The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Teacher Education
Volume 10 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1333713
This article is part of the Research Topic Teaching controversial issues in Secondary Education View all 9 articles
Affective-Sexual and Gender Diversity in Spanish Education: A Systematic Literature Review Educational research on affective-sexual and gender diversity in Spain: A systematic literature review (2013-2023)
Provisionally accepted- 1 University of Burgos, Burgos, Spain
- 2 University of Murcia, Murcia, Murcia, Spain
The aim of this present work is to systematically compile, map, and review the scientific literature concerning education on affective-sexual and gender diversity, produced within the Spanish geographical context over the past decade (2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)(2019)(2020)(2021)(2022)(2023). To this end, this systematic review offers an unprecedented and updated synthesis of the most prominent challenges and areas for improvement in Spain, for the purpose of identifying existing research gaps, as well as curricular and training needs in this transdisciplinary field. To achieve this objective, the PRISMA guidelines are applied in the extraction and selection of indexed materials from two of the principal internationally renowned databases, namely the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus. The analysis was facilitated through the use of bibliographic management software, as well as quantitative and qualitative data analysis tools. The findings obtained address the research question pertaining to the factors influencing the construction of attitudes and representations concerning this type of diversity within formal educational settings. Furthermore, the benefits, limitations, and obstacles surrounding its curricular integration are examined. Various socio-demographic variables of both students and educators, such as age, gender, religious beliefs, teaching experience, personal and social experiences, school-driven initiatives, and the persistence of hegemonic gender representations emerge as explanatory factors linked to these attitudes and representations. Similarly, the visibility of diverse identities, social inclusion, and plurality are associated with the necessity for education geared towards democratic citizenship. The sensitivity of the content and its curricular invisibility, along with training deficiencies, lack of academic recognition, and the absence of specific protocols for preventing LGBTIQphobia coupled with deficiencies in training and academic recognition, are identified as the most prominent limitations or hurdles for the comprehensive promotion of education pertaining to affective-sexual and gender diversity across distinct educational stages. Instances of discrimination, harassment, and both physical and symbolic violence against non-heteronormative groups, grounded in the sex-gender system and cis-heteronormativity, continue to be recognized by educators. In this vein, scientific literature underscores the significance of education concerning affective-sexual and gender diversity as a means to eradicate stereotypes and negative attitudes towards LGBTIQ+ individuals, thereby striving towards genuine equity.
Keywords: affective-sexual and gender diversity 1, LGBTIQ+ 2, formal education 3, teacher training 4, systematic review 5
Received: 05 Nov 2023; Accepted: 13 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ortega-Sánchez, Sanz De La Cal, Ibáñez Quintana and Encabo-Fernández. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Delfín Ortega-Sánchez, University of Burgos, Burgos, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.