data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Digital Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1532802
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The increasing availability of digital technology for second language (L2) learning is transforming traditional teaching methods, yet the quality of these resources remains unclear.A survey was conducted among a stratified sample of second language teachers (N=118) from UK primary and secondary schools to evaluate the use of digital tools used in classrooms. A rating tool, grounded in educational and language learning theories, was developed to assess individual software features. Results showed extensive use of digital resources, with 89% of teachers utilizing digital devices and over half employing more than three different software types. However, evaluations revealed varying adherence to language learning principles.Strengths were identified in the components of 'engagement' and 'input', whereas opportunities for improvement are observed in the aspects of 'output' and 'social learning'.Additionally, higher software ratings did not correlate with usage frequency or price. These findings highlight the integration of digital tools in UK language learning pedagogy, but underscore the need for ongoing evaluation to improve software quality and effectiveness.
Keywords: computer assisted language learning, Foreign language education, Technology, Digital educational resources, Evaluation
Received: 22 Nov 2024; Accepted: 24 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Janjic and Coventry. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Paula Janjic, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.