganisms (36). However, ALV has been confirmed to suppress the host’s innate immune response (37, 38). Studies on the suppression mainly focused on the effects of ALV on immune cells, such as monocyte, dendritic cells (DCs), and macrophages.
Monocyte are the precursor cells of macrophages and DC cells, which plays an important role in innate and adaptive immunity (39). Monocyte infected with either field ALV-J strain or laboratory strains cannot differentiate from macrophages because of cell death induced by ALV-J. This inhibition is associated with the up-regulation of interleukin 1β (IL-1β) and IL-18 and the increased activities of caspase-1 and caspase-3 (40). Although ALV-J infection-induced monocyte death, the underlying mechanism is still unclear. More effort will be required to study the effects of ALV on monocyte differentiation.
Macrophage is well known for their pivotal roles in innate immunity. If macrophages are activated by viruses, microbes or cytokines, it usually plays a critical role in pathogen clearance, immunomodulatory, and tissue integrity maintenance through secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines (41). It has been reported that, compared to the mock-infected control, the monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) infected with ALV-J strain SCAU-HN06 secrets more interferon β (IFN-β) and IL-6, and less IL-10 (42). Similarly, Long-chain acyl-CoA synthase-1 (ACSL1), a member of the ACSLS family was identified as interferon-stimulated genes (ISG), induces inflammatory response through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in MDM, then inhibits ALV-J replication through type I IFN signaling (43, 44). These data provided clues that ALV-J may induce host innate immune response through activating MDM. In contrast, our previous study indicated that ALV-J possesses an inhibitory effect on type I interferon production in chicken macrophages HD11 cells. When host cells were infected with ALV-J, the IκBα phosphorylation is blocked, causing the IκBα accumulation in the cytoplasm. The accumulated IκBα make NF-κB/IκB complex stabilized, prevents the NF-κB from transferring into the nucleus, and finally suppresses the interferon expression (37). However, how does ALV-J inhibit the phosphorylation of IκB and which component (viral protein, nucleotide or something else) of ALV-J affect type I interferon expression and the activation of the NF-κB are unknown. Interestingly, in the macrophage RAW264.7 stably expressing the p27-GFP fusion protein, the expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-12, and the proliferative activity stimulated by LPS were specifically suppressed, providing evidence for the association of P27 with ALV-induced immunosuppression (38). More effort will be required to reveal the effect of ALV-J on the innate response systematically.
DCs are the sentinel cells of the immune systems (45), playing critical roles in pathogen recognition, antigen presentation and T cells stimulation (46). In ALV-J infected bone marrow-derived DCs (BM-DCs), cellular differentiation and maturation were effectively inhibited, following the occurrence of apoptosis via the aberrant expression of microRNAs (47). Interestingly, in the surviving BM-DCs infected with ALV-J, the expression of Toll-like receptor 1 (TLR1), TLR2, TLR3, Major Histocompatibility Complex I (MHC I), MHC II and pro-inflammatory cytokines were significantly decreased (48). The inhibition of differentiation and maturation and the occurrence of apoptosis of DCs may involve the immunosuppression of the host innate immune response during ALV-J infection.
Association of Host Adaptive Immune Response With ALV Infection
Previous reports indicated that a strong immune response was present in spleen of ALV-J infected chicken at 2 weeks of age, and the immune response rapidly decreased at 4 weeks of age. This finding provides evidence that 3~4 weeks post-infection may be the critical period for ALV-J inducing immunosuppression (49). CD8+ T cell response is vital in host adaptive immune response. CD8+ T cell response triggered by ALV-J was obviously observed at 7 dpi in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), antibodies against ALV-J can be detected at 21 dpi and then increased slightly. However, the decrease in the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ could be observed in the thymus at 14 dpi and in the PBL at 21 dpi, implying the period of immunosuppressive effect induced by ALV-J (50). A recent report confirmed that CD8high αα+ T cells represent an effective response to viral infection, but CD4+CD8low+ T cells involve the negatively regulate the activity of T cells (51). ALV-J infection caused severe immunological tolerance, showing the absence of specific antibodies against the virus. If chicken infected with ALV-J, the bursa of Fabricius were poorly developed and the bursa follicles cannot differentiate into cortex and medulla due to the blocking of the differentiation of CD117+chB6+ B cell progenitors, causing development arrest of B cells and the inhibition of humoral immunity (52). Additionally, tyrosine kinase Lyn (a key protein in the BCR signaling pathway) involved B cell anergy by inhibiting BCR signal transduction (53). Briefly, ALV-J SU interacts with Lyn, induces phosphorylation of Lyn at amino acid residue 507, activates the negative regulatory effect of Lyn on the BCR signal transduction pathway, and then mediates B cell anergy (53). Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a subset of mature T cells with negative immunomodulatory effects (54). a recent study reported that Tregs play a moderately important role in ALV-J infection. Upon ALV-J infection, the amount of CD4+CD25+ Tregs was increased in the blood and immune organs significantly and suppressed the proliferation and activation of B cells through expression of TGF-β and CTLA-4 (55).
Cellular Factors Affecting ALV Replication
Non-Coding RNA Involved ALV Replication
The non-coding RNAs (ncRNA) contain circle RNA (circRNA), micro RNAs (miRNA) and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), performing certain biological functions (56). Several miRNAs have been confirmed to affect ALV replication. During ALV-J infection, the expression of miR-23b was up-regulated, and the expression of its target gene interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) was increased. The miR-23b could promote ALV-J replication by targeting IRF1 via affecting the type I IFN signaling pathway (57). Similarly, miR-34b-5p promotes ALV-J replication by inhibiting the melanoma differentiation associated gene 5 (MDA5) signaling pathway (58). Gga-miR-200b-3p acts as a facilitator of ALV-J replication by targeting the host protein dual-specificity phosphatase 1 (DUSP1) (59). In contrast, gga-miR-1650 inhibits ALV-J replication through binding to the 5’UTR of the viral genome (60). Gga-miR-221 deregulates the G1/S transition by targeting cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (CDKN1B), promoting cell proliferation and cell cycle progression (61). Gga-miR-375 and gga-miR-148A-5p could inhibit cell proliferation by targeting Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) and PDPK1, respectively (62–64). Several viruses were found to encode miRNAs, targeting cellular or viral mRNAs to promote an intracellular environment favorable to the completion of the viral life cycle (65). Although virus-encoded miRNAs are rarely found in RNA viruses, a novel miRNA designated E (XSR) miRNA was identified in ALV-J-transformed turkey macrophage cell lines IAH30 (66). This miRNA play a critical role in the carcinogenicity of certain chicken genetic lines (67). More effort will be required to screen ALV-encoded miRNAs and analyze their functions during ALV infection.
LncRNA has been confirmed to regulate viral replication. Lnc-LTR5b derived from endogenous retrovirus LTR is located in the cytoplasm and competitively binds to the binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP), which is the main regulator of endoplasmic reticulum (ER). lnc-LTR5B serves as a competing endogenous RNA for BiP, restricting its physical availability. Upon ALV-J infection, the expression of lnc-LTR5b was inhibited, released BiP, and ftranslocated to the cell surface, facilitating viral entry (68). CircRNAs usually act as the sponge of microRNA (miRNA) in cancer. Our previous study reported that circ-Vav3 acts as a sponge for gga-miR-375. Upon ALV-J infection, gga-miR-375 was significantly down-regulated, while circ-Vav3 was up-regulated. The circ-Vav3/gga-miR-375 and its target YAP1 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) through influencing EMT markers to promote tumorigenesis (62, 63). The non-coding RNAs play multiple roles in ALV replication. However, how ALV regulates these non-coding RNAs to be beneficial or harmful RNAs needs to be clarified.
Cellular Proteins and Signaling Pathways Associated With Viral Replication
Viruses could exploit the host cellular machinery for their replication. There are increasing evidence for the cellular signal transduction pathway involving viral replication. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/serine-threonine protein kinase (PI3K/Akt) pathway was activated in cells infected with ALV-A, ALV-B or ALV-J, the activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is vital for viral entry (69). Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is a highly conserved pathway related to a variety of biological processes, the activation of this pathway benefits ALV-J replication. Viral titers were decreased when the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway was inhibited (70). The chicken telomerase reverse transcriptase (chTERT) might play a regulatory role in the process. chTERT is mutually regulated with the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway to inhibit apoptosis, promote ALV-J replication, and increase telomerase activity (71). The activation of the ERK/MAPK pathway is required for ALV-J replication and is associated with virus-induced tumorigenesis (72). Similarly, inhibition of the ERK/MAPK pathway suppressed ALV-A and ALV-B replication (73). Additionally, viral protein gp85 and p27 increase the production of IL-6 through activating the NF-κB/PI3K pathway and then induces the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A and its receptor VEGFR-2 in vascular endothelial cells and embryonic vascular tissue, promoting tumorigenesis (74).
In addition to the signalling pathway, several host proteins have been confirmed to inhibit viral replication. The oncogene p53 transcription factor recruits histone deacetylase 1 and 2 (HDAC1/2) to shut off the promoter activity of ALV integration region (75). Chicken tripartite motif-containing 62 (TRIM62) inhibits ALV-J replication through the SPRY structural domain (76), and chicken TRIM25, a member of the same tripartite motif (TRIM) family, also inhibits ALV-A replication by regulating MDA5 -mediated type I IFN response (77). In addition, ALV also utilize host proteins to promote its replication. Disruptor of telomeric silencing 1-like (DOT1L) was up-regulated during ALV-J infection in chicken macrophage HD11 cells, inhibition of DOT1L activity or deletion of DOT1L significantly reduced ALV-J replication by inducing the expression of IFN-β and ISGs (78). Cytokine signal-transduction inhibitor molecule 3 (SOCS3) promotes the replication of ALV-J by inhibiting the phosphorylation of JAK2/Stat3 (79). Similarly, cytokine-inducible srchomology2 (SH2)-containing protein (CIS) inhibits cytokine signaling, enhancing ALV-J replication (80). The collagen triple helix repeat containing-1 (CTHRC1) was moved from the nucleus to the cytoplasm to bind to SU, promoting viral replication (81, 82). Doublecortin-like kinase 1 (DCLK1) can interact with ALV-J SU, accelerating cellular progression from G0/G1 to the S phase, promoting cell proliferation. Moreover, the interaction increased the expression and accumulation of DCLK1, promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by increasing N-cadherin, vimentin, MMP2, and transcription factor Snail1 and decreasing the expression of epithelial marker E-cadherin (83).
During ALV-J infection, apoptosis was associated with miRNAs and the GADD45β/MEKK4/p38MAPK signaling pathway. Over-expression of gga-miR-221 and gga-miR-222 promotes the proliferation, migration and growth of DF-1 cells, and decreased the expression of BCL-2 modifying factor (BMF), causing the strong anti-apoptotic ability (84). In ALV-J infected cells, the expression of miR-125b was down-regulated and its target Semaphorin-4D (Sema4D) was increased (85). When miR-125 decreased or Sema4D increased in HP45 cells, apoptosis was inhibited. These findings provide clues that ALV-J inhibits apoptosis by reducing the expression of miR-125. GADD45β was identified as a resistance factor involved in host resistance to ALV-J. When cells are infected with ALV-J, GADD45β binds to MEKK4, then inhibits autophagy and subsequently induces apoptosis (86).
Future Perspectives
To data, there have been no vaccines or drugs available for the control of this disease. The most effective way is the differentiation and eradication of ALV-infected individuals in the population. Development of vaccines and screening effective drugs against ALV is of benefit to control this disease in the future. As an avian retrovirus, ALV integrates its genome into the host genome, causing vertical transmission in chickens. In order to complete viral replication and transmission, ALV must utilize a large arsenal of host factors. Studies on the interaction of ALV-host is benefit reveal the association of host factors with viral replication. ALV can adopt multiple proteins and non-coding RNA to accomplish viral replication. However, how does ALV inhibit host immune response and induce tumorigenesis? Why do the vaccines and drugs against ALV ineffective? Significant gaps still exist in understanding the underlying mechanism. More efforts will be required to identify more host factors associated with ALV replication and elucidate the effects of these factors on viral replication. Further findings of interactions between ALV and its cellular targets will benefit understanding the viral life cycle and the development of effective vaccines or drugs.
Author Contributions
ST and WL conceptualized the mini-review topic. ST, JL, and WL contributed to writing the review. Y-FC and WL contributed to editing the review. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072842, 31802206), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2021A1515011147), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangzhou (202102020942).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Salter D, Balander R, Crittenden L. Evaluation of Japanese Quail as a Model System for Avian Transgenesis Using Avian Leukosis Viruses. Poultry Sci (1999) 78:230–4. doi: 10.1093/ps/78.2.230
2. Feng W, Zhou D, Meng W, Li G, Zhuang P, Pan Z, et al. Growth Retardation Induced by Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Associated With Down-Regulated Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway. Microbial Pathogene (2017) 104:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.01.013
3. Wang Q, Miao Y, Xu Y, Meng X, Cui W, Wang Y, et al. Taishan Pinus Massoniana Pollen Polysaccharide Inhibits the Replication of Acute Tumorigenic ALV-J and Its Associated Tumor Growth. Vet Microbiol (2019) 236:108376. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.07.028
4. Zhang Q, Xie T, Mo G, Zhang Z, Lin L, Zhang X. ACSL1 Inhibits ALV-J Replication by IFN-I Signaling and PI3K/Akt Pathway. Front Immunol (2021) 12:774323. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.774323
5. Tsukamoto K, Hasebe M, Kakita S, Taniguchi Y, Hihara H, Kono Y. Sporadic Congenital Transmission of Avian Leukosis Virus in Hens Discharging the Virus Into the Oviducts. J Vet Med Sci (1992) 54:99–103. doi: 10.1292/jvms.54.99
6. Witter RL, Fadly AM. Reduction of Horizontal Transmission of Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J in Broiler Breeder Chickens Hatched and Reared in Small Groups. Avian Pathol J W.V.P.A (2001) 30:641–54. doi: 10.1080/03079450120092134
7. Venugopal K. Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J: A Rapidly Evolving Group of Oncogenic Retroviruses. Res Vet Sci (1999) 67:113–9. doi: 10.1053/rvsc.1998.0283
8. Payne LN, Nair V. The Long View: 40 Years of Avian Leukosis Research. Avian Pathol J W.V.P.A (2012) 41:11–9. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2011.646237
9. Smith JG, Mothes W, Blacklow SC, Cunningham JM. The Mature Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup A Envelope Glycoprotein Is Metastable, and Refolding Induced by the Synergistic Effects of Receptor Binding and Low pH is Coupled to Infection. J Virol (2004) 78:1403–10. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.3.1403-1410.2004
10. Barnard RJ, Elleder D, Young JA. Avian Sarcoma and Leukosis Virus-Receptor Interactions: From Classical Genetics to Novel Insights Into Virus-Cell Membrane Fusion. Virology (2006) 344:25–9. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.09.021
11. Elleder D, Stepanets V, Melder DC, Senigl F, Geryk J, Pajer P, et al. The Receptor for the Subgroup C Avian Sarcoma and Leukosis Viruses, Tvc, Is Related to Mammalian Butyrophilins, Members of the Immunoglobulin Superfamily. J Virol (2005) 79:10408–19. doi: 10.1128/jvi.79.16.10408-10419.2005
12. Přikryl D, Plachý J, Kučerová D, Koslová A, Reinišová M, Šenigl F, et al. The Novel Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup K Shares Its Cellular Receptor With Subgroup A. J Virol (2019) 93:e00580–19. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00580-19
13. Bates P, Young JA, Varmus HE. A Receptor for Subgroup A Rous Sarcoma Virus Is Related to the Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor. Cell (1993) 74:1043–51. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90726-7
14. Elleder D, Melder DC, Trejbalova K, Svoboda J, Federspiel MJ. Two Different Molecular Defects in the Tva Receptor Gene Explain the Resistance of Two Tvar Lines of Chickens to Infection by Subgroup A Avian Sarcoma and Leukosis Viruses. J Virol (2004) 78:13489–500. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.24.13489-13500.2004
15. Reinišová M, Plachý J, Trejbalová K, Šenigl F, Kučerová D, Geryk J, et al. Intronic Deletions That Disrupt mRNA Splicing of the Tva Receptor Gene Result in Decreased Susceptibility to Infection by Avian Sarcoma and Leukosis Virus Subgroup A. J Virol (2012) 86:2021–30. doi: 10.1128/jvi.05771-11
16. Chen W, Liu Y, Li H, Chang S, Shu D, Zhang H, et al. Intronic Deletions of Tva Receptor Gene Decrease the Susceptibility to Infection by Avian Sarcoma and Leukosis Virus Subgroup A. Sci Rep (2015) 5:9900. doi: 10.1038/srep09900
17. Smith JG, Cunningham JM. Receptor-Induced Thiolate Couples Env Activation to Retrovirus Fusion and Infection. PloS Pathog (2007) 3:e198. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030198
18. Chen J, Li J, Li L, Liu P, Xiang Y, Cao W. Single Amino Acids G196 and R198 in Hr1 of Subgroup K Avian Leukosis Virus Glycoprotein Are Critical for Tva Receptor Binding. Front Microbiol (2020) 11:596586. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.596586
19. Adkins HB, Blacklow SC, Young JA. Two Functionally Distinct Forms of a Retroviral Receptor Explain the Nonreciprocal Receptor Interference Among Subgroups B, D, and E Avian Leukosis Viruses. J Virol (2001) 75:3520–6. doi: 10.1128/jvi.75.8.3520-3526.2001
20. Adkins HB, Brojatsch J, Young JA. Identification and Characterization of a Shared TNFR-Related Receptor for Subgroup B, D, and E Avian Leukosis Viruses Reveal Cysteine Residues Required Specifically for Subgroup E Viral Entry. J Virol (2000) 74:3572–78. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.8.3572-3578.2000
21. Adkins HB, Brojatsch J, Naughton J, Rolls MM, Pesola JM, Young JA. Identification of a Cellular Receptor for Subgroup E Avian Leukosis Virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1997) 94:11617–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.21.11617
22. Zhang HM, Bacon LD, Cheng HH, Hunt HD. Development and Validation of a PCR-RFLP Assay to Evaluate TVB Haplotypes Coding Receptors for Subgroup B and Subgroup E Avian Leukosis Viruses in White Leghorns. Avian Pathol J W.V.P.A (2005) 34:324–31. doi: 10.1080/03079450500179491
23. Klucking S, Adkins HB, Young JA. Resistance to Infection by Subgroups B, D, and E Avian Sarcoma and Leukosis Viruses is Explained by a Premature Stop Codon Within a Resistance Allele of the Tvb Receptor Gene. J Virol (2002) 76:7918–21. doi: 10.1128/jvi.76.15.7918-7921.2002
24. Reinisová M, Senigl F, Yin X, Plachy J, Geryk J, Elleder D, et al. A Single-Amino-Acid Substitution in the TvbS1 Receptor Results in Decreased Susceptibility to Infection by Avian Sarcoma and Leukosis Virus Subgroups B and D and Resistance to Infection by Subgroup E In Vitro and In Vivo. J Virol (2008) 82:2097–105. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02206-07
25. Chen W, Liu Y, Li A, Li X, Li H, Dai Z, et al. A Premature Stop Codon Within the Tvb Receptor Gene Results in Decreased Susceptibility to Infection by Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroups B, D and E. Oncotarget (2017) 8:105942–56. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22512
26. Li X, Chen W, Zhang H, Li A, Shu D, Li H, et al. Naturally Occurring Frameshift Mutations in the Tvb Receptor Gene Are Responsible for Decreased Susceptibility of Chicken to Infection With Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroups B, D and E. J Virol (2018) 92:e01770–17. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01770-17
27. Knauss DJ, Young JA. A Fifteen-Amino-Acid TVB Peptide Serves as a Minimal Soluble Receptor for Subgroup B Avian Leukosis and Sarcoma Viruses. J Virol (2002) 76:5404–10. doi: 10.1128/jvi.76.11.5404-5410.2002
28. Klucking S, Young JA. Amino Acid Residues Tyr-67, Asn-72, and Asp-73 of the TVB Receptor are Important for Subgroup E Avian Sarcoma and Leukosis Virus Interaction. Virology (2004) 318:371–80. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2003.09.024
29. Chai N, Bates P. Na+/H+ Exchanger Type 1 Is a Receptor for Pathogenic Subgroup J Avian Leukosis Virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America (2006) 103:5531–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509785103
30. Hendus-Altenburger R, Kragelund BB, Pedersen SF. Structural Dynamics and Regulation of the Mammalian SLC9A Family of Na+/H+ Exchangers. Curr Topics Membranes (2014) 73:69–148. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800223-0.00002-5
31. Kemp G, Young H, Fliegel L. Structure and Function of the Human Na+/H+ Exchanger Isoform 1. Channels (Austin Tex.) (2008) 2:329–36. doi: 10.4161/chan.2.5.6898
32. Guan X, Zhang Y, Yu M, Ren C, Gao Y, Yun B, et al. Residues 28 to 39 of the Extracellular Loop 1 of Chicken Na(+)/H(+) Exchanger Type I Mediate Cell Binding and Entry of Subgroup J Avian Leukosis Virus. J Virol (2018) 92:e01627-17. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01627-17
33. Hellmich R, Sid H, Lengyel K, Flisikowski K, Schlickenrieder A, Bartsch D, et al. Acquiring Resistance Against a Retroviral Infection via CRISPR/Cas9 Targeted Genome Editing in a Commercial Chicken Line. Front Genome Editing (2020) 2:3. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2020.00003
34. Zhang Y, Yu M, Xing L, Liu P, Chen Y, Chang F, et al. The Bipartite Sequence Motif in the N and C Termini of Gp85 of Subgroup J Avian Leukosis Virus Plays a Crucial Role in Receptor Binding and Viral Entry. J Virol (2020) 94:e01232–20. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01232-20
35. Xu M, Qian K, Shao H, Yao Y, Nair V, Ye J, et al. Glycosylation of ALV-J Envelope Protein at Sites 17 and 193 Is Pivotal in the Virus Replication. J Virol (2021) 96(4):e0154921. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01549-21
36. Wang Y, Yuan S, Jia X, Ge Y, Ling T, Nie M, et al. Mitochondria-Localised ZNFX1 Functions as a dsRNA Sensor to Initiate Antiviral Responses Through MAVS. Nat Cell Biol (2019) 21:1346–56. doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0416-0
37. Lin W, Xu Z, Yan Y, Zhang H, Li H, Chen W, et al. Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Attenuates Type I Interferon Production Through Blocking Iκb Phosphorylation. Front Microbiol (2018) 9:1089. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01089
38. Pang P, Chen FY, Tang J, Ma LF, Wang JC, Zheng SJ. Avian Leukosis Virus P27 Inhibits Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Expression in RAW264.7 Macrophages After Stimulation With Lipopolysaccharide. Acta Virol (2010) 54:119–24. doi: 10.4149/av_2010_02_119
39. Tacke F, Randolph GJ. Migratory Fate and Differentiation of Blood Monocyte Subsets. Immunobiology (2006) 211:609–18. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2006.05.025
40. Dai M, Feng M, Xie T, Li Y, Ruan Z, Shi M, et al. ALV-J Infection Induces Chicken Monocyte Death Accompanied With the Production of IL-1β and IL-18. Oncotarget (2017) 8:99889–900. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21906
41. Braukmann M, Methner U, Berndt A. Immune Reaction and Survivability of Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Infantis After Infection of Primary Avian Macrophages. PloS One (2015) 10:e0122540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122540
42. Feng M, Dai M, Cao W, Tan Y, Li Z, Shi M, et al. ALV-J Strain SCAU-HN06 Induces Innate Immune Responses in Chicken Primary Monocyte-Derived Macrophages. Poultry Sci (2017) 96:42–50. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew229
43. Li LO, Ellis JM, Paich HA, Wang S, Gong N, Altshuller G, et al. Liver-Specific Loss of Long Chain Acyl-CoA Synthetase-1 Decreases Triacylglycerol Synthesis and Beta-Oxidation and Alters Phospholipid Fatty Acid Composition. J Biol Chem (2009) 284:27816–26. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.022467
44. Xie T, Feng M, Dai M, Mo G, Ruan Z, Wang G, et al. Cholesterol-25-Hydroxylase Is a Chicken ISG That Restricts ALV-J Infection by Producing 25-Hydroxycholesterol. Viruses (2019) 11:498. doi: 10.3390/v11060498
45. Avila-Moreno F, López-González JS, Galindo-Rodríguez G, Prado-García H, Bajaña S, Sánchez-Torres C. Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines Use Different Mediators to Induce Comparable Phenotypic and Functional Changes in Human Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother CII (2006) 55:598–611. doi: 10.1007/s00262-005-0060-3
46. Izquierdo-Useros N, Lorizate M, McLaren PJ, Telenti A, Kräusslich HG, Martinez-Picado J. HIV-1 Capture and Transmission by Dendritic Cells: The Role of Viral Glycolipids and the Cellular Receptor Siglec-1. PLoS Pathog (2014) 10:e1004146. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004146
47. Liu D, Dai M, Zhang X, Cao W, Liao M. Subgroup J Avian Leukosis Virus Infection of Chicken Dendritic Cells Induces Apoptosis via the Aberrant Expression of microRNAs. Sci Rep (2016) 6:20188. doi: 10.1038/srep20188
48. Liu D, Qiu Q, Zhang X, Dai M, Qin J, Hao J, et al. Infection of Chicken Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells With Subgroup J Avian Leukosis Virus Inhibits Dendritic Cell Differentiation and Alters Cytokine Expression. Infect Genet Evol J Mol Epidemiol Evol Genet Infect Dis (2016) 44:130–6. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.06.045
49. Wang F, Wang X, Chen H, Liu J, Cheng Z. The Critical Time of Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J-Mediated Immunosuppression During Early Stage Infection in Specific Pathogen-Free Chickens. J Vet Sci (2011) 12:235–41. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2011.12.3.235
50. Dai M, Li S, Shi K, Liao J, Sun H, Liao M. Systematic Identification of Host Immune Key Factors Influencing Viral Infection in PBL of ALV-J Infected SPF Chicken. Viruses (2020) 12:114. doi: 10.3390/v12010114
51. Dai M, Zhao L, Li Z, Li X, You B, Zhu S, et al. The Transcriptional Differences of Avian CD4(+)CD8(+) Double-Positive T Cells and CD8(+) T Cells From Peripheral Blood of ALV-J Infected Chickens Revealed by Smart-Seq2. Front Cell Infect Microbiol (2021) 11:747094. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.747094
52. He S, Zheng G, Zhou D, Li G, Zhu M, Du X, et al. Clonal Anergy of CD117(+)chB6(+) B Cell Progenitors Induced by Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Is Associated With Immunological Tolerance. Retrovirology (2019) 16:1. doi: 10.1186/s12977-018-0463-9
53. He S, Zheng G, Yang X, Dong J, Zhou D, Venugopal N, et al. Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Induces B Cell Anergy Mediated by Lyn Inhibited BCR Signal Transduction. Vet Microbiol (2020) 247:108781. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108781
54. Kawai K, Uchiyama M, Hester J, Wood K, Issa F. Regulatory T Cells for Tolerance. Hum Immunol (2018) 79:294–303. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2017.12.013
55. He S, Zheng G, Zhou D, Huang L, Dong J, Cheng Z. High-Frequency and Activation of CD4(+)CD25(+) T Cells Maintain Persistent Immunotolerance Induced by Congenital ALV-J Infection. Vet Res (2021) 52:119. doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-00989-9
56. Anastasiadou E, Jacob LS, Slack FJ. Non-Coding RNA Networks in Cancer. Nat Rev Cancer (2018) 18:5–18. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.99
57. Li Z, Chen B, Feng M, Ouyang H, Zheng M, Ye Q, et al. MicroRNA-23b Promotes Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J (ALV-J) Replication by Targeting Irf1. Sci Rep (2015) 5:10294. doi: 10.1038/srep10294
58. Li Z, Luo Q, Xu H, Zheng M, Abdalla BA, Feng M, et al. MiR-34b-5p Suppresses Melanoma Differentiation-Associated Gene 5 (MDA5) Signaling Pathway to Promote Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J (ALV-J)-Infected Cells Proliferaction and ALV-J Replication. Front Cell Infect Microbiol (2017) 7:17. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00017
59. Pang Y, Yan Y, Zhang X, Chen F, Luo Q, Xie Q, et al. gga-miR-200b-3p Promotes Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Replication via Targeting Dual-Specificity Phosphatase 1. Vet Microbiol (2022) 264:109278. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2021.109278
60. Wang Q, Ji X, Gao Y, Qi X, Wang X, Wang Y, et al. Overexpression of microRNA gga-miR-1650 Decreases the Replication of Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J in Infected Cells. J Gen Virol (2013) 94:2287–96. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.054007-0
61. Ren C, Yu M, Zhang Y, Fan M, Chang F, Xing L, et al. Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Promotes Cell Proliferation and Cell Cycle Progression Through miR-221 by Targeting CDKN1B. Virology (2018) 519:121–30. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2018.04.008
62. Zhang X, Liao Z, Wu Y, Yan Y, Chen S, Lin S, et al. gga-microRNA-375 Negatively Regulates the Cell Cycle and Proliferation by Targeting Yes-Associated Protein 1 in DF-1 Cells. Exp Ther Med (2020) 20:530–42. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8711
63. Zhang X, Yan Y, Lin W, Li A, Zhang H, Lei X, et al. Circular RNA Vav3 Sponges gga-miR-375 to Promote Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. RNA Biol (2019) 16:118–32. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2018.1564462
64. Yu H, Xu H, Yan C, Zhu S, Lan X, Lu Y, et al. gga-miR-148a-5p-Targeting PDPK1 Inhibits Proliferation and Cell Cycle Progression of Avain Leukosis Virus Subgroup J (ALV-J)-Infected Cells. Front Cell Dev Biol (2020) 8:587889. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.587889
65. Zhou L, Zheng SJ. The Roles of MicroRNAs (miRNAs) in Avian Response to Viral Infection and Pathogenesis of Avian Immunosuppressive Diseases. Int J Mol Sci (2019) 20:5454. doi: 10.3390/ijms20215454
66. Yao Y, Smith LP, Nair V, Watson M. An Avian Retrovirus Uses Canonical Expression and Processing Mechanisms to Generate Viral microRNA. J Virol (2014) 88:2–9. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02921-13
67. Chesters PM, Smith LP, Nair V. E (XSR) Element Contributes to the Oncogenicity of Avian Leukosis Virus (Subgroup J). J Gen Virol (2006) 87:2685–92. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81884-0
68. Chen S, Zhao R, Wu T, Wang D, Wang B, Pan S, et al. An Endogenous Retroviral LTR-Derived Long Noncoding RNA lnc-LTR5B Interacts With BiP to Modulate ALV-J Replication in Chicken Cells. Front Microbiol (2021) 12:788317. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.788317
69. Feng SZ, Cao WS, Liao M. The PI3K/Akt Pathway is Involved in Early Infection of Some Exogenous Avian Leukosis Viruses. J Gen Virol (2011) 92:1688–97. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.030866-0
70. Qiao D, He Q, Cheng X, Yao Y, Nair V, Shao H, et al. Regulation of Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Replication by Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway. Viruses (2021) 13(10):1968. doi: 10.3390/v13101968
71. Xiang Y, Yu Y, Li Q, Jiang Z, Li J, Liang C, et al. Mutual Regulation Between Chicken Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase and the Wnt/β-Catenin Signalling Pathway Inhibits Apoptosis and Promotes the Replication of ALV-J in LMH Cells. Vet Res (2021) 52:110. doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-00979-x
72. Dai M, Feng M, Ye Y, Wu X, Liu D, Liao M, et al. Exogenous Avian Leukosis Virus-Induced Activation of the ERK/AP1 Pathway Is Required for Virus Replication and Correlates With Virus-Induced Tumorigenesis. Sci Rep (2016) 6:19226. doi: 10.1038/srep19226
73. Dai M, Feng M, Liao M, Cao W. Inhibition of ERK/MAPK Suppresses Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup A and B Replication. Microbial Pathogene (2017) 102:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.11.014
74. Gao Y, Zhang Y, Yao Y, Guan X, Liu Y, Qi X, et al. Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Induces VEGF Expression via NF-κb/PI3K-Dependent IL-6 Production. Oncotarget (2016) 7:80275–87. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13282
75. Duan Y, Cao L, Yuan C, Suo X, Kong X, Gao Y, et al. Novel Function of Avian P53 in Binding to ALV-J LTR Contributes to Its Antiviral Roles. mBio (2022) 13:e0328721. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03287-21
76. Li L, Feng W, Cheng Z, Yang J, Bi J, Wang X, et al. TRIM62-Mediated Restriction of Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Replication Is Dependent on the SPRY Domain. Poultry Sci (2019) 98:6019–25. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez408
77. Zhou JR, Liu JH, Li HM, Zhao Y, Cheng Z, Hou YM, et al. Regulatory Effects of Chicken TRIM25 on the Replication of ALV-A and the MDA5-Mediated Type I Interferon Response. Vet Res (2020) 51:145. doi: 10.1186/s13567-020-00870-1
78. Chen S, Wang D, Liu Y, Zhao R, Wu T, Hu X, et al. Targeting the Histone Methyltransferase Disruptor of Telomeric Silencing 1-Like Restricts Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Replication by Restoring the Innate Immune Response in Chicken Macrophages. Front Microbiol (2020) 11:603131. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.603131
79. Mo G, Fu H, Hu B, Zhang Q, Xian M, Zhang Z, et al. SOCS3 Promotes ALV-J Virus Replication via Inhibiting JAK2/STAT3 Phosphorylation During Infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol (2021) 11:748795. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.748795
80. Ruan Z, Chen G, Xie T, Mo G, Wang G, Luo W, et al. Cytokine Inducible SH2-Containing Protein Potentiate J Subgroup Avian Leukosis Virus Replication and Suppress Antiviral Responses in DF-1 Chicken Fibroblast Cells. Virus Res (2021) 296:198344. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2021.198344
81. Pang Y, Zhou D, Zhou J, Xue J, Wang Y, Cheng Z. The Distribution and Localization of Collagen Triple Helix Repeat Containing-1 in Naturally and Experimentally Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J-Infected Chickens. Front Vet Sci (2020) 7:565773. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.565773
82. Pang Y, Zhou D, Xue J, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Zheng G, et al. Interplay Between CTHRC1 and the SU Protein of Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J (ALV-J) Facilitates Viral Replication. Virus Res (2019) 264:32–9. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2019.02.014
83. Zhou J, Zhou D, Du X, Xue J, Yang J, Wang G, et al. Interaction Between Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Surface Protein and Doublecortin-Like Kinase 1 Accelerates Cell Proliferation and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. J Virol (2022) 6(6) :e0165721. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01657-21
84. Dai Z, Ji J, Yan Y, Lin W, Li H, Chen F, et al. Role of gga-miR-221 and gga-miR-222 During Tumour Formation in Chickens Infected by Subgroup J Avian Leukosis Virus. Viruses (2015) 7:6538–51. doi: 10.3390/v7122956
85. Ren C, Xie R, Yao Y, Yu M, Chang F, Xing L, et al. MiR-125b Suppression Inhibits Apoptosis and Negatively Regulates Sema4D in Avian Leukosis Virus-Transformed Cells. Viruses (2019) 11:728. doi: 10.3390/v11080728
Keywords: avian leukemia virus, interaction, immunosuppression, host factors, replication
Citation: Tang S, Li J, Chang Y-F and Lin W (2022) Avian Leucosis Virus-Host Interaction: The Involvement of Host Factors in Viral Replication. Front. Immunol. 13:907287. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.907287
Received: 29 March 2022; Accepted: 29 April 2022;
Published: 26 May 2022.
Edited by:
Shijun Zheng, China Agricultural University, ChinaReviewed by:
Yan-Dong Tang, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute (CAAS), ChinaMingmin Lu, Nanjing Agricultural University, China
Copyright © 2022 Tang, Li, Chang and Lin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Wencheng Lin, d2VuY2hlbmdsaW5Ac2NhdS5lZHUuY24=
†These authors have contributed equally to this work