The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Language, Culture and Diversity
Volume 9 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1457504
Exploring EFL students' preferences and practices of study strategies: repeated reading versus testing
Provisionally accepted- Umm al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia
The aim of this study was to investigate both the hypothetical study strategy (preferences) and actual study (practices) of EFL undergraduate students regarding rereading versus retrieval practice. A total of 202 EFL students were presented with a scenario where they had studied a textbook chapter once and then asked to choose the learning strategy that best reflected their typical approach during different stages of the learning process: the beginning, middle, and end. Then they read a text and responded to both open-ended and forced report questionnaires to explore their actual study behaviors when studying the text. Results showed a consistent preference for restudying throughout all stages of the learning process (36.5%, 39.8%, 53.6% respectively). Across the learning processes, retesting strategy has been chosen increasingly as the learning process proceeds (16% - 18.2% - 28.2%) while rereading is decreasing (35.9% - 23.8% - 13.3%). In the actual study behaviors, the majority of participants reported tendency to rely excessively on restudying and rereading strategies (55.6% and 24.6% respectively) rather than more effective testing strategies (19.8%). Teachers need to educate students that retrieval practice strategies aid in monitoring their learning progress, enhancing learning, strengthening memory recall, and promoting long-term retention.
Keywords: Strategy use, strategy preferences, restudying, retesting strategies, rereading
Received: 30 Jun 2024; Accepted: 05 Nov 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Aljabri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Sameer Aljabri, Umm al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.