Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.
Sec. Leadership in Education
Volume 9 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1517985

Sustainable evidence-driven school improvement: routines and data use in Estonian schools

Provisionally accepted
  • Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This study examines how five Estonian schools perceive evidence-driven school improvement in a three-year school-university partnership program. In each school, the principal and teachers collaborated with an external mentor. Supported by university experts, the school improvement teams worked on projects aimed at enhancing student learning in their schools and fostering a collaborative, evidence-driven school culture. Data was collected through focus group interviews with the school teams and analyzed using thematic content analysis. The findings reveal that schools view data as connected to accountability and decision-making, with considerably less emphasis on instructional improvement. School organizational and teacher-related factors, together with data overload, hindered systematic data use. Notably, the school improvement program's effectiveness was most evident in the final year, with the sustainability of improvement largely dependent on collaborative routines.school contexts and external pressures to schools (Grützmacher et al., 2023;Kyriakides et al., 2024). Another issue is the short duration of improvement programs that might not be sufficient in reaching set goals or supporting new initiatives in becoming routine actions within the organization (Conley and Enomoto, 2009). To provide schools with enough time to initiate and sustain necessary activities to reach goals, schools in Estonia are required by national policy to adopt evidence-driven approaches in their development plans (Eisenschmidt et al., 2023). These plans, designed for a minimum of three years, must outline how data will be used to monitor school's progress and to make informed decisions on possible improvement practices (Estonian Parliament, 2010). In addition to school-collected data, other data sources are provided by the government, including results from exams or school satisfaction surveys. Data use helps schools reach key goals, such as to enhance instruction, create strong learning communities and to potentially improve student outcomes (Levin, 2010). However, previous research has found that teachers often lack the skills and knowledge about how to use data effectively for school improvement (

    Keywords: evidence-driven school improvement 1, data use 2, routines 3, sustainable change 4, collaboration 5, Estonia 6

    Received: 27 Oct 2024; Accepted: 31 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Rääk and Eisenschmidt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Katrin Rääk, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.