![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
EDITORIAL article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Higher Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1554082
This article is part of the Research Topic Women's Experience and Gender Bias in Higher Education View all 9 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
brief research reports highlighting women's challenges and emphasizing the need for systemic changes to create a fairer, more inclusive environment. This theme is purposefully broad, and our editorial provides a brief overview of the essential findings from the papers published in this research area.In "STEM and Gender Gap: A Systematic Review in WoS, Scopus and ERIC Databases (2012-2022)", Beroíza-Valenzuela and Salas-Guzmán reveal how STEM fields remain male-dominated, with biases discouraging women from entering these areas. Their systematic review identifies strategies to help bridge the gender gap, such as fostering a growth mindset in scientific learning environments. They argue that more targeted efforts are necessary to counteract the ingrained barriers women face in STEM. In "Gender Bias Interacts with Instructor Disfluency to Negatively Affect Student Evaluations of Teaching," LaPaglia et al. investigate how gender bias intersects with speech fluency in academic evaluations. Their findings reveal that female instructors receive significantly lower ratings than their male counterparts when exhibiting disfluency, shedding light on how such biases can adversely impact female instructors' career prospects and their perceived competence.Finally, Kruse's "'I am the Chair': Women and Department Leadership in the Academy" examines the experiences of female department chairs navigating academic leadership. Through qualitative interviews, the researcher highlights the ongoing challenges women face in these roles, including the "glass ceiling" and "glass cliff" phenomena, which often require balancing institutional and personal challenges. The researcher advocates for structural and cultural reforms that would better support women in leadership positions.Each of these articles enriches our understanding of the unique obstacles women encounter in academia and provides a roadmap for addressing these inequities. Together, they form a powerful call to action, urging institutions to examine and address gender biases that limit opportunities for women and to foster a more equitable and inclusive academic landscape.Overall, these studies provide a clear directive: the academic sector must intensify efforts to identify, address, and eradicate gender-based disparities. By fostering greater equity, transparency, and inclusivity, higher education can become a more supportive and empowering environment for women and all underrepresented groups. By tackling these challenges, institutions can work towards creating a more equitable and inclusive environment in higher education, benefiting women and the entire academic community.
Keywords: Women, Faculty, higher education, gender bias, experiences
Received: 31 Dec 2024; Accepted: 13 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Smith. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Stella L. Smith, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.