Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.
Sec. Mental Health and Wellbeing in Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1514895

School and Student Characteristics related to Primary and Secondary School Students' Socialemotional Functioning

Provisionally accepted
Anne de Bruijn Anne de Bruijn *Melanie Ehren Melanie Ehren Martijn Meeter Martijn Meeter Anne Fleur Kortekaas-Rijlaarsdam Anne Fleur Kortekaas-Rijlaarsdam
  • LEARN! Research Institute, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: A healthy social-emotional functioning is vital for students' general development and wellbeing. The school environment is a major determinant of social-emotional functioning, yet little is known about school-level and student-level characteristics related to healthy social-emotional functioning. In this study, we examined school-level characteristics (school size, school disadvantage score, urbanization level, and school denomination) and student-level characteristics (grade, secondary school track, participation in a COVID-19-related catch-up programme, and measurement momentduring or after COVID-19) as predictors of students' motivation for school, academic self-concept, social acceptance, and school wellbeing.In school year 2020-2021, just after the first Covid-19 outbreak, 3764 parents of primary school students from 242 Dutch primary schools and 2545 secondary school students from 62 secondary schools filled out online questionnaires, before and after a Covid-19 related catch-up programme was implemented at their school. Reliable and validated questionnaires were used to assess students' motivation (Intrinsic Motivation Inventory), academic self-concept (Harter Self Perception Profile for Children; Self-Description Questionnaire-II), school wellbeing (Dutch School Questionnaire) and social acceptance (PRIMA Social Acceptance Questionnaire). School characteristics were derived from online databases. Student participation in a catch-up programme and measurement moment (before or after the programme) were taken into account. Data was analysed via multilevel General Linear Mixed Models, separately for primary and secondary education.Of the school-level factors, only school disadvantage score was a significant predictor, specifically for primary school students' motivation. Of the student-level characteristics, grade and catch-up participation were significant predictors of lower motivation, academic self-concept and school-wellbeing in primary school. In secondary school, students in higher grades had significantly lower motivation and school wellbeing; participants in catch-up programme had a significantly lower academic self-concept; and perceived social-acceptance and school wellbeing were significantly lower just after COVID-19.School-level characteristics only played a minor role in explaining differences in students' social-emotional functioning. In both primary and secondary education, students in higher grades and participating in catch-up programmes scored lower on their social-emotional functioning. Schools should be aware of students in higher grades being at risk for more problems in their socialemotional functioning.

    Keywords: Primary education, Secondary education, Social-Emotional Development, Academic Motivation, academic self-perception, Student wellbeing, Peer acceptance, Educational effectiveness

    Received: 21 Oct 2024; Accepted: 03 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 de Bruijn, Ehren, Meeter and Kortekaas-Rijlaarsdam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Anne de Bruijn, LEARN! Research Institute, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.