Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Higher Education

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1515877

This article is part of the Research Topic Institutional Impact Measurement in Higher Education View all 8 articles

Academic risk model through the analytical hierarchical process (AHP)

Provisionally accepted
Ana Oña Ana Oña 1*Carmen Gloria Burgos Carmen Gloria Burgos 2Jorge Castillo Jorge Castillo 2Manuel Molina Manuel Molina 2Milena Murillo Milena Murillo 2
  • 1 Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland
  • 2 Universidad de Atacama, Copiapó, Chile

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Higher education institutions, especially those reliant on public funding, focus heavily on academic performance and student dropout rates. Early identification of students with academic challenges is crucial for timely intervention. However, many predictive models are complex, data-intensive, and applicable only after students begin their studies. This study employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to create an indicator predicting academic performance for first-year students. This indicator combines commonly used variables with insights from past dropout cases, tailored to each university's and/or faculty context. The methodology was piloted with the Commercial Engineering department and the Technological Learning Complex at the University of Atacama in Chile. The index construction involved four stages: 1) defining dimensions and variables, 2) pairwise selection to determine weights, 3) index construction, and 4) validation. The index used 18 variables across four dimensions, with final weights assigned as follows: academic (49.7%), inclusion (32.8%), economic (8.9%), and social (8.6%). This academic risk index was tested against the 2018 cohort of the Commercial Engineering degree, showing an 82% match with actual student performance. This methodology offers a practical tool for creating academic performance indexes tailored to students entering to first time to the university, addressing the specific needs of individual institutions.

    Keywords: higher education, student dropout, Dropout rate, Composite index, Analytic hierarchy process

    Received: 23 Oct 2024; Accepted: 24 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Oña, Burgos, Castillo, Molina and Murillo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Ana Oña, Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more