Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Higher Education

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1538539

This article is part of the Research Topic Applying Lean Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 Concepts to Enhance Higher Education View all 4 articles

Mixed Teaching Quality Evaluation of Organizational Behavior Course based on CIPP Model

Provisionally accepted
  • Xuchang University, Xuchang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The implementation of mixed teaching is conducive to breaking the traditional classroom "full house" and silent state, training students' problem-solving ability and critical thinking ability, and is an important means to promote the improvement of students' learning methods and teachers' teaching quality. In this study, based on the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model a mixed teaching quality evaluation index system for organizational behavior courses was constructed, with four first level indicators, namely, context evaluation, input evaluation, process evaluation and product evaluation, and 16 second level indicators. Based on the actual situation, we have identified five course performance levels: very low, low, medium, high, and very high, which are defined as the comment set S. Using the organizational behavior curriculum resource database of a public university in Henan Province, this study conducts a survey and applies the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method to empirically analyze the mixed teaching quality of the organizational behavior curriculum.The results show that the mixed teaching quality of organizational behavior curriculum is high. This method can be used for teaching quality evaluation, and can also help teachers diagnose problems in the process of teaching and learning interaction through teaching quality evaluation, so as to promote the improvement of curriculum teaching quality and teachers' teaching level. This study provides a solution for mixed teaching quality assessment. This study was conducted in 2023 and provides a practical solution for assessing mixed teaching quality.

    Keywords: CIPP, Evaluation model, Mixed teaching quality, Quality evaluation system, AHP

    Received: 03 Dec 2024; Accepted: 24 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Bai and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Binbin Yang, Xuchang University, Xuchang, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more