The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Language, Culture and Diversity
Volume 10 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1431793
This article is part of the Research Topic Situating Equity at the Center of Continuous Improvement in Education View all 7 articles
Supporting a State in Developing a Working Theory of Improvement for Promoting Equity in Science Education
Provisionally accepted- 1 Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States
- 2 University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
- 3 University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States
Introduction: This study explored the potential of developing a working theory of improvement to create a more equitable system of science education at the level of a US state. A working theory is a provisional model for guiding improvement efforts. We ask: How can tools from a long-term research-practice partnership support a state team in initiating improvement research toward promoting a more equitable system of science education? Methods: This design study took place in winter 2024 in a single state. External partners supported leaders in a northeastern US state in articulating aims, specifying primary and secondary drivers, and identifying change strategies to promote a more equitable science education system, grounded in A Framework for K-12 Science Education (National Research Council, 2012). We rely on descriptive analyses of joint meetings and a focus group with state leaders to describe tools supporting the process, the team’s use of these tools to draft the Driver Diagram, and issues surfaced while developing it with state interest holders. Results: Two meanings of equity emerged as significant: the importance of universal access to professional learning and the importance of culturally relevant instruction for students. Issues highlighted the need for infrastructures to support professional learning across diverse stakeholders in science education, including teachers, school and district leaders. Curriculum materials connecting to students’ lives and community priorities were seen as key drivers for equitable change, around which professional learning activities should be organized. The team identified several policy changes needed to implement strategies, though members felt they lacked authority over some changes. Discussion: Where past researchers observed equity fading as a focus during reform implementation, this study found that developing an aim statement and driver diagram helped energize and refocus implementation efforts toward ensuring all students engage in meaningful, culturally and locally relevant science learning.
Keywords: Improvement science, Equity, Science, state education agency, aim statements, Driver diagrams
Received: 12 May 2024; Accepted: 07 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Penuel, Neill and Campbell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
William Penuel, Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, 80309-0344, Colorado, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.