Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Interdisciplinary Climate Studies
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1431316
This article is part of the Research Topic Nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation View all 9 articles

Grassland restoration impacts human-wildlife and social conflicts in the Chyulu Hills, Kenya

Provisionally accepted
Camila Iotte Donatti Camila Iotte Donatti 1*Nora Moraga-Lewy Nora Moraga-Lewy 1Josephat Nyongesa Josephat Nyongesa 2Maureen Mwanzia Maureen Mwanzia 2Janet Edmond Janet Edmond 1Giacomo Fedele Giacomo Fedele 1
  • 1 Conservation International, Arlington, United States
  • 2 Conservation International Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Grasslands provide benefits for human communities but are negatively impacted by climate change. Climate impacts, combined with human population growth, can increase competition and conflict among humans and wildlife. Grassland restoration, a type of Nature-based Solution for climate adaptation, can improve farmers’ livelihoods by increasing the availability of water and pasture for livestock during drought events. Grassland restoration can also potentially help farmers adapt to climate change by providing human security benefits through a reduction in conflicts, which can also reduce consequent retaliatory measures on wildlife. However, this connection has not been widely explored. This paper assesses whether grassland restoration can reduce human-wildlife and social conflicts in Kenya. We collected information on conflicts using household surveys implemented over 16 months in a total of 1,567 households in Chyulu Hills when grassland restoration was also implemented. Results showed that 88.9% of the households interviewed experienced human-wildlife conflicts and 32% experienced social conflicts. There was a negative and significant correlation between the area restored in each site and both the number of human-wildlife conflicts and the number of social conflicts, showing that conflicts decrease as restoration increases. We also used time as a proxy for restoration, as areas restored, and restoration activities increased through time. We did not find a decrease in human-wildlife conflicts over time, but we did find an overall decrease in social conflicts over time, as well as a reduction in the feeling of insecurity. However, not all households behave in the same way. Households led by women experienced a higher number of social conflicts compared to households led by men. Likewise, a higher number of households led by women had a perception of insecurity compared to households led by men. Based on our results, recommendations include a) to continue tracking conflicts in Chyulu Hills to understand the connections between grassland restoration and conflicts in the long-term, b) to identify and scale-up measures to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts considering the multiple conflict-causing species, including humans, and c) to consider the needs, perceptions and interests of women in designing strategies to mitigate conflicts.

    Keywords: climate change adaptation, Maasai communities, restoration, conflict-mitigating strategies, grassland

    Received: 11 May 2024; Accepted: 06 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Donatti, Moraga-Lewy, Nyongesa, Mwanzia, Edmond and Fedele. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Camila Iotte Donatti, Conservation International, Arlington, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.