Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Educ.
Sec. STEM Education
Volume 9 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1541819
This article is part of the Research Topic STEM: Innovation on Teaching and Learning View all 11 articles

Editorial: STEM: Innovation on Teaching and Learning

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 1Research Centre Didactics and Technology in Education of Trainers (CIDTFF), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
  • 2 CI&DEI, ESECS, Polytechnic University of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal, Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
  • 3 Research Centre Didactics and Technology in Education of Trainers (CIDTFF), Department of Mathematics, ECT, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal, Vila Real, Portugal

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    and social interaction. Both modalities should be strategically integrated into math's teaching to address different learning needs and objectives. Fehér et al. investigate the use of propositional logic among university students in different study programs. They found significant differences according to gender, age, type of secondary school leaving exam and parents' highest education level. Mathematics-informatics students achieved the best results, followed by engineering, economics, education, sciences and humanities students. They also demonstrated that students performed differently in three selected areas of formal logic, with the lowest performance on statement negation tasks. Debrenti and Bordás focus on logical basic knowledge and operations in everyday life, mathematical, physical, chemical and biological contexts, in a western region of Romania. Their main results showed that daily life problems were solved correctly by the highest percentage of students, followed by problems in biological, physical and mathematical context. Students were least successful in logical problems related to chemistry. Thus, authors state that semantic content must be considered. The studies in this special issue emphasize the actual relevance of STEM Education, highlighting further innovative and interdisciplinary approaches to STEM. Furthermore, it addresses how STEM education relates to the development of 21st Century skills, challenges and opportunities. To this end, it is mandatory to continue prioritizing teachers (initial and continuing training) training, as well as using inclusive practices in STEM education. By addressing diverse contexts and using multiple theoretical frameworks, these studies can provide a solid foundation for future research and practice in the STEM Education. We hope that these contributions encourage more innovation and collaboration for STEM Education, necessary to develop innovative solutions to complex and really problems and build a more sustainable and equitable future.

    Keywords: stem education, Technology, assessment, pre-service teachers, innovative teaching

    Received: 08 Dec 2024; Accepted: 30 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Santos, Tavares and Costa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Vanda Santos, 1Research Centre Didactics and Technology in Education of Trainers (CIDTFF), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.