Skip to main content

HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Educ.
Sec. Language, Culture and Diversity
Volume 9 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1442011
This article is part of the Research Topic Situating Equity at the Center of Continuous Improvement in Education View all 3 articles

Towards a continuous improvement for justice

Provisionally accepted
  • WestEd, San Francisco, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    An emerging body of research on equity has begun to identify how equity can be fostered in continuous improvement (e.g., Valdez et al., 2020; Bush-Mecenas, 2022; Jabbar & Childs, 2022). However, our conceptual paper argues for the need for continuous improvement (CI) work to begin moving beyond equity and towards justice. To do so, we first offer conceptualizations of equity and justice in CI work, highlighting that equity concerns reducing disparities in dominant outcomes while justice focuses on improving towards outcomes that are concerned primarily with affirming, dignifying, and granting agency to Black, Brown, working-class, and other marginalized students. We draw on critical race theories and critical design research to illustrate the distinction between equity and justice, drawing parallels to design research as a body of knowledge that can inform the trajectory of CI as a field as it moves towards justice. Our paper offers examples of equity- and justice-focused continuous improvement projects and initiatives, recognizing the value and importance of equity work while simultaneously offering a critique of that work to uplift an orientation towards justice. We then generate a set of tenets for a justice-focused continuous improvement approach. We test and illustrate these principles using past and ongoing CI work. We offer directions for future practice and research that can advance the field towards justice and liberation in CI and beyond equity, articulating where we envision the capacity- and field-building work ought to take place in order to center justice in CI.

    Keywords: continuous improvement, Social justice in education, educational equity, education leadership, Improvement science

    Received: 01 Jun 2024; Accepted: 20 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Sandoval and Neri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Carlos Sandoval, WestEd, San Francisco, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.