Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Leadership in Education

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1537034

This article is part of the Research Topic Extended Education - Leadership in Practice View all 3 articles

Learning from the diversity of national structures, processes and intentions with regard to extended education

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Upper Austria, Austria
  • 2 University of Education Vienna, Vienna, Austria

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    In European countries, the emphasis placed on Extended Education (EE) differs not only in practice but also in policies and literature. In fact, there are still no standardized concepts or definitions of this specific educational area. The aim of this study is to contribute to a transnational understanding of EE by inductive content analysis of essential documents from five different countries. The results of this study will facilitate a better understanding of shared factors which can be used to improve student access, success and retention in education, generate valuable guidelines for effective leadership and highlight the potentials of public governance for social innovation. As part of the Erasmus+ project "EKCO" (Extended Education Facilitating Key Competences through Cooperative Learning), a research team consisting of local experts in the field of EE from Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland and Austria was asked to provide a selection of local literature on EE that they considered particularly relevant. A total of 19 documents were submitted from the five countries. In the present study, the expert sampling was subjected to an inductive content analysis using MAXQDA software to identify the salient points that emerged from the sampling. The results indicate that five main categories can be identified in the EE literature offered, namely: 1. Factors influencing EE, 2. Institutions and structure, 3. Pedagogical requirements, 4. Content of EE and 5. Factors influenced by EE. The analysis of the data shows that, despite national differences, there are common intentions, processes and structures that are productive for the development of key competences and future skills. Moreover, the interplay of these factors should be considered when discussing EE. The article discusses how national EE policies can learn from the diversity of their structures, processes and intentions.

    Keywords: extended education, Leadership, governance, Content Analysis, international comparison

    Received: 29 Nov 2024; Accepted: 28 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Krepper, Efstathiades and Loparics. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: James Loparics, University of Education Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more