
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Leadership in Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1485034
This article is part of the Research TopicContinuing Engineering Education for a Sustainable FutureView all 19 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The rapidly evolving and technology-driven labor market underscores the need for continuous education and lifelong learning to ensure individuals remain adaptable and professionally relevant. It demands institutions that effectively bridge the gap between education and the workforce by promptly and pertinently modifying its programs and curricula, led by educators who are highly experts in specific skills and knowledge, as well as with pedagogical knowledge. In this address, robust educational models become essential. The TEC21 Educational Model (TEC21), introduced in 2019 by Tecnologico de Monterrey, addresses these challenges by fostering disciplinary and transversal competencies critical for success in the professional and personal spheres. This study explores two key research questions: (1) How do students in international experiences perceive the implementation of TEC21's four components—inspiring professors, flexibility, challenge-based learning (CBL), and memorable university experiences—at their home and host universities? (2) How does TEC21 align with the European Commission's Industry 4.0 Curriculum Guidelines? Semi-structured interviews were conducted with thirteen Mexican engineering undergraduates during their international study experiences using a cross-sectional qualitative design. The findings reveal that Inspiring Professors—characterized by continuous pedagogical training and deep expertise in industry, consulting, or research—stood out as pivotal in preparing students for complex, real-world contexts. Flexibility and accessibility enable students to balance diverse priorities through hybrid learning environments, a critical feature for lifelong learners. For CBL, the model's emphasis on interdisciplinary, real-world projects fosters employability, although collaboration with socio-formative organizations was less evident at host universities. The Memorable University Experience component highlighted the transformative nature of internationalization despite limited engagement with extracurricular activities and student organizations at host institutions. This study demonstrates TEC21's alignment with the European Commission's Industry 4.0 Curriculum Guidelines, addressing key pillars such as collaboration, quality assurance, and curriculum content. This model can inspire continuous education institutions to bridge the gap between education and industry demands. It equips graduates with adaptability, interdisciplinary collaboration skills, and global readiness, positioning TEC21 as a cornerstone for lifelong learning and sustainable societal advancement in the Artificial Intelligence era.
Keywords: Tec21, Competency-Based Education, Educational models, studying abroad experience, higher education, Educational innovation, Lifelong learning
Received: 23 Aug 2024; Accepted: 13 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Camacho-Zuñiga, Salas-Maxemín, Valle-Arce, Caratozzolo and Chans. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Guillermo M. Chans, Institute for the Future of Education, Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education (ITESM), Monterrey, Mexico
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.