
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Higher Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1526487
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: With the growing emphasis in higher education on fostering collaboration and reflection, this study examines the intersection of these two concepts by exploring the use of regular reflections in student collaboration. Methods: An embedded case study approach was employed, investigating four student teams over a 15-week interdisciplinary project course at a higher education institution. Each team participated in four joint reflections, supported by Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS). Multiple data sources, including questionnaires, interviews, and documents, were collected at both the team and individual levels. Findings: The findings reveal a positive improvement in students' self-assessed collaboration in three out of the four teams over the semester. These teams also experienced an increase in psychological safety. Triangulation and the comparison of two contrasting cases provided deeper insights into these patterns. While the data indicated general satisfaction with the reflection sessions and the BARS, several challenges, influencing factors, and areas for improvement were identified. Discussion: This study offers valuable insights into the dynamics and quality of joint reflections within student teams. It provides practical recommendations for integrating reflective practices into higher education courses and highlights avenues for future research.
Keywords: collaboration, student teamwork, reflective practice, Debriefings, case study, higher education
Received: 11 Nov 2024; Accepted: 10 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Schürmann, Bodemer and Marquardt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Verena Schürmann, Faculty of Communication and Environment, Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences, Kamp-Lintfort, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.