
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Leadership in Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1521049
This article is part of the Research Topic Succession Planning in Educational Leadership: Advancing Diversity in the Principalship and Equity-Oriented Leadership Practices View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Large urban districts across the country have tried to establish programs or partnerships that would ensure a pipeline of high-quality equity-centered school leaders. However, dubious, and sometimes hostile political contexts have often made these endeavors uncertain. In this critical discourse analysis, we examine the contexts that frame the role of leadership pipelines in North Carolina, a state where the legislature has introduced several measures to diminish educational equity efforts along the K-16 spectrum. We find that the unsettled nature of a legal case, Leandro v. North Carolina State Board of Education, has helped to create an atmosphere of low certainty and that competing definitions of equity frame the role and necessity of leadership pipelines.
Keywords: Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), educational equity, school leadership and school reform, politics of education, Educational polices
Received: 01 Nov 2024; Accepted: 18 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Lewis-Durham, Bradford, Hernandez and Clarida. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Tiffanie Lewis-Durham, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.