Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Energy Res.
Sec. Smart Grids
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1469739
This article is part of the Research Topic Enhancing Resilience in Smart Grids: Cyber-Physical Systems Security, Simulations, and Adaptive Defense Strategies View all 10 articles

Robust optimization bidding strategy for user-side resource-side participation in the market distribution of electric energy and peaking ancillary services considering risk expectations and opportunity constraints

Provisionally accepted
Jiao Wang Jiao Wang 1*Jinyan Hu Jinyan Hu 1*Zhichao Bai Zhichao Bai 1*Hao He Hao He 2Mingxin Tang Mingxin Tang 2*
  • 1 State Grid Inner Mongolia East Electric Power Company Economic and Technological Research Institute, Hohhot, China
  • 2 School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Large-scale new energy grid connection poses a challenge to the peak regulation of the power grid. User-side distributed energy storage and other resources help the efficient use of new energy.Compared to traditional resources, user-side resources are of various types and have more significant uncertainty about their regulatory capacity, leading to difficulties in coordinating decisions about their simultaneous participation in the electric energy and peaking ancillary services markets. This paper proposes a joint bidding decision-making method for the day-ahead electricity energy and peak shaving auxiliary service market based on distributed robust opportunity constraints, which addresses the problem of difficulty in using an accurate probability density distribution to represent the uncertainty process of user-side resources. Initially, this paper delves into a data-driven approach to characterizing the uncertainty inherent in load regulation capacity, constructing fuzzy sets without presupposing specific probability distributions for random variables. Subsequently, a bidding strategy that accounts for this uncertainty is proposed, with the aim of minimizing the expected risk of the joint bidding cost on the customer side. Finally, an illustrative simulation is conducted to validate the rationality and efficacy of the proposed joint bidding method. The outcomes demonstrate that the model developed here surpasses the robust model's issue of excessive conservatism and exhibits superior computational adaptability compared to the stochastic model, striking a more favorable balance between robustness and economic efficiency.

    Keywords: user-side resource, auxiliary service for peak load balancing, Distributionally robust chance constraints, Fuzzy set, robustness and economic balance

    Received: 24 Jul 2024; Accepted: 26 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Wang, Hu, Bai, He and Tang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Jiao Wang, State Grid Inner Mongolia East Electric Power Company Economic and Technological Research Institute, Hohhot, China
    Jinyan Hu, State Grid Inner Mongolia East Electric Power Company Economic and Technological Research Institute, Hohhot, China
    Zhichao Bai, State Grid Inner Mongolia East Electric Power Company Economic and Technological Research Institute, Hohhot, China
    Mingxin Tang, School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.