Skip to main content

CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS article

Front. Educ.

Sec. STEM Education

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1472703

This article is part of the Research Topic Building Tomorrow’s Biomedical Workforce: Evaluation of How Evidence-Based Training Programs Align Skill Development and Career Awareness with a Broad Array of Professions View all 18 articles

Ecosystem Assessment and Translating a Groundskeeping Framework into Practice for Promoting Systemic Change in Higher Education

Provisionally accepted
Beronda L Montgomery Beronda L Montgomery 1*Sherilynn J Black Sherilynn J Black 2
  • 1 Grinnell College, Grinnell, United States
  • 2 Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Many institutions include equity as a stated foundational value of their academic missions but often face significant challenges when initiating practices and policies that are aligned with this goal. We propose that institutions and biomedical research environments require innovative approaches to move systems toward equitable environments. The effective transformation of systems involves steps that include an assessment of the current environment; a clear delineation of institutional goals; commitment of resources, structures of accountability, and recognition and/or rewards; as well as identification of transformative or visionary leaders. In the assessment of current systems as progress toward the establishment and cultivation of systems that promote equity, it is critical to identify and maintain effective current practices and to execute necessary changes by drawing on existing change theories or deploying innovative approaches to institutional transformation. The Groundskeeping theoretical framework aligns well with the goal of creating such systems in that it seeks to dismantle 1) notions of the status quo, 2) faulty notions of unbiased meritocracy, and 3) behaviors that create barriers preventing access and advancement. Instead, Groundskeeping creates permissive environments that advance systems toward sustained equitable outcomes. Here, we present an approach that uses the Groundskeeping framework as one possible means for approaching institutional change by initiating system-level changes in academic and biomedical environments. We provide a step-by-step roadmap to initiate effective approaches that address structural challenges arising from behaviors perpetuating accepted norms, and we also discuss ways to build capacity among individuals as they assess their environments and foster change in their organizations. Finally, we highlight recent effective national approaches aligned with the Groundskeeping framework that work toward change in institutional environments. Ideally, such approaches could be applied in a variety of organizational settings and will translate across different environments to initiate systemic change.

    Keywords: diversity, Equity, inclusion, higher education, Institutional transformation, Systemic change, systems, groundskeeping

    Received: 29 Jul 2024; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Montgomery and Black. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Beronda L Montgomery, Grinnell College, Grinnell, 48824, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more