
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Higher Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1555167
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Problem-solving is becoming more and more seen as an important skill for college students to learn to build metacognitive skills, critical thought, and the ability to learn on their own. Even though this skill is very important, there aren't many approved tools that can be used to test it in schools, especially in Peru. The goal of this study is to fill in that gap by creating and testing a short problem-solving scale based on the Rational Problem-Solving Style, which stresses taking a planned and organized approach to problems. 733 Peruvian college students (mean age: 21.56 years, standard deviation: 4.15 years; 59.89% female) took part. A 15-item Problem-Solving Questionnaire and used experimental (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test it. The scale's validity and reliability were checked, along with its link to academic selfefficacy. There were four parts to the Problem-Solving Questionnaire: Solution Analysis and Planning, Critical Evaluation of Solutions, Generation and Evaluation of Alternatives, and Prioritization and Review of Alternatives. Fit scores from CFA (like CFI = 0.98 and RMSEA = 0.062) and reliability coefficients (ω = 0.73 to 0.90) showed that it was a reliable educational tool. There was proof of concept validity in the form of correlations with academic self-efficacy (r = 0.36 to 0.80). The scale is a validity and effective way to test the problem-solving skills of university students in Peru. Due to its brevity and emphasis on logical methods, it is suitable for use in both education and research, aligning with global goals for quality education.
Keywords: problem-solving, Validation, scale development, higher education, Academic self-efficacy, metacognition
Received: 03 Jan 2025; Accepted: 21 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ventura-León, Lino-Cruz, Tocto-Muñoz, Sanchez and Gamboa-Melgar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: José Ventura-León, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Peru
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.