
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. STEM Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1535466
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
STEM fields—Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics—play crucial roles in advancing knowledge, driving innovation, and addressing challenges by means of several mechanisms including research. Consequently, STEM curricula in higher education institutions prepare undergraduate students taking these fields to engage and produce quality research outputs in preparation for their future careers or roles. The advent of several educational resources help these students to perform research-related tasks including artificial intelligence. Although AI use is viewed as inappropriate in doing scholarly works due to concerns about academic integrity and the fear of losing essential cognitive skills, the growing AI dependence among STEM undergraduate students is inevitable. In this regard, the present study seeks to empirically investigate the influence AI dependence toward students’ research productivity, and the mediating roles of research skills, disposition, and self-efficacy. Through literature review, a structural model was proposed and validated. Initially, a research instrument was developed reflective of the constructs present in the structural model where items were also generated using literature review. Eventually, an online survey was conducted and recorded 834 valid responses from STEM undergraduate students. Results revealed that from seven hypotheses proposed in the structural model, six are supported except the causal path between AI dependence and research productivity. The paths between AI dependence to research skills, dispositions, and self-efficacy are supported as well as the paths between these three to research productivity. This indicates the mediation of research skills, dispositions, and self-efficacy between the causal path linking AI dependence to research productivity. The findings of this study imply that strategic integration of AI resources may foster not only skills development but also research motivation and confidence, which together could enhance students' overall research productivity in STEM fields.
Keywords: science education trends, AI in higher education, Educational Technology, student research behavior, Digital Literacy
Received: 27 Nov 2024; Accepted: 27 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Buniel, Intano, Cuartero, Grustan, Sumaoy, Reyes, Calipayan, Arreo, Duero, Rosil, Agustin, Diron, Pingol, Sapuras, Miranda, Julve, Josol, Mercado, Latoja, Cubillan, Fallado, Duran, Ambray, Miranda, Etchon, Ramoso, Rubenial, Ganancias, Orozco, Gracia, Notado, Darao and Cortes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Sylvester Cortes, Cebu Technological University, Cebu, Philippines
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.