The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Leadership in Education
Volume 10 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1536431
This article is part of the Research Topic Continuing Engineering Education for a Sustainable Future View all 12 articles
Exploring benefits of a collaborative Scottish university-organization alternative credentials approach to re-skilling
Provisionally accepted- Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Introduction: Alternative credentialed forms of learning provide important learning pathways for professionals to up- and re-skill. In Scotland, Credit Rating of Learning is one option to create these credentialed courses, based on national principles from the Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework (SCQF) Partnership. However, there is currently almost no evidence on the benefits of such an approach for those involved, so this paper focuses on examining the benefits of having a flexible national qualification system (SCQF) that allows ‘credit rating’ of organizational learning.Methods: An exploratory research methodology using a single case-study design (based on one Scottish university) was used. Nine semi-structured interviews (with both Learning Providers and university employees) were inductively analyzed using a two-cycle Thematic Analysis approach to determine themes.Results: The SCQF guidance and the business-orientated nature of Scottish universities in credit-rating learning was highlighted as an important enabler for this alternative form of credentialed learning to being possible. Value to learners focused on having a professionally relevant qualification that had validity, both through possible credit transfer to other programs and providing recognition of competence. Such credit transfer and entry into university programs is a benefit for the university and aligns to Scottish Government priorities of widening access as well as supporting up- and re-skilling. Credit-rating of learning also enhances the credibility of the learning provider’s offering, and enhances their own quality assurance processes. Discussion: clear value to a range of stakeholders is created with the university able to determine its own business model to provide credit-rating of learning, and this flexibility is important to align to institutional strategy, as well as to provide an effective, efficient service. It is recognized that credit-rating of learning co-creates value for the participants, and future research and opportunity lies around exploring this further. Credit-rating of learning has great potential to support national priorities, but this service needs to be better understood by companies and employers for it to reach its potential.
Keywords: credit-rating of learning, Lifelong learning, Professional Education, Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework, Alternative Credentials
Received: 28 Nov 2024; Accepted: 21 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Smith, Choromides, Clyde and Stewart Knight. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Christopher James MacBride Smith, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.