![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Digital Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1532376
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
There has been a growing shift toward practically oriented research that focuses on analyzing and improving educational interventions rather than merely validating them. However, such research is often prone to theoretical bias and result fragmentation, as it tends to prioritize certain aspects of an intervention without clear justification, losing a systemic perspective. By applying Activity Theory within a mixed-method approach, this study introduces a holistic framework for evaluating educational interventions as interconnected systems, offering a more comprehensive foundation for research and practice. As a demonstration, this study examines the effectiveness of the second version of the mobile application "Ace Yourself," designed to develop soft skills in higher education. This approach enables an exploration of how the application aligns with students' needs, considers the learning context, roles, and competing activities, and ultimately contributes to learning outcomes. Viewing education as a system rather than isolating individual elements reveals new insights and contradictions through their interconnections and lays the foundation for future decisionmaking.
Keywords: Activity Theory, m-learning, Mobile application, Soft skills, Systematic assessment
Received: 21 Nov 2024; Accepted: 13 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ilishkina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Daria Ilishkina, Erasmus X, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.