Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Educ.
Sec. STEM Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602

Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Tsinghua Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China, Shenzhen, China
  • 2 Food Science and Technology Program, Department of Life Sciences, BNU-HKBU United International College, 2000 Jintong Road, Tangjiawan, Zhuhai, 519087, China, Zhuhai, China
  • 3 Institute of Biopharmaceutical and Health Engineering, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China, Shenzhen, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    As the landscape of higher education continues to evolve, institutions must adapt to meet the changing needs of prospective graduate students. This article explores the implications of student-centered strategies on the academic and personal growth of graduate science students.The traditional teacher-centered approach, while effective in conveying foundational knowledge, has been criticized for hindering the development of critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills. In contrast, the student-centered approach shifts the focus to learners, encouraging active participation and fostering essential skills needed to address modern scientific challenges. The teaching concepts, "for the student," "of the student," and "by the student" emphasize inclusivity, peer collaboration, and encouraging students to take ownership of their education.A prime example of the success of this approach can be seen in the "Molecular Basis of Cancer" course, which transitioned from a traditional teacher-centered model to a studentcentered one. This shift has allowed students to engage more deeply with complex scientific concepts, fostering independent learning, peer-led discussions, and collaborative research. The results of this transition are evident not only in improved academic performance but also in significant scientific outputs, such as published research articles co-authored by students. By encouraging critical inquiry, creativity, and a professional attitude, the course enables graduate students to navigate real-world scientific challenges more effectively. This case study highlights the accomplishments of student-centered model while identifying areas for further improvement in teaching practices and curriculum design. It underscores the importance of student-centered teaching in shaping future scientific leaders by providing a more balanced, dynamic, and inclusive learning environment for graduate students in science-education. As education continues to evolve, blending traditional methods with student-centered approaches will be key to creating engaging and empowering educational experiences that meet the demands of both students and the ever-advancing fields of science and technology.

    Keywords: Student-centered-approach, Critical Thinking, Collaborative Learning, Curriculum Design, Scientific challenges, Active participation

    Received: 28 Oct 2024; Accepted: 30 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 BHARDWAJ, ZHANG, TAN and PANDEY. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Vijay PANDEY, Tsinghua Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China, Shenzhen, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.