Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Educ.
Sec. STEM Education
Volume 9 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1441720
This article is part of the Research Topic Education in Synthetic Biology View all 4 articles

Synthetic biology education and pedagogy: a review of evolving practices in a growing discipline

Provisionally accepted
Jyler Menard Jyler Menard 1*Patrick Diep Patrick Diep 2*Fatima Sheikh Fatima Sheikh 3Andres Escobar Andres Escobar 3*Christien Dykstra Christien Dykstra 1Victoria A. Sajtovich Victoria A. Sajtovich 4*Atiyeh Ahmadi Atiyeh Ahmadi 5*Elena Bodyreva Elena Bodyreva 2*Austin Boucinha Austin Boucinha 6*Saranya Chandrasekharan Saranya Chandrasekharan 7Jin Duan Jin Duan 8Christian Emond Christian Emond 9*Tianyu Lu Tianyu Lu 10*Ian Mclean Ian Mclean 11Lauren Morse Lauren Morse 12*Danielle Serra Danielle Serra 2Albert Stancescu Albert Stancescu 2Smriti Suresh Smriti Suresh 13Brian P. Ingalls Brian P. Ingalls 14*
  • 1 Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • 2 University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 3 McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • 4 Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany
  • 5 University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • 6 Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, Mississauga, Canada
  • 7 Phyx44 labs Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru, India
  • 8 Rapid Novor, Inc, Kitchener, Canada
  • 9 University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • 10 Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • 11 University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 12 University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • 13 McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • 14 Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Synthetic biology is a growing field with an increasing number of successful applications. Yet, synthetic biology (SynBio) education initiatives are underreported and disconnected from each other. In this review we survey the literature on SynBio education and stratify this body of work into three categories: classroom activities, course designs, and program-level curricula-planning. For each category, we discuss the methods used to assess students' experiences and achievement of learning objectives. Throughout, we identify trends and opportunities for further development in SynBio education. We determined that the design of low-cost education kits is a growing opportunity to support student learning at the level of classroom activities. In support of that work, we present a mapping of published education kits onto Bloom's taxonomy, taking into account increasing accumulation of knowledge through continued experience. We further found that project-based learning is used widely and has proven effective in course designs. To facilitate such activities, we provide a high-level guide for the conversion of a didactic course into a project-based learning course. Further, we note that, currently, programs are delivered primarily at the graduate level, taking inspiration from traditional degree programs while incorporating interdisciplinary training. Finally, we find that design-based research may provide an effective framework for an iterative, mixed-method study design. To support such efforts, we provide a schematic overview of design-based research and its application to a learning progression for interdisciplinary skills. We conclude with a discussion of specific learning concepts that may be useful to SynBio educators and education researchers.

    Keywords: Synthetic Biology, Education, pedagogy, Curriculum, education kits, project-based learning, design-based research

    Received: 03 Jun 2024; Accepted: 05 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Menard, Diep, Sheikh, Escobar, Dykstra, Sajtovich, Ahmadi, Bodyreva, Boucinha, Chandrasekharan, Duan, Emond, Lu, Mclean, Morse, Serra, Stancescu, Suresh and Ingalls. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Jyler Menard, Concordia University, Montreal, H3G 1M8, Quebec, Canada
    Patrick Diep, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5S 1A1, Ontario, Canada
    Andres Escobar, McMaster University, Hamilton, L8S 4L8, Ontario, Canada
    Victoria A. Sajtovich, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany
    Atiyeh Ahmadi, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, N2L 3G1, Ontario, Canada
    Elena Bodyreva, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5S 1A1, Ontario, Canada
    Austin Boucinha, Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, Mississauga, Canada
    Christian Emond, University of Calgary, Calgary, T2N 1N4, Alberta, Canada
    Tianyu Lu, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, California, United States
    Lauren Morse, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, Ontario, Canada
    Brian P. Ingalls, Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, N2V2M2, Ontario, Canada

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.